FG % by distance, historical
Distance Percent # of attempts
18 Yards 100% 15
19 Yards 100% 100
20 Yards 99.51% 202
21 Yards 97.67% 215
22 Yards 98.02% 253
23 Yards 98.19% 277
24 Yards 94.62% 223
25 Yards 99.23% 261
26 Yards 96.88% 224
27 Yards 97.00% 267
28 Yards 95% 300
29 Yards 94.36% 266
30 Yards 93.07% 274
31 Yards 94.49% 272
32 Yards 94.62% 260
33 Yards 94.10% 339
34 Yards 86.04% 265
35 Yards 90.55% 275
36 Yards 87.76% 286
37 Yards 84.75% 295
38 Yards 83.29% 353
Great coaches should know this.
a 5 yard gain from 37 yards to 32 yards has a 10% difference, just sayin'
@"Mattyman" said: a 5 yard gain from 37 yards to 32 yards has a 10% difference, just sayin'I completely agree but if your odds improved from 84% to 94% by lining up your 40 million dollar per year QB, 2 Pro bowl receivers and a pro bowl back checking the defensive alignment to see if the play is there , dont you always do it ?
So the greater the distance, the less probability of success?
Mind. blown.
@"Kentis" said: Zim’s new goal is to play for the 19 yarder, thanks a lot @Bullazin… ;) B)That would at least *be* a goal, vs. Zimmer just turtling at the earliest possible moment without any situationally strategic thought whatsoever beyond "oh stop the offense now we might fumble or something".
@"Vanguard83" said: So the greater the distance, the less probability of success?Mind. blown.
Cmon Van, embrace your inner nerd-wonkiness. B)
Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)
Warn Poster
Suspend User (3 days)
The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.