Who Was 0-3 On Targets And Can't Protect Joe Burrow's Blindside?
Yikes
Yes, I know it's early, but he hasn't been getting separation all camp to boot.
Could of had Sewell.
Bengals gonna Bengal.
@"JustinTime18™" said:Bengals won they're first road playoff game in 31 years.
Jamarr Chase.....on the year....
| 1. | Cooper Kupp • LAR | 1947 |
| 2. | Justin Jefferson • MIN | 1616 |
| 3. | Davante Adams • GNB | 1553 |
| 4. | Ja'Marr Chase • CIN | 1455 |
| 5. | Deebo Samuel • SFO | 1405 |
1455 by Chase...was 55 yards greater than Justin Jefferson's rookie year.
@"savannahskol" said:@"JustinTime18™" said: Bengals won they're first road playoff game in 31 years.Jamarr Chase.....on the year....
1. Cooper Kupp • LAR 1947 2. Justin Jefferson • MIN 1616 3. Davante Adams • GNB 1553 4. Ja'Marr Chase • CIN 1455 5. Deebo Samuel • SFO 1405
1455 by Chase...was 55 yards greater than Justin Jefferson's rookie year.
But just like JJs pursuit of Moss's team record, the 17 game schedule makes it an asterisk at best accomplishment.
@"StickyBun" said: Burrow is a really hard dude not to like.I completely agree...
Man, he got pounded yesterday too.
I think the Titans might be the first team ever to get 9 sacks in a post-season game and lose???
Tannehill is not the answer in TN.
They have all the other pieces, might they be in the QB market??
@"minny65" said: Tannehill is not the answer in TN.They have all the other pieces, might they be in the QB market??
Titans OC made a few calls (especially on 3rd down) that are easy to critically judge in hind-sight....
Couple of those 3rd and shorts, when they tried to pound Henry up the middle while they had DB's playing 4/5 yards off the los? Those were easy picking 1st downs.
Maybe it was up to the QB to change the play, if they gave him the latitude to do it.
Bottom line was sometimes they were they're own worst enemy.
@"purplefaithful" said:@"minny65" said: Tannehill is not the answer in TN.They have all the other pieces, might they be in the QB market??
Titans OC made a few calls (especially on 3rd down) that are easy to critically judge in hind-sight....
Couple of those 3rd and shorts, when they tried to pound Henry up the middle while they had DB's playing 4/5 yards off the los? Those were easy picking 1st downs.
Maybe it was up to the QB to change the play, if they gave him the latitude to do it.
Bottom line was sometimes they were they're own worst enemy.
That is all true in almost every game.Back to: Tannehill is not the answer as good as his story is and he is so likeable, but they need to be in QB market - Cousins anyone??
@"minny65" said:@"purplefaithful" said:@"minny65" said: Tannehill is not the answer in TN.They have all the other pieces, might they be in the QB market??
Titans OC made a few calls (especially on 3rd down) that are easy to critically judge in hind-sight....
Couple of those 3rd and shorts, when they tried to pound Henry up the middle while they had DB's playing 4/5 yards off the los? Those were easy picking 1st downs.
Maybe it was up to the QB to change the play, if they gave him the latitude to do it.
Bottom line was sometimes they were they're own worst enemy.
That is all true in almost every game.Back to: Tannehill is not the answer as good as his story is and he is so likeable, but they need to be in QB market - Cousins anyone??
So if we trade KC, what are they going to replace him with?Maybe Tannehill? You couldn't hope for more - realistically.
Anyways, we've been down the KC rabbit hole, dont mean to derail the thread.
@"purplefaithful" said:@"minny65" said:@"purplefaithful" said:@"minny65" said: Tannehill is not the answer in TN.They have all the other pieces, might they be in the QB market??
Titans OC made a few calls (especially on 3rd down) that are easy to critically judge in hind-sight....
Couple of those 3rd and shorts, when they tried to pound Henry up the middle while they had DB's playing 4/5 yards off the los? Those were easy picking 1st downs.
Maybe it was up to the QB to change the play, if they gave him the latitude to do it.
Bottom line was sometimes they were they're own worst enemy.
That is all true in almost every game.Back to: Tannehill is not the answer as good as his story is and he is so likeable, but they need to be in QB market - Cousins anyone??
So if we trade KC, what are they going to replace him with?Maybe Tannehill? You couldn't hope for more - realistically.
Anyways, we've been down the KC rabbit hole, dont mean to derail the thread.
That's up to our new GM/HC to figure out.The OP from August was about Chase but has been updated to Bengals/Titans
The Bengals are fine at QB and the Titans are a QB away. That is all I was saying.
As far as rabbit hole that is true of every debate/conversation where people have differing opinions and that is what blogs are for. I agree, too soon to start that one again but going back to Titans they need a QB because they seem to have all the other pieces IMO (which was always my mantra about what KC needs).
I'll bet Borrow's knees would prefer Sewell. Maybe not now, but...he won't survive long term with that OL.
Chase had a great year, but about 500 (476) of his yards came in two games...
Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)
Warn Poster
Suspend User (3 days)
The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.