WFT name options latest
The Washington Football Team has reportedly narrowed their list of potential names down to 3 options, per the team's "Making the Brand" series.
— Front Office Sports (@FOS) August 18, 2021
Their finalists come from these eight:
- Armada
- Presidents
- Brigade
- RedHogs
- Commanders
- RedWolves
- Defenders
- WFT pic.twitter.com/8W4eEpEwRS
You're only given a little spark of madness. You mustn't lose it. — Robin Williams
Redwolves sounds kinda cool. and honors the old "red" in a different way.
Presidents? Is that a joke?
I like Redhogs and Redwolves for the "red" connection to the previous team. Sweathogs would be a too easy replacement for RedHogs. But even without that, Washington Redwolves wins in my book due to alliteration.
Washington Football Team, I chuckle everytime I see WFT.
@"MaroonBells" said: Presidents? Is that a joke?I like Redhogs and Redwolves for the "red" connection to the previous team. Sweathogs would be a too easy replacement for RedHogs. But even without that, Washington Redwolves wins in my book due to alliteration.
Sounds positively stupid to me. If the Redskins name was so damn offensive, why have “Red” in any part of their name? It simply creates a link to their racist past. Not my view, but the view of those that forced the change. Defenders would be okay in theory if that’s what our country truly stood for anymore. Lol
@"BigAl99" said: Washington Football Team, I chuckle everytime I see WFT.I bought the Washington Team Football shirt to commemerate the name forever.
@"Waterboy" said:@"MaroonBells" said: Presidents? Is that a joke?I like Redhogs and Redwolves for the "red" connection to the previous team. Sweathogs would be a too easy replacement for RedHogs. But even without that, Washington Redwolves wins in my book due to alliteration.
Sounds positively stupid to me. If the Redskins name was so damn offensive, why have “Red” in any part of their name? It simply creates a link to their racist past. Not my view, but the view of those that forced the change. Defenders would be okay in theory if that’s what our country truly stood for anymore. Lol
So Washington imperialists?
@"Waterboy" said:@"MaroonBells" said: Presidents? Is that a joke?I like Redhogs and Redwolves for the "red" connection to the previous team. Sweathogs would be a too easy replacement for RedHogs. But even without that, Washington Redwolves wins in my book due to alliteration.
Sounds positively stupid to me. If the Redskins name was so damn offensive, why have “Red” in any part of their name? It simply creates a link to their racist past. Not my view, but the view of those that forced the change. Defenders would be okay in theory if that’s what our country truly stood for anymore. Lol
So in your mind, "red" is what made "redskin" racist? LOL. You know what, that makes perfect sense, Waterboy. While we're at it, we can change Red Sox, Redbull and the Red Cross.
@"MaroonBells" said:@"Waterboy" said:@"MaroonBells" said: Presidents? Is that a joke?I like Redhogs and Redwolves for the "red" connection to the previous team. Sweathogs would be a too easy replacement for RedHogs. But even without that, Washington Redwolves wins in my book due to alliteration.
Sounds positively stupid to me. If the Redskins name was so damn offensive, why have “Red” in any part of their name? It simply creates a link to their racist past. Not my view, but the view of those that forced the change. Defenders would be okay in theory if that’s what our country truly stood for anymore. Lol
So in your mind, "red" is what made "redskin" racist? LOL. You know what, that makes perfect sense, Waterboy. While we're at it, we can change Red Sox, Redbull and the Red Cross.
Also: Big Red gum and the band Simply Red.
The monthly visitor can no longer be called the Red Menace.
Red Auerbach was obviously racist.....although he was a Russian Jew.
@"MaroonBells" said:@"Waterboy" said:@"MaroonBells" said: Presidents? Is that a joke?I like Redhogs and Redwolves for the "red" connection to the previous team. Sweathogs would be a too easy replacement for RedHogs. But even without that, Washington Redwolves wins in my book due to alliteration.
Sounds positively stupid to me. If the Redskins name was so damn offensive, why have “Red” in any part of their name? It simply creates a link to their racist past. Not my view, but the view of those that forced the change. Defenders would be okay in theory if that’s what our country truly stood for anymore. Lol
So in your mind, "red" is what made "redskin" racist? LOL. You know what, that makes perfect sense, Waterboy. While we're at it, we can change Red Sox, Redbull and the Red Cross.
No Red does not make it racist, but the common link in the name still creates the association between the two. I know that’s really difficult to understand. I wasn’t offended either way, but even I listen to the other side enough to hear their complaints. The other names try to at least create a link to the city. The Red names would not be picked but for the fact that the team was formerly called the Redskins which then creates a linkage to the original reason the name was eliminated. So yes, they probably should avoid the Buffalo Skins and Toughskins as well.
What about that fucker Red Maccombs? That asshat gave Randy Moss away in his prime.
@"MaroonBells" said:@"Waterboy" said:@"MaroonBells" said: Presidents? Is that a joke?I like Redhogs and Redwolves for the "red" connection to the previous team. Sweathogs would be a too easy replacement for RedHogs. But even without that, Washington Redwolves wins in my book due to alliteration.
Sounds positively stupid to me. If the Redskins name was so damn offensive, why have “Red” in any part of their name? It simply creates a link to their racist past. Not my view, but the view of those that forced the change. Defenders would be okay in theory if that’s what our country truly stood for anymore. Lol
So in your mind, "red" is what made "redskin" racist? LOL. You know what, that makes perfect sense, Waterboy. While we're at it, we can change Red Sox, Redbull and the Red Cross.How about the "Red Coats"? As in "The Red Coats are coming, the Red Coats are coming!". =)
@"HappyViking" said:@"MaroonBells" said:@"Waterboy" said:@"MaroonBells" said: Presidents? Is that a joke?I like Redhogs and Redwolves for the "red" connection to the previous team. Sweathogs would be a too easy replacement for RedHogs. But even without that, Washington Redwolves wins in my book due to alliteration.
Sounds positively stupid to me. If the Redskins name was so damn offensive, why have “Red” in any part of their name? It simply creates a link to their racist past. Not my view, but the view of those that forced the change. Defenders would be okay in theory if that’s what our country truly stood for anymore. Lol
So in your mind, "red" is what made "redskin" racist? LOL. You know what, that makes perfect sense, Waterboy. While we're at it, we can change Red Sox, Redbull and the Red Cross.How about the "Red Coats"? As in "The Red Coats are coming, the Red Coats are coming!". =)
That would at least have some linking to history. I would think Turn Coats would be more fitting, though. :)
my money is on Commanders but I too like the Washington Football Team
They feel like a old video game team who didnt give the rights, which for the Washington ownership, seems about right
Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)
Warn Poster
Suspend User (3 days)
The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.
