Forum The Longship Don't expect to see the starters much tomorrow....

Don't expect to see the starters much tomorrow....

StickierBuns
Joined May 2013
8,221 posts
Rep: 83
Liked:
#1 · Aug 13, 7:28 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I’m glad Mond got to play. When behind by 27 points I don’t think the team was expecting him to perform miracles. It got him in and gave him some realtime reps. I don’t see hiw this game can damage his psyche….

Dozier, on the other hand, may need to be on suicide watch…

Liked:
#22 · Aug 14, 5:31 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Did any Viking come play today?

Patrick Jones II
Rose - RB

List ends there.

OL, secondary and ST start off like they left off last season - bad.  I know we held out a ton of starters but our 2's, 3's did not play well at all vs the Broncos 2's and 3's. 

Only 1st preseason game but unwatchable.  

Liked:
#23 · Aug 14, 5:38 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"pattersaur" said:
@"MaroonBells" said: Mond should not have played. 
Completely disagree. Why do you say that? Because he didnt look great? If thats the bar then no one on the team should have played

EDIT- Further, would anyone rather see empty Nate Stanley reps if he’s gonna be cut in 2 weeks? I genuinely see zero gain in that. 



Not because he didn't look great. Because he didn't look comfortable. 

Liked:
#24 · Aug 14, 5:59 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"pattersaur" said:
@"MaroonBells" said: Mond should not have played. 
Completely disagree. Why do you say that? Because he didnt look great? If thats the bar then no one on the team should have played

EDIT- Further, would anyone rather see empty Nate Stanley reps if he’s gonna be cut in 2 weeks? I genuinely see zero gain in that. 



Not because he didn't look great. Because he didn't look comfortable. 


well you dont get more comfortable by sitting on the sidelines. needs reps. best reps are game reps to get better

Liked:
#25 · Aug 14, 7:58 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"pattersaur" said:
@"MaroonBells" said: Mond should not have played. 
Completely disagree. Why do you say that? Because he didnt look great? If thats the bar then no one on the team should have played

EDIT- Further, would anyone rather see empty Nate Stanley reps if he’s gonna be cut in 2 weeks? I genuinely see zero gain in that. 



Not because he didn't look great. Because he didn't look comfortable. 


He was already because of the time he missed. Maybe this is a wake up call.

Liked:
#26 · Aug 14, 9:03 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"NorthernCalVike" said:
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"pattersaur" said:
@"MaroonBells" said: Mond should not have played. 
Completely disagree. Why do you say that? Because he didnt look great? If thats the bar then no one on the team should have played

EDIT- Further, would anyone rather see empty Nate Stanley reps if he’s gonna be cut in 2 weeks? I genuinely see zero gain in that. 



Not because he didn't look great. Because he didn't look comfortable. 


well you dont get more comfortable by sitting on the sidelines. needs reps. best reps are game reps to get better


Yep. This isnt a David Carr situation where he is thrown out there for 3 seasons with no OL. It’s a zero pressure, down 20, against the 3s situation. He’s gotta be out there for that, and even tho it was 75% handoffs, I thought Mond did fine.

Browning looked Mannionesque in his limited time. In your opinion should he have not been playing also? 

Liked:
#27 · Aug 14, 9:04 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"NorthernCalVike" said:
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"pattersaur" said:
@"MaroonBells" said: Mond should not have played. 
Completely disagree. Why do you say that? Because he didnt look great? If thats the bar then no one on the team should have played

EDIT- Further, would anyone rather see empty Nate Stanley reps if he’s gonna be cut in 2 weeks? I genuinely see zero gain in that. 



Not because he didn't look great. Because he didn't look comfortable. 


well you dont get more comfortable by sitting on the sidelines. needs reps. best reps are game reps to get better


Couldn't disagree more. The best reps at his stage of development are in practice. Yes, eventually you add game reps to those and you develop even more, but it was clear to me he wasn't ready for that. Those 10 missed days killed him. He'll bounce back though...assuming he gets a solid week of practice in this week. 

Liked:
#28 · Aug 15, 5:43 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Not much to take from this game...zero starters played, lol. What sucks is from 'a fan at the game' perspective. Was complete and utter garbage to pay to see that yesterday. If some fans want to try and judge any players from this, I say don't waste your time. 

Liked:
#29 · Aug 15, 6:22 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
#Vikings RGs in yesterday's game:

Dakota Dozier (17 snaps):
- 20.9 overall grade
- 24.9 pass blocking grade
- 46.3 run blocking grade

 Wyatt Davis (49 snaps):
- 78.9 overall grade
- 59.7 pass blocking grade
- 77.6 run blocking grade

Liked:
#30 · Aug 15, 10:35 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"StickyBun" said: Not much to take from this game...zero starters played, lol. What sucks is from 'a fan at the game' perspective. Was complete and utter garbage to pay to see that yesterday. If some fans want to try and judge any players from this, I say don't waste your time. 
I was watching to see depth and to see who might be making the team.  I probably watched 5 games this weekend so around 10 teams.  No team, even those that didn't play starters came out as flat as we did.  We saw the same weaknesses leftover from last year - bad OL, bad ST's, and a bad secondary.  

Hoping to see better and more inspired play from our 2 and 3's the next 2 preseason games.

No doubt, on paper, we have a playoff caliber team.  But we need some guys to surprise and step up even if just rotational and depth for injuries.  

Liked:
#31 · Aug 15, 10:50 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"NorthernCalVike" said:
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"pattersaur" said:
@"MaroonBells" said: Mond should not have played. 
Completely disagree. Why do you say that? Because he didnt look great? If thats the bar then no one on the team should have played

EDIT- Further, would anyone rather see empty Nate Stanley reps if he’s gonna be cut in 2 weeks? I genuinely see zero gain in that. 



Not because he didn't look great. Because he didn't look comfortable. 


well you dont get more comfortable by sitting on the sidelines. needs reps. best reps are game reps to get better


Couldn't disagree more. The best reps at his stage of development are in practice. Yes, eventually you add game reps to those and you develop even more, but it was clear to me he wasn't ready for that. Those 10 missed days killed him. He'll bounce back though...assuming he gets a solid week of practice in this week. 


That would have been ideal but because of dumb choices that was not going to happen. It is what it is.

Liked:
#32 · Aug 15, 10:53 AM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship Don't expect to see the starters much tomorrow....
Return to top ↑

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!