NFL pledges to halt ‘race-norming,’ review Black claims
NFL vows to stop use of "race-norming" in reviewing brain injury claims - CBS News
The NFL on Wednesday pledged to halt the use of "race-norming" — which assumed Black players started out with lower cognitive function — in the $1 billion settlement of brain injury claims and review past scores for any potential race bias.
Wednesday's announcement comes after a pair of Black players filed a civil rights lawsuit over the practice, medical experts raised concerns and a group of NFL families last month dropped 50,000 petitions at the federal courthouse in Philadelphia — where the lawsuit had been thrown out by the judge overseeing the settlement.
"Words are cheap. Let's see what they do," said former Washington running back Ken Jenkins, whose wife, Amy Lewis, led the petition drive on behalf of NFL friends struggling with cognitive problems. Jenkins, an insurance executive, has so far been spared.
According to the NFL, a panel of neuropsychologists formed recently to propose a new testing regime to the court includes two female and three Black doctors.
"The replacement norms will be applied prospectively and retrospectively for those players who otherwise would have qualified for an award but for the application of race-based norms," the NFL said in a statement issued Wednesday by spokesman Brian McCarthy.
Lead players lawyer Christopher Seeger, who negotiated the 2013 settlement with the NFL, said earlier this year that he had not seen any evidence of racial bias in the administration of the settlement fund. He amended those remarks Wednesday, apologizing for any pain the program has caused.
"I am sorry for the pain this episode has caused Black former players and their families. Ultimately, this settlement only works if former players believe in it, and my goal is to regain their trust and ensure the NFL is fully held to account," Seeger said in a statement.
The NFL noted that the norms were developed in medicine "to stop bias in testing, not perpetrate it." And both Seeger and the league said the practice was never mandatory, but left to the discretion of doctors taking part in the settlement program.
The binary race norms, when they are used in the testing, assume that Black patients start with worse cognitive function than Whites and other non-Blacks. That makes it harder for them to show a deficit and qualify for an award. Henry and Davenport, for instance, were denied awards but would have qualified had they been White, according to their lawsuit, which Brody dismissed in March, calling it an improper "collateral attack" on the settlement. They have appealed the ruling.
More than 2,000 NFL retirees have filed dementia claims, but fewer than 600 have received awards, according to the most recent report. More than half of all NFL retirees are Black, according to lawyers involved in the litigation.
The awards so far have averaged $516,000 for the 379 players with early-stage dementia and $715,000 for the 207 players with moderate dementia. Retirees can also seek payouts for Alzheimer's disease and a few other diagnoses. The settlement ended thousands of lawsuits that accused the NFL of long hiding what it knew about the link between concussions and traumatic brain injury.
@"Waterboy" said: So, there were no differences in scores between blacks and whites prior to testing? Im not fully comprehending the argument here. We should absolutely declare racism right away without discussing anything else?Im sure my reply automatically makes me racist.
"Race norming" has been around for years.
Originally it was introduced as a way for employers to "adjust upwards" average black scores on competency exams in the hiring for workplaces.
"Race norming" was defended by many, when it was thought to "level the playing field". A key component to Affirmative Action. NYTimes: Race norming necessary for now
"Race norming" was as horrible an idea back then, as it is now.
What in the Actual Hell is "Race Norming" and why is the NFL admitting to it, Now?
I love this pull-quote:
"This horrific practice has not only proven to be detrimental to Black players, but is infuriating considering the lectures football fans have been subjected to recently about racism and Black Lives Matter. Customers who just want to watch men play football have been subjected to accusations about their politics and beliefs every time they sit down to watch the NFL. The self-righteousness has been palpable. Yet here we are, discovering that while the NFL has been lecturing you they are actually the worst offenders.
Let us not forget that this is the same organization that told Eugene Chung he could not avail himself of the league’s policy on making more room for minority coaching applicants because he was “not the right minority.”"
@"Havoc1649" said: This is not a surprise to me. In my experience, some of the worst offenders of race based decision making are those the loudest about racial equality/equity. The NFL is just another one of the many organizations that say one thing, but do the opposite in actual action.
Yep.
"The mainstream news media had no reason to report on the horror show of race norming because it was a nice thing that white liberals did for Black folks and that’s all that mattered.
Except now it really matters, because the health of Black NFL players and provisions for their families are on the line and doctors are using the “good intentions” to basically accuse Black players of being too retarded to incur serious brain injury."
Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)
Warn Poster
Suspend User (3 days)
The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.