Forum The Longship Vikings win draft day trade

Vikings win draft day trade

MaroonBells
Joined Jan 2014
4,318 posts
Rep: 4,499
2. Minnesota Vikings-New York JetsThe trade: Jets receive picks Nos. 14 and 143; Vikings receive picks Nos. 23, 66 and 86 The value winner: Vikings Surplus value: Early third-round pick After leading these rankings a year ago, the Vikings again took advantage of the edge gained in the trade market. In this case it was an incredible deal for them, particularly considering the player they ended up with: Christian Darrisaw, who was a logical fit for Minnesota at pick No. 14 and ended up falling to No. 23. For the Jets, this looks like an error. The overpay is by almost exactly pick No. 66 itself -- had that pick been removed, this trade would have been "fair." I'm not arguing the Jets shouldn't have drafted an offensive lineman to protect Zach Wilson. On the contrary, I think they should have drafted more of them. If we want to put this trade in the context of players, think about it this way: If you were the Jets, for the same price would you rather draft USC guard Alijah Vera-Tucker or Oklahoma State tackle Teven Jenkins and BYU tackle/guard Brady Christensen? Jets GM Joe Douglas chose the former, but history indicates the latter is more likely to pay off. And that's not even counting the possibility that Darrisaw or Vera-Tucker might've slid to No. 23. At the time of the Jets' selection, there was a 21% and 34% chance of those players making it to No. 23, respectively, according to ESPN's Draft Day Predictor.

“A gentleman is someone who can play the accordion, but doesn't." - Tom Waits

Liked:
#1 · May 9, 10:32 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

This may be an unpopular opinion but I think Spielman has gotten very lucky in the way these last couple drafts have played out.  Last year when Jefferson fell and you knew the Eagles were taking a WR I was screaming at the top of my lungs for the Vikings to jump them to take him.  They are lucky Howie Roseman is an idiot and jumped on Jalen Raeger leaving Jefferson to fall into our laps.  That was pure luck and stupidity by the Eagles. 

This year I was in the group that couldn't believe we traded down 9 spots and didn't even recoup a second round pick in the process....when the Giants picking a couple spots ahead of us, also traded down 9 spots and got a first round pick next year.  I thought the two 3rd round picks were not valuable enough to drop down that far and take us out of the group of players we eligible to select with the 14th pick.  I agree with Maroon's assessment of how the trade down went and the Vikings probably had a group of 3 to 4 players on the board they coveted with Phillips likely being the top choice.  The fact that Darrisaw was still on the board was extremely lucky and the only reason that was is because there were some curious picks before our selection, including the Raiders annual WTF selection in the first round.  So again, Spielman was very lucky to trade down that far and have a blue chip player fall into our laps.  I wonder who the pick would have been in Darrisaw was off the board?  I'm guessing it would have been someone none of us were very happy with

Liked:
#22 · May 10, 11:54 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Vikergirl" said: It was nerve-wracking but there was some luck in the way the board fell and that Darrisaw was still there. 
I was oddly calm. Never in my wildest did I think it would turn out this well. 
Liked:
#23 · May 10, 11:57 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"BarrNone55" said:
@"Vikergirl" said: It was nerve-wracking but there was some luck in the way the board fell and that Darrisaw was still there. 
I was oddly calm. Never in my wildest did I think it would turn out this well. 

I didn't think your Samsung was going to survive the trade down.  I know mine almost didn't 

Liked:
#24 · May 10, 12:03 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"supafreak84" said: This may be an unpopular opinion but I think Spielman has gotten very lucky in the way these last couple drafts have played out.  Last year when Jefferson fell and you knew the Eagles were taking a WR I was screaming at the top of my lungs for the Vikings to jump them to take him.  They are lucky Howie Roseman is an idiot and jumped on Jalen Raeger leaving Jefferson to fall into our laps.  That was pure luck and stupidity by the Eagles. 

This year I was in the group that couldn't believe we traded down 9 spots and didn't even recoup a second round pick in the process....when the Giants picking a couple spots ahead of us, also traded down 9 spots and got a first round pick next year.  I thought the two 3rd round picks were not valuable enough to drop down that far and take us out of the group of players we eligible to select with the 14th pick.  I agree with Maroon's assessment of how the trade down went and the Vikings probably had a group of 3 to 4 players on the board they coveted with Phillips likely being the top choice.  The fact that Darrisaw was still on the board was extremely lucky and the only reason that was is because there were some curious picks before our selection, including the Raiders annual WTF selection in the first round.  So again, Spielman was very lucky to trade down that far and have a blue chip player fall into our laps.  I wonder who the pick would have been in Darrisaw was off the board?  I'm guessing it would have been someone none of us were very happy with


I think that had more to do with the fact that the Bears traded up for a QB instead of a guard. I'm sure the Giants knew they could extract a bigger haul for a QB desperate team.

Liked:
#25 · May 10, 12:12 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"PurpleCrush" said:
@"supafreak84" said: This may be an unpopular opinion but I think Spielman has gotten very lucky in the way these last couple drafts have played out.  Last year when Jefferson fell and you knew the Eagles were taking a WR I was screaming at the top of my lungs for the Vikings to jump them to take him.  They are lucky Howie Roseman is an idiot and jumped on Jalen Raeger leaving Jefferson to fall into our laps.  That was pure luck and stupidity by the Eagles. 

This year I was in the group that couldn't believe we traded down 9 spots and didn't even recoup a second round pick in the process....when the Giants picking a couple spots ahead of us, also traded down 9 spots and got a first round pick next year.  I thought the two 3rd round picks were not valuable enough to drop down that far and take us out of the group of players we eligible to select with the 14th pick.  I agree with Maroon's assessment of how the trade down went and the Vikings probably had a group of 3 to 4 players on the board they coveted with Phillips likely being the top choice.  The fact that Darrisaw was still on the board was extremely lucky and the only reason that was is because there were some curious picks before our selection, including the Raiders annual WTF selection in the first round.  So again, Spielman was very lucky to trade down that far and have a blue chip player fall into our laps.  I wonder who the pick would have been in Darrisaw was off the board?  I'm guessing it would have been someone none of us were very happy with


I think that had more to do with the fact that the Bears traded up for a QB instead of a guard. I'm sure the Giants knew they could extract a bigger haul for a QB desperate team.


Yes but Mac Jones was still on the board, who was picked by New England one spot after us. 

Just at the time I thought the value we received in the trade was not equivalent to the players we were going to lose out on dropping that far down the draft board. Luckily, very luckily...it worked out okay

Liked:
#26 · May 10, 12:31 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"supafreak84" said:
@"BarrNone55" said:
@"Vikergirl" said: It was nerve-wracking but there was some luck in the way the board fell and that Darrisaw was still there. 
I was oddly calm. Never in my wildest did I think it would turn out this well. 

I didn't think your Samsung was going to survive the trade down.  I know mine almost didn't 



Maybe it's age. Maybe it's wisdom. Maybe it's faith in Rick. I just never got amped up at all. Nothing. Flat line. Once Slater went, I wanted a trade down. 

Liked:
#27 · May 10, 12:41 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"BarrNone55" said:
@"supafreak84" said:
@"BarrNone55" said:
@"Vikergirl" said: It was nerve-wracking but there was some luck in the way the board fell and that Darrisaw was still there. 
I was oddly calm. Never in my wildest did I think it would turn out this well. 

I didn't think your Samsung was going to survive the trade down.  I know mine almost didn't 



Maybe it's age. Maybe it's wisdom. Maybe it's faith in Rick. I just never got amped up at all. Nothing. Flat line. Once Slater went, I wanted a trade down. 


That brings up another point in that if Slater was the tipping point and the reason for the trade down, why are we letting him get selected to a team picking immediately before us? I know trades take two to tango, but if he was "our guy" and you know the Chargers need a tackle...why are we letting that happen? Same could of happened last year with Jefferson but luckily Howie Roseman is a moron and we were saved by that and that alone 

Liked:
#28 · May 10, 12:50 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"supafreak84" said:
@"BarrNone55" said:
@"supafreak84" said:
@"BarrNone55" said:
@"Vikergirl" said: It was nerve-wracking but there was some luck in the way the board fell and that Darrisaw was still there. 
I was oddly calm. Never in my wildest did I think it would turn out this well. 

I didn't think your Samsung was going to survive the trade down.  I know mine almost didn't 



Maybe it's age. Maybe it's wisdom. Maybe it's faith in Rick. I just never got amped up at all. Nothing. Flat line. Once Slater went, I wanted a trade down. 


That brings up another point in that if Slater was the tipping point and the reason for the trade down, why are we letting him get selected to a team picking immediately before us? I know trades take two to tango, but if he was "our guy" and you know the Chargers need a tackle...why are we letting that happen? Same could of happened last year with Jefferson but luckily Howie Roseman is a moron and we were saved by that and that alone 


Yeah, but it's never all or nothing. From all accounts, Vikings did try to trade up, just couldn't find any takers at a price the Vikings were willing to spend. In other words, they may have had Slater higher, but not higher ENOUGH over Darrisaw, AVT, Phillips, etc., to justify what it would've cost. 

Liked:
#29 · May 10, 1:15 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I think we need to give Rick some credit.  No matter how it happened it did. He's done a heck of a job for awhile now and I'm glad The Vikings have him.  When things like this happen on multiple occasions it's more than luck, there's skill involved.

Liked:
#30 · May 10, 1:21 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"supafreak84" said:
@"BarrNone55" said:
@"supafreak84" said:
@"BarrNone55" said:
@"Vikergirl" said: It was nerve-wracking but there was some luck in the way the board fell and that Darrisaw was still there. 
I was oddly calm. Never in my wildest did I think it would turn out this well. 

I didn't think your Samsung was going to survive the trade down.  I know mine almost didn't 



Maybe it's age. Maybe it's wisdom. Maybe it's faith in Rick. I just never got amped up at all. Nothing. Flat line. Once Slater went, I wanted a trade down. 


That brings up another point in that if Slater was the tipping point and the reason for the trade down, why are we letting him get selected to a team picking immediately before us? I know trades take two to tango, but if he was "our guy" and you know the Chargers need a tackle...why are we letting that happen? Same could of happened last year with Jefferson but luckily Howie Roseman is a moron and we were saved by that and that alone 


Yeah, but it's never all or nothing. From all accounts, Vikings did try to trade up, just couldn't find any takers at a price the Vikings were willing to spend. In other words, they may have had Slater higher, but not higher ENOUGH over Darrisaw, AVT, Phillips, etc., to justify what it would've cost. 


They had Sewell way above the rest of the O-lineman but to your point Slater/Darrisaw/AVT were all spaced closely. Depending who you asked they tried to make a move up the board, but the answer was it was more for Fields that Sewell. They were very much in on Trey Lance & Fields and if the 49ers would have went Mac Jones at #3 the Vikings would have gone home with one of the two. The way picks 9-12 fell also played a big factor. The Giants were going to take Devonta Smith before the Eagles jumped them. The Cowboys weren't trading down again, nor were the Chargers passing on Slater or AVT. So it easily could have gone: 

#10 - Parson 
#11 - Smith 
#12 - Slater
#13 - AVT
#14 - Fields 

Liked:
#31 · May 10, 1:50 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Geoff Nichols" said:
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"supafreak84" said:
@"BarrNone55" said:
@"supafreak84" said:
@"BarrNone55" said:
@"Vikergirl" said: It was nerve-wracking but there was some luck in the way the board fell and that Darrisaw was still there. 
I was oddly calm. Never in my wildest did I think it would turn out this well. 

I didn't think your Samsung was going to survive the trade down.  I know mine almost didn't 



Maybe it's age. Maybe it's wisdom. Maybe it's faith in Rick. I just never got amped up at all. Nothing. Flat line. Once Slater went, I wanted a trade down. 


That brings up another point in that if Slater was the tipping point and the reason for the trade down, why are we letting him get selected to a team picking immediately before us? I know trades take two to tango, but if he was "our guy" and you know the Chargers need a tackle...why are we letting that happen? Same could of happened last year with Jefferson but luckily Howie Roseman is a moron and we were saved by that and that alone 


Yeah, but it's never all or nothing. From all accounts, Vikings did try to trade up, just couldn't find any takers at a price the Vikings were willing to spend. In other words, they may have had Slater higher, but not higher ENOUGH over Darrisaw, AVT, Phillips, etc., to justify what it would've cost. 


They had Sewell way above the rest of the O-lineman but to your point Slater/Darrisaw/AVT were all spaced closely. Depending who you asked they tried to make a move up the board, but the answer was it was more for Fields that Sewell. They were very much in on Trey Lance & Fields and if the 49ers would have went Mac Jones at #3 the Vikings would have gone home with one of the two. The way picks 9-12 fell also played a big factor. The Giants were going to take Devonta Smith before the Eagles jumped them. The Cowboys weren't trading down again, nor were the Chargers passing on Slater or AVT. So it easily could have gone: 

#10 - Parson 
#11 - Smith 
#12 - Slater
#13 - AVT
#14 - Fields 



Glad it didn't. 

Liked:
#32 · May 10, 2:20 PM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship Vikings win draft day trade
Return to top ↑

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!