Forum The Longship Vikings have some OL dollars

Vikings have some OL dollars

MaroonBells
Joined Jan 2014
4,315 posts
Rep: 4,499

Chiefs are now last, but Vikings are 2nd. 

“A gentleman is someone who can play the accordion, but doesn't." - Tom Waits

Liked:
#1 · Mar 12, 5:33 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Now that Reiff has been cut, I'd like to see them resign Rashod Hill. That shouldn't add much to the total.

Liked:
#2 · Mar 12, 5:41 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Knucklehead" said: Now that Reiff has been cut, I'd like to see them resign Rashod Hill. That shouldn't add much to the total.
I do too. He's an extremely valuable player to have as depth. Worst-case scenario is he starts at LT. I don't think that kills us. If you move O'Neill to LT, an Udoh / Hill comp at RT would be a good one. 
Liked:
#3 · Mar 12, 6:01 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

You've got a highly compensated QB. You've got a highly compensated RB. I think to maximize the ROI, we should put some dollars into the OL. Last year we were 4th in yards and 11th in points. Get a better OL and we'll do even better.

Liked:
#4 · Mar 12, 7:09 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"BarrNone55" said: You've got a highly compensated QB. You've got a highly compensated RB. I think to maximize the ROI, we should put some dollars into the OL. Last year we were 4th in yards and 11th in points. Get a better OL and we'll do even better.
Man, they just lost their starting LT who was arguably the best player on that mediocre OL.

Improvement might be asking too much from that group...

Liked:
#5 · Mar 12, 7:11 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"purplefaithful" said:
@"BarrNone55" said: You've got a highly compensated QB. You've got a highly compensated RB. I think to maximize the ROI, we should put some dollars into the OL. Last year we were 4th in yards and 11th in points. Get a better OL and we'll do even better.
Man, they just lost their starting LT who was arguably the best player on that mediocre OL.

Improvement might be asking too much from that group...



Improvement at LT? No. But I do expect improvement from the overall group. We can't expect Cleveland, Darrisaw, whoever it is, to come in and be better than Reiff. Sure, it's possible, but unlikely.

However, releasing Reiff gives us the money to improve at guard. I expect to see improvement at both guard positions, as well as at center and RT. 

Liked:
#6 · Mar 12, 7:42 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"MaroonBells" said: Chiefs are now last, but Vikings are 2nd. 

https://twitter.com/SeanBormanNFL/status/1370054517794955265?s=20


This is good.  They spent a 1st and two 2nds to get those starters and might spend another 1st this year.  There is a lot of value in that expenditure not included.

Let's say they manage to trade for Orlando Brown.

That list next year will be much different if Brown and O'Neill have extensions eh?

I hope they do NOT break the bank and try to keep the signings to lower if possible.

I wonder if the Jaguars are interested in Barr?

If the Vikings can rework the contract I would not mind seeing a Barr for Andrew Norwell trade.

Liked:
#7 · Mar 12, 7:44 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"Knucklehead" said: Now that Reiff has been cut, I'd like to see them resign Rashod Hill. That shouldn't add much to the total.
I do too. He's an extremely valuable player to have as depth. Worst-case scenario is he starts at LT. I don't think that kills us. If you move O'Neill to LT, an Udoh / Hill comp at RT would be a good one. 
I think I would rather see Hill at LT and ONeill at RT,  Hill has looked pedestrian at best on the right side,  but seems to be much better on the left.
Liked:
#8 · Mar 12, 7:46 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"MarkSP18" said:
@"MaroonBells" said: Chiefs are now last, but Vikings are 2nd. 

https://twitter.com/SeanBormanNFL/status/1370054517794955265?s=20


This is good.  They spent a 1st and two 2nds to get those starters and might spend another 1st this year.  There is a lot of value in that expenditure not included.

Let's say they manage to trade for Orlando Brown.

That list next year will be much different if Brown and O'Neill have extensions eh?

I hope they do NOT break the bank and try to keep the signings to lower if possible.

I wonder if the Jaguars are interested in Barr?

If the Vikings can rework the contract I would not mind seeing a Barr for Andrew Norwell trade.



I agree. I'm not a huge fan of adding Brown. You'd be paying big contracts to bookend tackles the same season Cousins' contract peaks. I'm much more for adding a 2nd tier guard in free agency and then adding another OL (G/T) in the draft. That syncs a little bit better with the reality of this line's financial future (Bradbury and Cleveland come due the same year as well). 

Liked:
#9 · Mar 12, 7:51 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"MarkSP18" said:
@"MaroonBells" said: Chiefs are now last, but Vikings are 2nd. 

https://twitter.com/SeanBormanNFL/status/1370054517794955265?s=20


This is good.  They spent a 1st and two 2nds to get those starters and might spend another 1st this year.  There is a lot of value in that expenditure not included.

Let's say they manage to trade for Orlando Brown.

That list next year will be much different if Brown and O'Neill have extensions eh?

I hope they do NOT break the bank and try to keep the signings to lower if possible.

I wonder if the Jaguars are interested in Barr?

If the Vikings can rework the contract I would not mind seeing a Barr for Andrew Norwell trade.



I agree. I'm not a huge fan of adding Brown. You'd be paying big contracts to bookend tackles the same season Cousins' contract peaks. I'm much more for adding a 2nd tier guard in free agency and then adding another OL (G/T) in the draft. That syncs a little bit better with the reality of this line's financial future (Bradbury and Cleveland come due the same year as well). 


I think the Jaguars may end up cutting Norwell.  If I am Rick, I would give up a 6th for him as long as he would be willing to extend/restructure.

If they release him it could be difficult to secure his services.

Then, if they can add Zeitler for 4 to 5M, they might just have something.

Liked:
#10 · Mar 12, 8:45 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

@MaroonBells Do you want to find out what Brown can do for you?

I'm a little more than lukewarm depending on the price. I'm a bit warmer if this is an indicator that we will move from a scheme fit to a get the best player and scheme to the collective strength of the unit.

Zone fits Cook and the athletic guys we have on the ol. We ran more power concepts with Ezra. Whatever we can do to improve the line, the interior in particular, I'm down with. 

Liked:
#11 · Mar 12, 8:52 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"JimmyinSD" said:
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"Knucklehead" said: Now that Reiff has been cut, I'd like to see them resign Rashod Hill. That shouldn't add much to the total.
I do too. He's an extremely valuable player to have as depth. Worst-case scenario is he starts at LT. I don't think that kills us. If you move O'Neill to LT, an Udoh / Hill comp at RT would be a good one. 
I think I would rather see Hill at LT and ONeill at RT,  Hill has looked pedestrian at best on the right side,  but seems to be much better on the left.
Aren't most proposals to move O'Neill to LT built around the hope that Udoh can become a good RT? I think that's what Maroon really meant by "Udoh / Hill at RT" - Hill as an insurance policy in case Udoh can't handle the spot.

So much planning would be easier if Udoh had played more, and if O'Neill had been tried at LT...even the Lions game. But.....

Re the idea of adding someone like Brown indicating the Vikings are willing to implement power blocking schemes: that wouldn't agree with the enthusiasm for Kyle Hinton as a possible starting OG in the near future, does it? Hinton is super athletic and weighed 295 when drafted.

Liked:
#12 · Mar 12, 9:19 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Jor-El" said:
@"JimmyinSD" said:
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"Knucklehead" said: Now that Reiff has been cut, I'd like to see them resign Rashod Hill. That shouldn't add much to the total.
I do too. He's an extremely valuable player to have as depth. Worst-case scenario is he starts at LT. I don't think that kills us. If you move O'Neill to LT, an Udoh / Hill comp at RT would be a good one. 
I think I would rather see Hill at LT and ONeill at RT,  Hill has looked pedestrian at best on the right side,  but seems to be much better on the left.
Aren't most proposals to move O'Neill to LT built around the hope that Udoh can become a good RT? I think that's what Maroon really meant by "Udoh / Hill at RT" - Hill as an insurance policy in case Udoh can't handle the spot.

So much planning would be easier if Udoh had played more, and if O'Neill had been tried at LT...even the Lions game. But.....

Re the idea of adding someone like Brown indicating the Vikings are willing to implement power blocking schemes: that wouldn't agree with the enthusiasm for Kyle Hinton as a possible starting OG in the near future, does it? Hinton is super athletic and weighed 295 when drafted.



IMO,  any scheme that requires undersized lineman is a mess waiting to happen.  no matter how good they are there are times throughout every game where the offense needs to pick up a tough yard and the defense knows it and if the OL doesnt have the beef to get that done then IMO thats a recipe for failure.  not being able to get any push in the run game usually leads to no anchor in pass protection.  even if a guard isnt going to be leading on sweeps,  I want guards that can push DTs off the ball on run plays and stone wall them at the LOS on passing downs.  its great if those big men can move a little, thats a bonus, but being able to move their assignment IMO is more important the getting around the end and sealing back on a run or getting down field on a DB.

Liked:
#13 · Mar 12, 9:29 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"BarrNone55" said: @MaroonBells Do you want to find out what Brown can do for you?

I'm a little more than lukewarm depending on the price. I'm a bit warmer if this is an indicator that we will move from a scheme fit to a get the best player and scheme to the collective strength of the unit.

Zone fits Cook and the athletic guys we have on the ol. We ran more power concepts with Ezra. Whatever we can do to improve the line, the interior in particular, I'm down with. 


Don't get me wrong. I will not be upset if we end up with Brown. As you say, it would signal a shift NOT to a power scheme, but less dependent on uber-athletic linemen. Keep Cleveland at guard, add another guard in the draft and suddenly you have a starting offensive line where all five are 25 or younger and every one of them is on a rookie contract. Of course, that won't last long, but it's damn fun to think about.

I think I might prefer a cheaper route: a cheap Lane Taylor (or similar) at right guard, then Slater, Darrisaw, or AVT competing with Cleveland for the LT slot, loser moving to LG. But either one sets us up for the most promising line we've had in years. 

Liked:
#14 · Mar 12, 10:32 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

@MaroonBells Taylor or Zeitler if we go with a guy on their third contract. But, Lamp is more likely as Rick tends to hit guys on their second deal.

Regardless, I'm hoping we have some holes plugged prior to the draft.

Liked:
#15 · Mar 12, 10:40 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

The Vikings haven't had a road grader in 10 years since Hutchinson- 

As a run first team, that makes NO sense to me.

Liked:
#16 · Mar 12, 11:11 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

At some point the Vikings have to get tired of Akiem Hicks destroying the interior of our offensive line every year. He ragdolls these light in the pants offensive lineman we have every year.  I would love to see us spend some money and get some bigger interior lineman 

Liked:
#17 · Mar 12, 7:18 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"supafreak84" said: At some point the Vikings have to get tired of Akiem Hicks destroying the interior of our offensive line every year. He ragdolls these light in the pants offensive lineman we have every year.  I would love to see us spend some money and get some bigger interior lineman 
Hopefully, the Bears cut Hicks and the Vikings pick him up.
Liked:
#18 · Mar 12, 8:10 PM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship Vikings have some OL dollars
Return to top ↑

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!