Forum The Longship Is that the real Eric Wilson?

Is that the real Eric Wilson?

purplefaithful
Joined May 2013
7,613 posts
Rep: 4,201

or a fluke????

Wilson had six tackles, two tackles for losses, a sack and the interception.

Hurry-up Vikings, we ain't getting any younger! 

Liked:
#1 · Oct 12, 8:34 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

He seems inconsistent. Frequently out of place, but damned if he doesn't make a lot of big plays. If he can even it out, we might have our long-term Barr replacement.

For what it's worth, I'm convinced that the reason the Vikings were so far behind the 8-ball in terms of salary cap last spring is because they never intended to re-sign Barr. 

Liked:
#2 · Oct 12, 8:51 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Well, they did let him sign with the Jets so that corroborates your thesis  ;)

I agree they had no intent of throwing that kinda $$ at him, but most likely settled at an amount that fit into their plans all along.

Not sure I agree with their plans though. They should have thrown $$$ at a decent FA G instead. 

Liked:
#3 · Oct 12, 8:55 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

IMHO Wilson is the LB version of Ant Harris.

Wilson @ 3.2 mil vs, Barr 12.7 mil is hard to quantify.

MB theory seems legit.

Liked:
#4 · Oct 12, 9:05 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Wilson was a big-play all-over-the-field playmaker in college, so potentially yes.


@"MaroonBells" said:
He seems inconsistent. Frequently out of place, but damned if he doesn't make a lot of big plays. If he can even it out, we might have our long-term Barr replacement.

For what it's worth, I'm convinced that the reason the Vikings were so far behind the 8-ball in terms of salary cap last spring is because they never intended to re-sign Barr. 

If that's so, isn't letting your first-round picks leave before their second contract a flawed way of planning? I know Trae Waynes didn't ever fully emerge here, but it seemed like there was never intent to re-sign him, and he knew it. Maybe this looks worse because we lost some 1st-rounders to injury (Floyd, Bridgewater) and plain lousiness (Patterson, Treadwell), but sad that very few remain and it would look worse if Barr had left.

Liked:
#5 · Oct 12, 9:17 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Barr looks like a backup compared to how Wilson played tonight

Liked:
#6 · Oct 12, 10:34 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Barr and Wilson seem like very different LBs to me. Wilson is shorter and lighter but faster. I think he's much better in coverage, which is really critical now. But Zimmer seems to love having a 6-5, 250 strongside LB. Pre-draft, I think most scouts saw Barr as a 3-4 rush LB and I think that was how the Jets intended to use him.
It's paradoxical because Zimmer seems to love Barr and want to keep him here and keep him on the field, but rarely has him rushing the QB. Wilson seems to get to the QB more, actually. Before Barr got hurt, Zimmer kept throwing him into coverage, including situations where he was challenged to keep pace with the players he covered. It's strange what Zimmer seems to see as Barr's strengths.

Liked:
#7 · Oct 12, 10:46 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Jor-El" said:
Barr and Wilson seem like very different LBs to me. Wilson is shorter and lighter but faster. I think he's much better in coverage, which is really critical now. But Zimmer seems to love having a 6-5, 250 strongside LB. Pre-draft, I think most scouts saw Barr as a 3-4 rush LB and I think that was how the Jets intended to use him. It's paradoxical because Zimmer seems to love Barr and want to keep him here and keep him on the field, but rarely has him rushing the QB. Wilson seems to get to the QB more, actually. Before Barr got hurt, Zimmer kept throwing him into coverage, including situations where he was challenged to keep pace with the players he covered. It's strange what Zimmer seems to see as Barr's strengths.
except that Barr sucks at rushing,  he is so easily blocked its really pathetic for his size and athleticism.  if he cant beat the line clean he doesnt get home,  or even ever really apply pressure.  about the best thing barr does is he doesnt usually get blown up so he does plug a hole, and has show the ability to go lateral and force plays to the edge and out of bounds or make the play with a DB helper.... so theres that.
Liked:
#8 · Oct 12, 10:58 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"JimmyinSD" said:
@"Jor-El" said:
Barr and Wilson seem like very different LBs to me. Wilson is shorter and lighter but faster. I think he's much better in coverage, which is really critical now. But Zimmer seems to love having a 6-5, 250 strongside LB. Pre-draft, I think most scouts saw Barr as a 3-4 rush LB and I think that was how the Jets intended to use him. It's paradoxical because Zimmer seems to love Barr and want to keep him here and keep him on the field, but rarely has him rushing the QB. Wilson seems to get to the QB more, actually. Before Barr got hurt, Zimmer kept throwing him into coverage, including situations where he was challenged to keep pace with the players he covered. It's strange what Zimmer seems to see as Barr's strengths.
except that Barr sucks at rushing,  he is so easily blocked its really pathetic for his size and athleticism.  if he cant beat the line clean he doesnt get home,  or even ever really apply pressure.  about the best thing barr does is he doesnt usually get blown up so he does plug a hole, and has show the ability to got lateral and force plays to the edge and out of bounds or make the play with a DB helper.... so theres that.

Yes - he seems like an old-school 4-3 OLB: seal the edge, stuff the run.

Liked:
#9 · Oct 12, 11:58 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Jor-El" said:
Wilson was a big-play all-over-the-field playmaker in college, so potentially yes.
@"MaroonBells" said: He seems inconsistent. Frequently out of place, but damned if he doesn't make a lot of big plays. If he can even it out, we might have our long-term Barr replacement.

For what it's worth, I'm convinced that the reason the Vikings were so far behind the 8-ball in terms of salary cap last spring is because they never intended to re-sign Barr. 

If that's so, isn't letting your first-round picks leave before their second contract a flawed way of planning? I know Trae Waynes didn't ever fully emerge here, but it seemed like there was never intent to re-sign him, and he knew it. Maybe this looks worse because we lost some 1st-rounders to injury (Floyd, Bridgewater) and plain lousiness (Patterson, Treadwell), but sad that very few remain and it would look worse if Barr had left.



It's not that cut and dried. Again (and again) you look at the Vikings in a vacuum without considering how what they do compares to the rest of the NFL. You can look at Treadwell and say "bust, we suck at draft5ing" and not realize that the Vikings has far fewer of these than the rest of the NFL.

You might say letting Barr or Waynes leave is a mistake and that "very few remain," but the reality is that the Vikings frequently rank near the top of the NFL in the amount of their own draft picks on the roster. They were number one in 2016 and number one again last year. And very close to the top in the years between. 

Context. 

Liked:
#10 · Oct 12, 12:09 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"Jor-El" said:
Wilson was a big-play all-over-the-field playmaker in college, so potentially yes.
@"MaroonBells" said: He seems inconsistent. Frequently out of place, but damned if he doesn't make a lot of big plays. If he can even it out, we might have our long-term Barr replacement.

For what it's worth, I'm convinced that the reason the Vikings were so far behind the 8-ball in terms of salary cap last spring is because they never intended to re-sign Barr. 

If that's so, isn't letting your first-round picks leave before their second contract a flawed way of planning? I know Trae Waynes didn't ever fully emerge here, but it seemed like there was never intent to re-sign him, and he knew it. Maybe this looks worse because we lost some 1st-rounders to injury (Floyd, Bridgewater) and plain lousiness (Patterson, Treadwell), but sad that very few remain and it would look worse if Barr had left.



It's not that cut and dried. Again (and again) you look at the Vikings in a vacuum without considering how what they do compares to the rest of the NFL. You can look at Treadwell and say "bust, we suck at draft5ing" and not realize that the Vikings has far fewer of these than the rest of the NFL.

You might say letting Barr or Waynes leave is a mistake and that "very few remain," but the reality is that the Vikings frequently rank near the top of the NFL in the amount of their own draft picks on the roster. They were number one in 2016 and number one again last year. And very close to the top in the years between. 

Context. 



of course how many of those guys that we have on the roster that we drafted make a contribution on game day... (and you cant count Samias contributions to the other teams stats line :p ).  sure we have some pretty good draft picks,  but with Ricks approach of quantity over quality,  and our cap situation most years,  it stands to reason that we will have a bunch of cheap place holders that came through the draft.  Ricks done a pretty decent job,  but his number of picks every draft should have him landing a few extra on the roster when all things are factored in.  not being able to find a QB, DTs, and OL in the draft have certainly hurt our current position.

Liked:
#11 · Oct 12, 12:29 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Wilson seems hungry to be a starter.

Liked:
#12 · Oct 12, 12:51 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"JimmyinSD" said:
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"Jor-El" said:
Wilson was a big-play all-over-the-field playmaker in college, so potentially yes.
@"MaroonBells" said: He seems inconsistent. Frequently out of place, but damned if he doesn't make a lot of big plays. If he can even it out, we might have our long-term Barr replacement.

For what it's worth, I'm convinced that the reason the Vikings were so far behind the 8-ball in terms of salary cap last spring is because they never intended to re-sign Barr. 

If that's so, isn't letting your first-round picks leave before their second contract a flawed way of planning? I know Trae Waynes didn't ever fully emerge here, but it seemed like there was never intent to re-sign him, and he knew it. Maybe this looks worse because we lost some 1st-rounders to injury (Floyd, Bridgewater) and plain lousiness (Patterson, Treadwell), but sad that very few remain and it would look worse if Barr had left.



It's not that cut and dried. Again (and again) you look at the Vikings in a vacuum without considering how what they do compares to the rest of the NFL. You can look at Treadwell and say "bust, we suck at draft5ing" and not realize that the Vikings has far fewer of these than the rest of the NFL.

You might say letting Barr or Waynes leave is a mistake and that "very few remain," but the reality is that the Vikings frequently rank near the top of the NFL in the amount of their own draft picks on the roster. They were number one in 2016 and number one again last year. And very close to the top in the years between. 

Context. 


not being able to find a QB, DTs, and OL in the draft have certainly hurt our current position.


Teddy Bridgewater, Sharif Floyd, Brian O'Neill and Garrett Bradbuy are very clearly not misses. Ponder was. We'll have to wait and see on Cleveland. But, yeah, Samia looks more and more like a bad pick every day, with the Vikings contributing heavily to the NFL's meager 29% hit rate on 4th round OLs. 

I say it every year and I'll say it again, if I'm a GM, I use one pick from the 2nd or 3rd round on an OL. You do that every year whether you need one or not and you should never have to burn a valuable 1st rounder on an OL again, which in my opinion does not produce adequate ROI. 

Liked:
#13 · Oct 12, 2:02 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"JimmyinSD" said:
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"Jor-El" said:
Wilson was a big-play all-over-the-field playmaker in college, so potentially yes.
@"MaroonBells" said: He seems inconsistent. Frequently out of place, but damned if he doesn't make a lot of big plays. If he can even it out, we might have our long-term Barr replacement.

For what it's worth, I'm convinced that the reason the Vikings were so far behind the 8-ball in terms of salary cap last spring is because they never intended to re-sign Barr. 

If that's so, isn't letting your first-round picks leave before their second contract a flawed way of planning? I know Trae Waynes didn't ever fully emerge here, but it seemed like there was never intent to re-sign him, and he knew it. Maybe this looks worse because we lost some 1st-rounders to injury (Floyd, Bridgewater) and plain lousiness (Patterson, Treadwell), but sad that very few remain and it would look worse if Barr had left.



It's not that cut and dried. Again (and again) you look at the Vikings in a vacuum without considering how what they do compares to the rest of the NFL. You can look at Treadwell and say "bust, we suck at draft5ing" and not realize that the Vikings has far fewer of these than the rest of the NFL.

You might say letting Barr or Waynes leave is a mistake and that "very few remain," but the reality is that the Vikings frequently rank near the top of the NFL in the amount of their own draft picks on the roster. They were number one in 2016 and number one again last year. And very close to the top in the years between. 

Context. 


not being able to find a QB, DTs, and OL in the draft have certainly hurt our current position.


Teddy Bridgewater, Sharif Floyd, Brian O'Neill and Garrett Bradbuy are very clearly not misses. Ponder was. We'll have to wait and see on Cleveland. But, yeah, Samia looks more and more like a bad pick every day, with the Vikings contributing heavily to the NFL's meager 29% hit rate on 4th round OLs. 

I say it every year and I'll say it again, if I'm a GM, I use one pick from the 2nd or 3rd round on an OL. You do that every year whether you need one or not and you should never have to burn a valuable 1st rounder on an OL again, which in my opinion does not produce adequate ROI. 



we are going to mostly agree on this,  but you named 4 players over 14 (?) years of Rick drafting ( 8 of which he has had sole control) , at positions that account for over 1/3 of our starting spots.   As far Cleveland I am wondering WTF is up with him because at the very least we should hope he could plug in at LG by now and kick Dozier to RG until Elf gets back.  

I like the notion of dedicating a day 2 pick to OL every year,  seems like a good use of what would normally just be turned into a 4th and 3-7th round picks.

Liked:
#14 · Oct 12, 2:09 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"JimmyinSD" said:
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"JimmyinSD" said:
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"Jor-El" said:
Wilson was a big-play all-over-the-field playmaker in college, so potentially yes.
@"MaroonBells" said: He seems inconsistent. Frequently out of place, but damned if he doesn't make a lot of big plays. If he can even it out, we might have our long-term Barr replacement.

For what it's worth, I'm convinced that the reason the Vikings were so far behind the 8-ball in terms of salary cap last spring is because they never intended to re-sign Barr. 

If that's so, isn't letting your first-round picks leave before their second contract a flawed way of planning? I know Trae Waynes didn't ever fully emerge here, but it seemed like there was never intent to re-sign him, and he knew it. Maybe this looks worse because we lost some 1st-rounders to injury (Floyd, Bridgewater) and plain lousiness (Patterson, Treadwell), but sad that very few remain and it would look worse if Barr had left.



It's not that cut and dried. Again (and again) you look at the Vikings in a vacuum without considering how what they do compares to the rest of the NFL. You can look at Treadwell and say "bust, we suck at draft5ing" and not realize that the Vikings has far fewer of these than the rest of the NFL.

You might say letting Barr or Waynes leave is a mistake and that "very few remain," but the reality is that the Vikings frequently rank near the top of the NFL in the amount of their own draft picks on the roster. They were number one in 2016 and number one again last year. And very close to the top in the years between. 

Context. 


not being able to find a QB, DTs, and OL in the draft have certainly hurt our current position.


Teddy Bridgewater, Sharif Floyd, Brian O'Neill and Garrett Bradbuy are very clearly not misses. Ponder was. We'll have to wait and see on Cleveland. But, yeah, Samia looks more and more like a bad pick every day, with the Vikings contributing heavily to the NFL's meager 29% hit rate on 4th round OLs. 

I say it every year and I'll say it again, if I'm a GM, I use one pick from the 2nd or 3rd round on an OL. You do that every year whether you need one or not and you should never have to burn a valuable 1st rounder on an OL again, which in my opinion does not produce adequate ROI. 



we are going to mostly agree on this,  but you named 4 players over 14 (?) years of Rick drafting ( 8 of which he has had sole control) , at positions that account for over 1/3 of our starting spots.   As far Cleveland I am wondering WTF is up with him because at the very least we should hope he could plug in at LG by now and kick Dozier to RG until Elf gets back.  

I like the notion of dedicating a day 2 pick to OL every year,  seems like a good use of what would normally just be turned into a 4th and 3-7th round picks.



Especially when you consider there's a 6th round rookie starting at LG in New England and getting raves. Seriously, grading out as one of the best guards in the NFL.

But I suspect he was more NFL ready than Cleveland. Cleveland's biggest problem is that he's a project type player. A little undersized, small school coaching, no OTA, no preseason. He was drafted for upside like O'Neill. But it makes you wonder...are coaches just afraid of players like that? Would O'Neill have even gotten a chance his rookie season if Hill doesn't get hurt? 

Liked:
#15 · Oct 12, 2:21 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"JimmyinSD" said:
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"JimmyinSD" said:
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"Jor-El" said:
Wilson was a big-play all-over-the-field playmaker in college, so potentially yes.
@"MaroonBells" said: He seems inconsistent. Frequently out of place, but damned if he doesn't make a lot of big plays. If he can even it out, we might have our long-term Barr replacement.

For what it's worth, I'm convinced that the reason the Vikings were so far behind the 8-ball in terms of salary cap last spring is because they never intended to re-sign Barr. 

If that's so, isn't letting your first-round picks leave before their second contract a flawed way of planning? I know Trae Waynes didn't ever fully emerge here, but it seemed like there was never intent to re-sign him, and he knew it. Maybe this looks worse because we lost some 1st-rounders to injury (Floyd, Bridgewater) and plain lousiness (Patterson, Treadwell), but sad that very few remain and it would look worse if Barr had left.



It's not that cut and dried. Again (and again) you look at the Vikings in a vacuum without considering how what they do compares to the rest of the NFL. You can look at Treadwell and say "bust, we suck at draft5ing" and not realize that the Vikings has far fewer of these than the rest of the NFL.

You might say letting Barr or Waynes leave is a mistake and that "very few remain," but the reality is that the Vikings frequently rank near the top of the NFL in the amount of their own draft picks on the roster. They were number one in 2016 and number one again last year. And very close to the top in the years between. 

Context. 


not being able to find a QB, DTs, and OL in the draft have certainly hurt our current position.


Teddy Bridgewater, Sharif Floyd, Brian O'Neill and Garrett Bradbuy are very clearly not misses. Ponder was. We'll have to wait and see on Cleveland. But, yeah, Samia looks more and more like a bad pick every day, with the Vikings contributing heavily to the NFL's meager 29% hit rate on 4th round OLs. 

I say it every year and I'll say it again, if I'm a GM, I use one pick from the 2nd or 3rd round on an OL. You do that every year whether you need one or not and you should never have to burn a valuable 1st rounder on an OL again, which in my opinion does not produce adequate ROI. 



we are going to mostly agree on this,  but you named 4 players over 14 (?) years of Rick drafting ( 8 of which he has had sole control) , at positions that account for over 1/3 of our starting spots.   As far Cleveland I am wondering WTF is up with him because at the very least we should hope he could plug in at LG by now and kick Dozier to RG until Elf gets back.  

I like the notion of dedicating a day 2 pick to OL every year,  seems like a good use of what would normally just be turned into a 4th and 3-7th round picks.



Especially when you consider there's a 6th round rookie starting at LG in New England and getting raves. Seriously, grading out as one of the best guards in the NFL.

But I suspect he was more NFL ready than Cleveland. Cleveland's biggest problem is that he's a project type player. A little undersized, small school coaching, no OTA, no preseason. He was drafted for upside like O'Neill. But it makes you wonder...are coaches just afraid of players like that? Would O'Neill have even gotten a chance his rookie season if Hill doesn't get hurt? 



and remember Hill on the right side was nothing to write home about,  it was a night and day improvement when ONeill got in there.   how the coaches couldnt have seen enough in practice to know that was a likelihood is a real head scratcher IMO.

Liked:
#16 · Oct 12, 2:24 PM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship Is that the real Eric Wilson?
Return to top ↑

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!