Forum The Longship Harris wants a long term deal, said he has 'tremen...

Harris wants a long term deal, said he has 'tremendous will power'...

StickierBuns
Joined May 2013
8,218 posts
Rep: 83
Sources say Anthony Harris, who got franchise tag of $11.441 million by #Vikings, really wants security of a long-term deal. He played on 1-year restricted FA deal last year. He'd love to stay in Minnesota on long-term deal & buy a house, etc. He wants a commitment from some team
Liked:
#1 · Mar 20, 10:46 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

so give it to him,  but he needs to make it work cap wise as well.  Will power is great,  but you cant take it to the bank.

Liked:
#2 · Mar 20, 11:24 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"JimmyinSD" said: so give it to him,  but he needs to make it work cap wise as well.  Will power is great,  but you cant take it to the bank.
My sentiments exactly.  As one of the best ball-hawks I've seen wearing purple over the last decade, he needs to get paid...commensurate with his position and the current cap situation.  If he's jiggy with that, write him the check.
Liked:
#3 · Mar 20, 11:36 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Agreed. Pay the man, he’s earned it. He might be the best in the league at his position. He’s definitely top 5 and he means wins for the team and stability on the back end.

Liked:
#4 · Mar 20, 12:02 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Havoc1649" said: Agreed. Pay the man, he’s earned it. He might be the best in the league at his position. He’s definitely top 5 and he means wins for the team and stability on the back end.
This^^^
Liked:
#5 · Mar 20, 12:59 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Harris has more than earned it.  doesnt mean however we have the resources to pay him and the rest of our stars. 

Z needs to earn his general stars this year and make a middling talent a playoff  team 

Liked:
#6 · Mar 20, 1:04 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I'm going with "Don't pay him" long term.  Dude's a stud, but we can't spend so much on two safeties, and I trust Zimmer to get good enough performance out of a cheaper option.  I do think the one year on the tag sounds like a pretty good option though as it gives us a one year cushion with all our D changes.

Liked:
#7 · Mar 20, 4:32 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Hmm... if the money was equal, who do you choose:

Dalvin Cook or Anthony Harris?
Contract: 4 years- $8.5M/yr for each.
That deal would make Harris the 15th highest paid S, or Dalvin the 5th highest paid RB. Maybe a bit low for Harris but humor me.

Tough call. :#

Liked:
#8 · Mar 20, 4:41 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"pattersaur" said:
Hmm... if the money was equal, who do you choose:

Dalvin Cook or Anthony Harris?
Contract: 4 years- $8.5M/yr for each.
That deal would make Harris the 15th highest paid S, or Dalvin the 5th highest paid RB. Maybe a bit low for Harris but humor me.

Tough call. :#



Harris ain't signing for the 15th highest salary for his position on a long term deal...

I would sign Dalvin for that, but that isn't happening either.

Liked:
#9 · Mar 20, 4:45 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Wetlander" said:
@"pattersaur" said:
Hmm... if the money was equal, who do you choose:

Dalvin Cook or Anthony Harris?
Contract: 4 years- $8.5M/yr for each.
That deal would make Harris the 15th highest paid S, or Dalvin the 5th highest paid RB. Maybe a bit low for Harris but humor me.

Tough call. :#



Harris ain't signing for the 15th highest salary for his position on a long term deal...

I would sign Dalvin for that, but that isn't happening either.


Okay then up the deal to $10M/yr. Or $12M. The point is, who would you choose? (Or neither)

Liked:
#10 · Mar 20, 4:47 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Harris, as much as I want Cook, he is fun to watch.  Harris can be a part of the team much longer, IF he can keep up the level of play. 

Liked:
#11 · Mar 20, 4:53 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I would choose Harris. If we didn’t have Mattison on the team already my answer may be different. I love watching Cook play ball, but he’s at a tough position for injuries and he’s been prone. 
It looks to me like we are rolling with youngsters at the corners. Great safeties are ideal in such a situation if you ask me. Pay one or the other. Invest at safety and develop young reasonably priced youth at corner who are on their first contract. 
I’ve always viewed the defensive backfield as one expenditure. I want at least a couple of studs back there and I don’t necessarily care which position it’s at. What I know about Ant is the guy is a tackling ace who sticks in coverage and can diagnose underneath. 

Liked:
#12 · Mar 20, 7:51 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

There has to be some disagreement about his value between his agent and the Vikings.  If they could agree to a long term deal even at 4 year 44 mil they could structure it so at least half of that 11 mil tag amount frees up.

But they are not which makes me think they are playing a little hard ball.  Wait until other teams sign safeties and then if he does not agree to a reasonable deal just rescind the tag. That would free up 11 mil which they would have to scramble to use on at least two safeties (Vonn Bell, Damarious Randall, Tavon Wilson, & maybe Tony Jefferson).

It just seems short sighted with the current cap situation.

Liked:
#13 · Mar 20, 8:24 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Havoc1649" said: I would choose Harris. If we didn’t have Mattison on the team already my answer may be different. 


I'd choose Harris too, except I probably wouldn't even need Mattison either.

Looking at the 49ers overpaying Juszczyk and going on to kill it with 3 (generally thought to be) subpar backs and then how often we were using the FB, I can't help but wonder if CJ Ham would make things easier for even the Mike Boone types.

Thinking if a RB knows their assignments and can pick up blocks... that stuff's probably tougher for an NFL running back than churning yards on the ground behind CJ...

Liked:
#14 · Mar 20, 9:02 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Looks like a stare-down.  'Willpower' meaning won't sign the tag, gimme a long term deal or trade me.  Vikes don't want to tie up that much at safety with Smith already in a big contract and they rightly or wrongly are probably planning to give the big $ to Cook.

Which leaves a trade but I gotta think they are asking for a 1st  and not finding any takers.  Rick will have to stick to his guns here.

Liked:
#15 · Mar 24, 8:58 AM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship Harris wants a long term deal, said he has 'tremen...
Return to top ↑

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!