Forum The Longship PFF grades the QBs in 2019.

PFF grades the QBs in 2019.

MaroonBells
Joined Jan 2014
4,321 posts
Rep: 4,503

Get the man some protection.
6. KIRK COUSINSMINNESOTA VIKINGSAfter a slow start to the season and one of the worst games of his career in Week 2 against the Packers, Cousins turned things around to put together the best performance of his career and his second top-10 finish in PFF grading. He took to the Vikings’ outside zone/play action-heavy scheme, working well both inside and outside the pocket. Cousins was incredibly accurate at the intermediate (10 to 19 yards downfield) level, and he cut down on his turnover-worthy plays. The biggest improvement this season was his increase of 3.8 percentage points in positively graded throw rate, the third-highest mark in the NFL, and that's a credit to the system and supporting cast in Minnesota, even with their injury woes. Overall, it was a strong second season for Cousins, who improved his game and came through in big spots over the course of the year.
Key Stat from QB Annual: Cousins finished with the No. 4 PFF grade from a clean pocket, but he ranked just 23rd under pressure. 

https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-best-quarterbacks-ahead-of-super-bowl-liv

“A gentleman is someone who can play the accordion, but doesn't." - Tom Waits

Liked:
#1 · Jan 29, 6:10 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I agree but he has got to have one of the worst feel for the rush that I have ever seen from a top line starter. I wish he had better pocket presence but probably too late for that. Maybe Case could borrow him his.

Liked:
#2 · Jan 29, 6:13 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"MaroonBells" said: Key Stat from QB Annual: Cousins finished with the No. 4 PFF grade from a clean pocket, but he ranked just 23rd under pressure. 


This is the key stat.  You can't keep a clean pocket every time and for a QB like Cousins the pocket has to be absolutely perfect.  I am not surprised with the #6 ranking, because he played fantastic against teams with losing records.  I would be more interested to see where he ranks against teams with winning records.  

Liked:
#3 · Jan 29, 6:17 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Despite what's going to in the secondary, we really need to focus on the O line if we are going to maximize our investment.

Liked:
#4 · Jan 29, 6:32 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"BarrNone55" said: Despite what's going to in the secondary, we really need to focus on the O line if we are going to maximize our investment.
This. So this.
Liked:
#5 · Jan 29, 6:34 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"BarrNone55" said: Despite what's going to in the secondary, we really need to focus on the O line if we are going to maximize our investment.
I agree. I'd even sacrifice Harris for a couple of good moves on the o-line. Here's a dream...

LT- Trent Williams (trade D3)
LG - Tristan Wirfs (D1)
C - Garrett Bradbury 
RG - Josh Kline (or Samia)
RT - Brian O'Neill

Liked:
#6 · Jan 29, 6:47 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"BarrNone55" said: Despite what's going to in the secondary, we really need to focus on the O line if we are going to maximize our investment.
I agree. I'd even sacrifice Harris for a couple of good moves on the o-line. Here's a dream...

LT- Trent Williams (trade D3)
LG - Tristan Wirfs (D1)
C - Garrett Bradbury 
RG - Josh Kline (or Samia)
RT - Brian O'Neill



I agree on addressing the OL. Not trying to be mean but there is a very slim chance on getting Trent Williams AND Tristan Wirfs. I believe we would have to trade up to take Wirfs which would mean we would lose a pick that would potentially be included in the Trent Williams trade. I'd really like to make a run at Scherffs and then address Reiff however we deem necessary. 

Liked:
#7 · Jan 29, 6:54 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I think they can do both regarding the OL and secondary...

This is going to be the last rodeo for a lot of the Vikings players, coaches and front office as we know them today if they don't.

A big flush or a big trophy???

Liked:
#8 · Jan 29, 6:58 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Hawkvike25" said:
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"BarrNone55" said: Despite what's going to in the secondary, we really need to focus on the O line if we are going to maximize our investment.
I agree. I'd even sacrifice Harris for a couple of good moves on the o-line. Here's a dream...

LT- Trent Williams (trade D3)
LG - Tristan Wirfs (D1)
C - Garrett Bradbury 
RG - Josh Kline (or Samia)
RT - Brian O'Neill



I agree on addressing the OL. Not trying to be mean but there is a very slim chance on getting Trent Williams AND Tristan Wirfs. I believe we would have to trade up to take Wirfs which would mean we would lose a pick that would potentially be included in the Trent Williams trade. I'd really like to make a run at Scherffs and then address Reiff however we deem necessary. 


I did say it was a dream. I'm also not convinced that Wirfs is a high 1st rounder. You don't like Wirfs there then draft Jones or PTW, put them at LG. Or Harris. Or Muti. Or Biadasz. You see my point. 

Liked:
#9 · Jan 29, 7:23 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"Hawkvike25" said:
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"BarrNone55" said: Despite what's going to in the secondary, we really need to focus on the O line if we are going to maximize our investment.
I agree. I'd even sacrifice Harris for a couple of good moves on the o-line. Here's a dream...

LT- Trent Williams (trade D3)
LG - Tristan Wirfs (D1)
C - Garrett Bradbury 
RG - Josh Kline (or Samia)
RT - Brian O'Neill



I agree on addressing the OL. Not trying to be mean but there is a very slim chance on getting Trent Williams AND Tristan Wirfs. I believe we would have to trade up to take Wirfs which would mean we would lose a pick that would potentially be included in the Trent Williams trade. I'd really like to make a run at Scherffs and then address Reiff however we deem necessary. 


I did say it was a dream. I'm also not convinced that Wirfs is a high 1st rounder. You don't like Wirfs there then draft Jones or PTW, put them at LG. Or Harris. Or Muti. Or Biadasz. You see my point. 


As a Hawkeye, Tristan Wirfs is a bad man. Kid was a heck of an athlete in high school as well, which included multiple shot put and discus championships, plus a state wrestling championship his senior year. I think he tears it up at the combine and is a lock for a top 10 pick. I'm also not so certain that the Vikes dont trade up in the draft. Wishful thinking

Liked:
#10 · Jan 29, 7:42 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Hawkvike25" said:
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"Hawkvike25" said:
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"BarrNone55" said: Despite what's going to in the secondary, we really need to focus on the O line if we are going to maximize our investment.
I agree. I'd even sacrifice Harris for a couple of good moves on the o-line. Here's a dream...

LT- Trent Williams (trade D3)
LG - Tristan Wirfs (D1)
C - Garrett Bradbury 
RG - Josh Kline (or Samia)
RT - Brian O'Neill



I agree on addressing the OL. Not trying to be mean but there is a very slim chance on getting Trent Williams AND Tristan Wirfs. I believe we would have to trade up to take Wirfs which would mean we would lose a pick that would potentially be included in the Trent Williams trade. I'd really like to make a run at Scherffs and then address Reiff however we deem necessary. 


I did say it was a dream. I'm also not convinced that Wirfs is a high 1st rounder. You don't like Wirfs there then draft Jones or PTW, put them at LG. Or Harris. Or Muti. Or Biadasz. You see my point. 


As a Hawkeye, Tristan Wirfs is a bad man. Kid was a heck of an athlete in high school as well, which included multiple shot put and discus championships, plus a state wrestling championship his senior year. I think he tears it up at the combine and is a lock for a top 10 pick. I'm also not so certain that the Vikes dont trade up in the draft. Wishful thinking


It would take the Vikes 1st,2nd,and 3rd round picks to move up to 10 to get words.  No way Rick pays that premium for a OG....and he shouldn't with as many other holes as this roster has.

Liked:
#11 · Jan 30, 5:37 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I mostly agree with you Jimmy, but Wirfs is a Tackle. I wouldnt be surprised if the Vikes trade up to around 15 depending on if a guy they like falls there. 

Liked:
#12 · Jan 30, 7:08 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Rick rarely trades up on d-day, he trades down and DOMINATES THE 7th ROUND!!! B)

Liked:
#13 · Jan 30, 8:38 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I’m all in on continuing to build the OLine.  It’s the shortest path to building a robust
team.  I know we’re a zone team, but if
they can find someone who’s beefy but relatively fast at LG I think that would go
a long way to giving us competency at multiple offensive strategies over a guy
who’s a lightweight speed guy. 

Liked:
#14 · Jan 30, 8:51 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"comet52" said: Rick rarely trades up on d-day, he trades down and DOMINATES THE 7th ROUND!!! B)
He traded back into the first round to get both Harrison Smith and Teddy and traded up to get Cook, so he has definitely made some pretty significant moves to trade up when there is a player there he really wants.  
Liked:
#15 · Jan 30, 8:58 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"comet52" said: Rick rarely trades up on d-day, he trades down and DOMINATES THE 7th ROUND!!! B)
I know everyone complains when we trade down for 7th rounders. But after hitting on Bisi, Odenigbo, Kearse, Weatherly, and Stephen in the 7th round, it might be time to stop. 
Liked:
#16 · Jan 30, 9:15 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"comet52" said: Rick rarely trades up on d-day, he trades down and DOMINATES THE 7th ROUND!!! B)
I know everyone complains when we trade down for 7th rounders. But after hitting on Bisi, Odenigbo, Kearse, Weatherly, and Stephen in the 7th round, it might be time to stop. 
Plus, it helps you with UDFA as you can get them on a rookie pay scale and you don't have to get into a bidding war. Especially with a team that has to save cap. Trade down and that is how you save money as well. Just a thought on my part and you can tell me I am wrong. It's cool. 
Liked:
#17 · Jan 30, 9:25 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Canthony" said:
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"comet52" said: Rick rarely trades up on d-day, he trades down and DOMINATES THE 7th ROUND!!! B)
I know everyone complains when we trade down for 7th rounders. But after hitting on Bisi, Odenigbo, Kearse, Weatherly, and Stephen in the 7th round, it might be time to stop. 
Plus, it helps you with UDFA as you can get them on a rookie pay scale and you don't have to get into a bidding war. Especially with a team that has to save cap. Trade down and that is how you save money as well. Just a thought on my part and you can tell me I am wrong. It's cool. 
I don't think it's about money as much as it's about analytics and recognizing tiers in the draft. If, for example, there is a cluster of players between 75 and 100 that you have even grades on, you might as well trade down in that area and pick up a few more rolls of the dice. 
Liked:
#18 · Jan 30, 9:38 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I hope they quit taking special teams LBs with the 5th pick. Waste.

Liked:
#19 · Jan 30, 9:45 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"kmillard" said: I hope they quit taking special teams LBs with the 5th pick. Waste.
Brothers, Downs, Smith. Imagine if they had to start in place of Barr or Kendricks. And the low round O-Line picks certainly didn't wow anyone until Udoh.

There's context here. For one, Rick has picked more in the late rounds than anyone else. Last stat I saw it was by a decent margin. So he's gotten more chances to hit. And his hits haven't been across all positions. O-Line, DTs (depending on Watts), LBs, TEs, all misses. The hits have been DE, WR, S and CB. 

It's weird cuz we're talking 2 DEs that could easily have been 4 if Bower wasn't always hurt and what happened with Aruna? Diggs, Thielen,  Bisi. Harris and Kearse. Hill and hopefully Boyd. They've clearly got their profile down to a T for those roles but not the others.

Imagine if Rick had hit on a LG or 3T already. This would be a very different offseason. Now, I think he needs to spend a high pick on each position. CB too, probably. But by the middle rounds I'll be ok with the slew of trade downs because for the most part it's working. And the team needs more depth at the spots he's hit on like DE, WR and Safety.

This is such an interesting Draft. He's got some glaring holes to fill. The Tackle Class is top heavy and he might see a run before #25. Does he trade up? The Guard Class doesn't have the top end talent of the last few years but is deep at the 2nd Tier and he can find real value in the 2nd or 3rd. Or grab a Center and move him over. 3T has talent early but I doubt he can find a Starter outside of the first or second rounds. CB is a little thin at the top but has good value in the 2nd and 3rd.

I'd almost be shocked to see Rick sit still. Just have a feeling he'll move up and down as the runs happen in the value spots. Get your popcorn ready!

Liked:
#20 · Jan 30, 10:14 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Canthony" said:
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"comet52" said: Rick rarely trades up on d-day, he trades down and DOMINATES THE 7th ROUND!!! B)
I know everyone complains when we trade down for 7th rounders. But after hitting on Bisi, Odenigbo, Kearse, Weatherly, and Stephen in the 7th round, it might be time to stop. 
Plus, it helps you with UDFA as you can get them on a rookie pay scale and you don't have to get into a bidding war. Especially with a team that has to save cap. Trade down and that is how you save money as well. Just a thought on my part and you can tell me I am wrong. It's cool. 
Totally agree.  Rick wants more picks so he doesn’t have to compete on the UDFA market for guys that he likes.  If there’s a guy you want, you don’t have to worry about him just liking a different town or team better.  You don’t have to worry about another team just paying more.  You just pick your guy and he’s yours.  Then when its time to go get those UDFAs your list of needs you need to fill is a little bit smaller and you can focus on them more.
Liked:
#21 · Jan 30, 10:31 AM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship PFF grades the QBs in 2019.
Return to top ↑

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!