Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Draft Thought
#1
If we draft a CB with our first pick, we probably won't sign one of Waynes or Alexander to an extension.  The money saved could allow us to sign Richardson instead.

As hard as it is to find and prepare a CB for Zimmer's scheme, finding a 3T of Richardson's ability is even harder.  So it definitely makes sense.

Also, there should be a decent OG for us at our pick in the second round.
Reply

#2
I really dislike the idea of being a team that needs to pick a CB in the top 2 rounds every year. The rookies seem to be lost for 2 years, so replacing them in the draft may not help anyway. IMO Zimmer needs to let go of Newman; great player but would Waynes and Alexander get up to speed faster if he wasn't taking time from them? I would prefer if Zimmer found some CB projects in free agency that were younger - every year there are guys 30 or under that are bargains and do well (like Patrick Robinson last year).

It's been said before by me and others, but...I wish our talented defensive coaching staff could turn some later picks or free agent pickups into significant contributors.
Reply

#3
I think they will do something at corner and will do it early.  Right now, they only have 3 corners you want playing any snaps.

Sherels is not useful as a corner and he is not all of a sudden going to magically get better there either.  Richardson and Tocho are unknowns.

They have added some WR competition for cheap and even brought in a LB but have not done anything at corner.  Yet.

With 17 days left until the draft it is becoming more and more clear, to me, that they will select a corner early.

I would say that adding a player like Oliver, for example, and giving him a year to learn the defense and get more coaching would give them some flexibility in terms of negotiations with Waynes.

Waynes may command top 5 or top 10 corner money when they do his extension.  Will he get as much as Kyle Fuller received which was a 4 year 56 mil deal?  Or will it be closer to what Dre Kirkpatrick received which was a 5 year 52.5 mil deal?

Either way they could be looking at having two corners both making over 10 mil per year.  You got 2 DEs, 1 DT and hopefully 2 if they sign Richardson next year, 2 LBs, 1 CB, and 1 S on defense all potentially making top dollar.

With the offense also needing some attention (Diggs and a bump up for Thielen), they could be hard pressed to have 9 defenders making 10 mil per year or over.

I don't think it would come down to them not liking Waynes or Alexander who they do not really have to worry about until the start of 2020. 

It likely will come down to where they want to spend the money.


Reply

#4
I hope it's not a corner. One way to ensure minimal first-year contribution is to draft a corner. Does he beat out Rhodes? No. Does he beat out Waynes? No. Does he beat out Alexander going into this 3rd season? Probably not.

Might be a wise move for the future, but I'm just not a big fan of using a 1st round pick on a 4th corner. I'd much prefer we add a veteran here, via trade or maybe a FA after June 1. 

Either way, I'd be surprised if we didn't trade down. 
Reply

#5
The question I have is: Is Zimmer all that good of a D guru if a good chunk of the $$ and high draft picks are all spent on D?  Could someone else get similar production with such a slant toward D players?
Reply

#6
Quote: @"AGRforever" said:
The question I have is: Is Zimmer all that good of a D guru if a good chunk of the $$ and high draft picks are all spent on D?  Could someone else get similar production with such a slant toward D players?
 all the talent in the world is useless without a great scheme and game plan.  I dont know where this player guru shit came from the Zim is supposed to make chicken salad out of chicken shit... IMO his defense is able to do what he wants to do because of the players,  now that doesnt mean that just anybody would be able to get the same or better from a similarly talented roster,  it just means that Zims monster defense needs quality players to make it work.

theres been plenty of proof with other coaches as well,  they have a system and with good players it functions, but when the talent falls away so does their success.  also plenty of coaches that have had a talented pool but cant win shit because their players dont fit what they are doing or they just flat out suck at coaching.
Reply

#7
Quote: @"AGRforever" said:
The question I have is: Is Zimmer all that good of a D guru if a good chunk of the $$ and high draft picks are all spent on D?  Could someone else get similar production with such a slant toward D players?
They go hand in hand. You need a defensive guru to put talented players in the correct positions to make plays. Without talented players you're limited in what you can do schematically and its awfully tough to hide your weakest links. 

On a more detailed level a good defensive coach also helps with the development of players. Being able to take the Danielle Hunter's of the world who have all the traits but don't know how to use them properly and being able to train them makes the biggest impact. The ability to groom mid-round prospects into starting caliber players or more is tremendous value. 


Reply

#8
Quote: @"Geoff Nichols" said:
@"AGRforever" said:
The question I have is: Is Zimmer all that good of a D guru if a good chunk of the $$ and high draft picks are all spent on D?  Could someone else get similar production with such a slant toward D players?
They go hand in hand. You need a defensive guru to put talented players in the correct positions to make plays. Without talented players you're limited in what you can do schematically and its awfully tough to hide your weakest links. 

On a more detailed level a good defensive coach also helps with the development of players. Being able to take the Danielle Hunter's of the world who have all the traits but don't know how to use them properly and being able to train them makes the biggest impact. The ability to groom mid-round prospects into starting caliber players or more is tremendous value. 



I'm in the middle ground, not condemning Zimmer & staff. Some good defensive coaches do need a top surrounding cast - or, another way to look at it is that some really bad defensive units have been populated with high draft picks and/or expensive free agents and incompetent coaching held them back.
That said..."the Danielle Hunter's of the world" have not been numerous since Zimmer joined the Vikings. Actually, we have to say "mid-round prospect into starting caliber player" - without any plurals. I suppose someone will argue that Ben Gedeon counts, but someone else might argue that Hunter, picked #88 overall in the 3rd round, was closer to an early round pick. Vikings have drafted 15 defensive players in rounds 4-7 over the past 4 years, and other than Gedeon, we have special teamers like Kentrell Brothers and Jayron Kearse who have had scant few defensive snaps. The defensive line was wearing down late last year but Stephen Weatherly and Jaleel Johnson remained glued to the bench.
Zimmer is a good defensive coach, no argument. But he has not been much of a "diamond carver", at least not yet.


Reply

#9
Quote: @"Jor-El" said:
@"Geoff Nichols" said:
@"AGRforever" said:
The question I have is: Is Zimmer all that good of a D guru if a good chunk of the $$ and high draft picks are all spent on D?  Could someone else get similar production with such a slant toward D players?
They go hand in hand. You need a defensive guru to put talented players in the correct positions to make plays. Without talented players you're limited in what you can do schematically and its awfully tough to hide your weakest links. 

On a more detailed level a good defensive coach also helps with the development of players. Being able to take the Danielle Hunter's of the world who have all the traits but don't know how to use them properly and being able to train them makes the biggest impact. The ability to groom mid-round prospects into starting caliber players or more is tremendous value. 



I'm in the middle ground, not condemning Zimmer & staff. Some good defensive coaches do need a top surrounding cast - or, another way to look at it is that some really bad defensive units have been populated with high draft picks and/or expensive free agents and incompetent coaching held them back.
That said..."the Danielle Hunter's of the world" have not been numerous since Zimmer joined the Vikings. Actually, we have to say "mid-round prospect into starting caliber player" - without any plurals. I suppose someone will argue that Ben Gedeon counts, but someone else might argue that Hunter, picked #88 overall in the 3rd round, was closer to an early round pick. Vikings have drafted 15 defensive players in rounds 4-7 over the past 4 years, and other than Gedeon, we have special teamers like Kentrell Brothers and Jayron Kearse who have had scant few defensive snaps. The defensive line was wearing down late last year but Stephen Weatherly and Jaleel Johnson remained glued to the bench.
Zimmer is a good defensive coach, no argument. But he has not been much of a "diamond carver", at least not yet.



Already on the roster: 

Xavier Rhodes - Not 100% a testament to Zimmer but was only average before his coaching tenure 
Everson Griffen - Doubled his production since Zimmer took over 
Andrew Sendejo - Wasn't even a league average player and was developed into a starter 

Draft Picks: 

Shamar Stephen (2014) - 7th round pick 
Danielle Hunter (2015) - 3rd round pick 
Jury is still out on Anthony Harris, Jayron Kearse, and the 2017 class. 

So although he isn't a diamond cutter, he's definitely cultivated more talent out of what he's been given than most NFL coaches. Not everyone will be a star and he does deserve some credit for that. 

Reply

#10
I am really hoping they dont go with defense on the first pick.  

The Vikings O line has been a problem for ten years.  Every QB they have put behind it has been punished and injured.  We only have to look back to the playoffs to see what happens when you dont have an adequate O line. Now with the added significant investment in Cousins the Vikes need to invest in starter and QUALITY depth to get the TEAM to the next level and keep them there for the next few years.

I would be very surprised if Rick and Zimmer havent learned this obvious lesson.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 Melroy van den Berg.