Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Scenario 14. Nick Foles
#1
https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/foles-to-vikings-taylor-a-bronco-plus-other-creative-deals-that-would-make-sense/

its a low second for a 1 year 8 million contract. Flip knows him inside out.  
Reply

#2
uhm no..... check that... fuck no.  while yes foles is marginally better than Case talent wise,  IMO you dont spend a 2nd round draft pick on a guy that is only under contract for 1 year and then put you right back in the same situation you are currently in.   
Reply

#3
the way im thinking about it is this.  You can bring back Keenum or Bradford for 15 - 18 million or Foles and Sheldon Richardson for one year at roughly the same money. Makes a very alluring one year window. 
Reply

#4
Quote: @Bullazin said:
the way im thinking about it is this.  You can bring back Keenum or Bradford for 15 - 18 million or Foles and Sheldon Richardson for one year at roughly the same money. Makes a very alluring one year window. 
you can fit richardson in with bradford and a solid #2 and still have your #2 draft pick for an even bigger window.  I will take a risk with Sam over Foles and not having that #2 pick.   if we want to avoid a shit team window in the near future we cant keep trading away higher round draft picks... especially when we are already drafting at the backs of the rounds.
Reply

#5
I would much rather sign Keenum than trade for Foles who was on the verge of retirement. After winning the Super Bowl at 35, how much drive does he really have left to do that all over with a new team? He put together back to back career games that the Vikings and Patriots did not seem prepared for with the RPO that Pederson masterminded. The stars were aligned for him, but I don't think it's repeatable and the Eagles need to make sure Wentz is 100% to start the season. 
Reply

#6
Quote: @JimmyinSD said:
@Bullazin said:
the way im thinking about it is this.  You can bring back Keenum or Bradford for 15 - 18 million or Foles and Sheldon Richardson for one year at roughly the same money. Makes a very alluring one year window. 
you can fit richardson in with bradford and a solid #2 and still have your #2 draft pick for an even bigger window.  I will take a risk with Sam over Foles and not having that #2 pick.   if we want to avoid a shit team window in the near future we cant keep trading away higher round draft picks... especially when we are already drafting at the backs of the rounds.
Right but your scenario costs 10 million more. I am as tired of giving up high picks as anyone, but this window wont last long and you can still extend Foles, hes already earned it.   

Barr, Waynes, Kendricks, are all gonna get paid soon, and not all of them by us. we may have to lean on Mac Alexander and Ben Gedeon more than we want but thats the nature of a salary cap. 

I WANT Teddy, but thats just the fan in me. im starting to lean Cousins logically
Reply

#7
One thing that I think gets overstated: the fear of the Vikings spending big money on a QB.

I think the Vikings would be fine with spending real starting-QB money, though they'd have the leverage that the top-tier defense and offensive tools need compensation as well, to help the QB succeed.  Throwing to guys like Diggs, Thielen, and Rudolph requires paying them as well...something any player/agent has to understand.

I think that Rick would make the deal RIGHT NOW for a $20M+ QB if he knew he was getting value...and the fans would similarly be fine with it if we had a consistent, quality signal-caller for more than 1-2 consecutive seasons.

With the tools on offense and the defense being what it is, finding real quality for 20-25 million per season shouldn't be seen as outrageous...at least, for someone like Cousins.  I'd even be fine with an incentive-heavy contract for Sam, if specialists say that his knees are truly in great shape.  I just want the team to enjoy the consistency that other top clubs have at QB, because we arguably have the rest of the pieces to win now.
Reply

#8
Quote: @Bullazin said:
@JimmyinSD said:
@Bullazin said:
the way im thinking about it is this.  You can bring back Keenum or Bradford for 15 - 18 million or Foles and Sheldon Richardson for one year at roughly the same money. Makes a very alluring one year window. 
you can fit richardson in with bradford and a solid #2 and still have your #2 draft pick for an even bigger window.  I will take a risk with Sam over Foles and not having that #2 pick.   if we want to avoid a shit team window in the near future we cant keep trading away higher round draft picks... especially when we are already drafting at the backs of the rounds.
Right but your scenario costs 10 million more. I am as tired of giving up high picks as anyone, but this window wont last long and you can still extend Foles, hes already earned it.   

Barr, Waynes, Kendricks, are all gonna get paid soon, and not all of them by us. we may have to lean on Mac Alexander and Ben Gedeon more than we want but thats the nature of a salary cap. 

I WANT Teddy, but thats just the fan in me. im starting to lean Cousins logically
but in your scenario you would be going all in on a 35 year old QB with his 3rd team in as many years.  just like case he found lightning in a bottle last year, but I doubt very much that he would have the same success if teams had as much time to prepare for him all off season.  remember when the wildcat kicked the shit out of the patriots?  how long did it take the rest of the league to shut it down..about 1 offseason and it had run its course.

and there is no reason we cant keep our own guys,  as long as we dont get suckered into buying hype.... foles is hype at any price IMO.
Reply

#9
Quote: @TBro said:
I would much rather sign Keenum than trade for Foles who was on the verge of retirement. After winning the Super Bowl at 35, how much drive does he really have left to do that all over with a new team? He put together back to back career games that the Vikings and Patriots did not seem prepared for with the RPO that Pederson masterminded. The stars were aligned for him, but I don't think it's repeatable and the Eagles need to make sure Wentz is 100% to start the season. 
Foles turned 29 yo about a month ago.  Where is 35 coming from?  He was drafted in 2012, same year as Cousins and Keenum (undrafted).
Reply

#10
Quote: @silverjoel said:
@TBro said:
I would much rather sign Keenum than trade for Foles who was on the verge of retirement. After winning the Super Bowl at 35, how much drive does he really have left to do that all over with a new team? He put together back to back career games that the Vikings and Patriots did not seem prepared for with the RPO that Pederson masterminded. The stars were aligned for him, but I don't think it's repeatable and the Eagles need to make sure Wentz is 100% to start the season. 
Foles turned 29 yo about a month ago.  Where is 35 coming from?  He was drafted in 2012, same year as Cousins and Keenum (undrafted).
honestly i didnt look,  i was just going off what TBro mentioned.

either way I would not be trading for him.  he is a great back up option, and even a low level starter IMO,  but i wouldnt give up a 2nd round pick for him at this point. 
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
3 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 Melroy van den Berg.