Posts: 2
Threads: 2
Joined: Mar 2014
Reputation:
0
![[Image: min.png?w=110&h=110&transparent=true]](http://a.espncdn.com/combiner/i?img=/i/teamlogos/nfl/500/min.png?w=110&h=110&transparent=true) 5. Minnesota Vikings2017 record: 9-2
Week 12 ranking: No. 4 ![[Image: rd-arrow.png]](http://a.espncdn.com/i/sportsnation/rd-arrow.png)
Sam Bradford played well before his injury, and Case Keenum has been great with Bradford out. As a result, the Vikings have the best team Total QBR (74) this season. Give credit to the pass protection, too. The Vikings have allowed 12 sacks this year, tied for fewest in the NFL.
win 7 in a row and move down 4 spots.
saw that as well. Not gonna click on their crap link, but who do they have at #3?
Just stupid IMO.
Quote: @golfervike said:
5. Minnesota Vikings2017 record: 9-2
Week 12 ranking: No. 4
Sam Bradford played well before his injury, and Case Keenum has been great with Bradford out. As a result, the Vikings have the best team Total QBR (74) this season. Give credit to the pass protection, too. The Vikings have allowed 12 sacks this year, tied for fewest in the NFL.
win 7 in a row and move down 4 spots.
are these supposed to be where we rank in the league, or in terms of likelihood of winning this week?
I think we all know ESPN is dumb
Quote: @JimmyinSD said:
@ golfervike said:
5. Minnesota Vikings2017 record: 9-2
Week 12 ranking: No. 4
Sam Bradford played well before his injury, and Case Keenum has been great with Bradford out. As a result, the Vikings have the best team Total QBR (74) this season. Give credit to the pass protection, too. The Vikings have allowed 12 sacks this year, tied for fewest in the NFL.
win 7 in a row and move down 4 spots.
are these supposed to be where we rank in the league, or in terms of likelihood of winning this week?
Wetlander posted this in another thread as well, but the methodology from ESPN below:
"Methodology: These rankings are based on which teams voters think would win head-to-head matchups. Higher-ranked teams would be favored against lower-ranked teams. Coming off a win doesn't guarantee a jump, and a loss doesn't guarantee a fall."
Pretty much a joke of a power ranking, especially since the Vikes just held the team that is ranked #3 (Rams) to 7 freaking points...
Quote: @golfervike said:
5. Minnesota Vikings2017 record: 9-2
Week 12 ranking: No. 4
Sam Bradford played well before his injury, and Case Keenum has been great with Bradford out. As a result, the Vikings have the best team Total QBR (74) this season. Give credit to the pass protection, too. The Vikings have allowed 12 sacks this year, tied for fewest in the NFL.
win 7 in a row and move down 4 spots.
Actually, we were ranked #4 last week so we moved down one spot. But it's still completely asinine. And the team he moved ahead of us? The %$!%@#$! Rams, who were #6 and jumped ahead of the Saints, Vikings, and Steelers this week. Nevermind that we completely kicked the shit out of them the week before....
well its widely known that ESPN sucks so... take it for what its worth.
Quote: @SFVikingFan said:
Actually, we were ranked #4 last week so we moved down one spot. But it's still completely asinine. And the team he moved ahead of us? The %$!%@#$! Rams, who were #6 and jumped ahead of the Saints, Vikings, and Steelers this week. Nevermind that we completely kicked the shit out of them the week before....
Don't get me started again...
https://vikefans.com/discussion/#/discus...ff-picture
Scroll towards the bottom.
Quote: @LabGeek said:
@ JimmyinSD said:
@ golfervike said:
5. Minnesota Vikings2017 record: 9-2
Week 12 ranking: No. 4
Sam Bradford played well before his injury, and Case Keenum has been great with Bradford out. As a result, the Vikings have the best team Total QBR (74) this season. Give credit to the pass protection, too. The Vikings have allowed 12 sacks this year, tied for fewest in the NFL.
win 7 in a row and move down 4 spots.
are these supposed to be where we rank in the league, or in terms of likelihood of winning this week?
Wetlander posted this in another thread as well, but the methodology from ESPN below:
" Methodology: These rankings are based on which teams voters think would win head-to-head matchups. Higher-ranked teams would be favored against lower-ranked teams. Coming off a win doesn't guarantee a jump, and a loss doesn't guarantee a fall."
Pretty much a joke of a power ranking, especially since the Vikes just held the team that is ranked #3 (Rams) to 7 freaking points...
Lol that methodology sucks.
Quote: @Viking1987 said:
I think we all know ESPN is dumb
Dumber than a sack of hammers... 
|
