Login

JustInTime · 06-25-2025, 04:06 PM

No shit.

MaroonBells · 06-25-2025, 04:46 PM

Definitely a bit surprising that we took last year's safety room, subtracted Cam Bynum, added one more year to Harry's age and called it good.

purplefaithful · (This post was last modified: 06-25-2025, 05:58 PM by purplefaithful.)

(06-25-2025, 04:46 PM)MaroonBells Wrote: Definitely a bit surprising that we took last year's safety room, subtracted Cam Bynum, added one more year to Harry's age and called it good.

They're banking on some youth and hoping Harry maintains.

I agree with BN, they had 5 picks and it is surprising none of them went to S.

S and RB may be positions they try and fortify this summer and b4 September.

JustInTime · 06-25-2025, 08:09 PM

(06-25-2025, 04:46 PM)MaroonBells Wrote: Definitely a bit surprising that we took last year's safety room, subtracted Cam Bynum, added one more year to Harry's age and called it good.

There are a couple name safeties still floating in the FA ether, but long term prospect is…dim. If the front 7 plays up to potential it might be a moot point. Still, I’d prefer to address a glaring issue a year early as opposed to a year late.

RB
S
C
iDL under 30 are concerns for 26.

Montana Tom · Yesterday, 10:06 AM

Thank heavens someone of a higher authority has identified this gaping need! None of us knew it, we were completely in the dark with no clear consensus of what any of our greatest needs might possibly be.

They have a good grasp of the obvious.

JustInTime · Yesterday, 10:23 AM

(Yesterday, 10:06 AM)Montana Tom Wrote: Thank heavens someone of a higher authority has identified this gaping need! None of us knew it, we were completely in the dark with no clear consensus of what any of our greatest needs might possibly be.

They have a good grasp of the obvious.

Some of us pay for these rare insights.

Ugh

*JimmyinSD* · Yesterday, 10:37 AM

(06-25-2025, 04:06 PM)JustInTime Wrote:

No shit.

was exactly what I was thinking when I clicked on the post.

its amazing that the good folks at PFF have the awareness and insight to see such an obscure potential weakness. They must really be plugged into the pulse of the organization.

Knucklehead · (This post was last modified: Yesterday, 11:28 AM by Knucklehead.)

(Yesterday, 10:37 AM)JimmyinSD Wrote: was exactly what I was thinking when I clicked on the post.

its amazing that the good folks at PFF have the awareness and insight to see such an obscure potential weakness. They must really be plugged into the pulse of the organization.

It's the type of article written while lounging around a pool, sipping on a margarita & Jimmy Buffet playing in the background.

JustInTime · Yesterday, 11:37 AM

(Yesterday, 10:37 AM)JimmyinSD Wrote: was exactly what I was thinking when I clicked on the post.

its amazing that the good folks at PFF have the awareness and insight to see such an obscure potential weakness. They must really be plugged into the pulse of the organization.

Makes you wonder if there’s any sort of editorial oversight. More often than not we get better insight on our team on this site than from those paid to produce content.

Or maybe we’re more in tune than the average Joe.

*JimmyinSD* · Yesterday, 12:46 PM

(Yesterday, 11:37 AM)JustInTime Wrote: Makes you wonder if there’s any sort of editorial oversight. More often than not we get better insight on our team on this site than from those paid to produce content.

Or maybe we’re more in tune than the average Joe.

well we know for a fact that some of the talking heads have used our site for takes as they have at times not even bothered to change the words before going to print.