Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2025 Draft Grades
#1
Ya ya, I know. Takes at least 3 years to grade a draft. This first one comes from Thor Nystrom. Echoes a lot of my thoughts which I’ll put together at some point.

Minnesota Vikings | Draft Grade: D

Last spring’s trades that ultimately led to EDGE Dallas Turner were largely built with equity from this draft. GM Kwesi Adofo-Mensah entered with a league-low four picks and a league-low in total draft equity.

We saw this manifest early with the pick of OG Donovan Jackson. I saw Jackson as a late first-rounder, others saw him as an early second-rounder. But with the consensus top-three OTs, Tyler Booker and Grey Zabel, and the class’ consensus top-4 DTs all off the board before 1.24, the board had fallen poorly for the Vikings.

Adofo-Mensah had no choice but to stick-and-pick the last sure-thing trench option for immediate help. He appeared to be vindicated minutes later when Hosuton bailed out of its slot, presumably because Jackson was no longer available.

In my opinion, Jackson is the best pure guard in this class above Tyler Booker. He will start immediately at LG. Jackson has a premium combination of length—with the longest wingspan in the iOL class—and power in an athletic package. He’s a hammer in the run game.

Jackson deserves huge credit for sacrificing for the team and shifting from LG to LT to replace injured LT Josh Simmons in October. He was sensational in the College Football Playoff, allowing zero sacks and two pressures over four games, including a date with stud Tennessee EDGE James Pearce.

Donovan Jackson is the infinity stone to the top-3 NFL offensive line that the Vikings now boast, capping a stunning offseason transformation of an interior offensive line that had been problematic for years

After Jackson, the Vikings didn’t pick again until 3.97. They traded that pick along with No. 187 to the Houston Texans for Nos. 102 and 142. The Vikings chose Maryland WR Tai Felton at 3.102 – a nod to the team’s precarious receiver depth with a suspension for WR Jordan Addison looming.

Felton has 4.37 speed and both YAC juice and the ability to get downtown. He’s stick-thin, though, and lacks play strength – he will need to prove he can get off the line against press-cover bullies, and he needs to clean up his ball skills. Felton dropped eight balls last year, and particularly seemed to have an issue when jostled at the catch point.

There’s long-term starter ceiling in Felton’s profile, but it comes with risk. The same could be said of fourth-round EDGE Tyrion Ingram-Dawkins. Ingram-Dawkins is an eye-of-the-beholder ball of play. He’s young, he’s athletic, and he has a rangy frame. If you squint, you can see a long-term starting 3-4 defensive end. If you want to see the glass half-empty, you’ll perceive him as an unfinished product with a tweener profile – two years away from being two years away.

The Vikings traded back from their fifth-round pick, multiplying it into Nos. 201 and 202 via trade with the Rams. With the first of those picks, Minnesota took LB Kobe King, who I ranked closer to the slot they had traded down from. Quietly, the Vikings had a lack of linebacker depth, with little on the roster proven behind the starters. King should provide quality depth.

The Vikings’ depth at the TE position was also precarious, so it wasn’t a surprise that the other selection was used on a tight end. I think it was a mistake to take Pittsburgh’s Gavin Bartholomew over Nebraska’s Thomas Fidone II, who went shortly thereafter.

Adofo-Mensah told the media over the weekend that, in the circumstance that he was in, hitting it down the fairway was the best course of action. That’s what he did, adding an immediate starter at LG while fleshing out the roster’s depth.
“Hell is empty and all the devils are here”

Shakespeare 
Reply

#2
As with any Draft, there's usually a range of thought on it. I think it was an effective one, which I loved, but not flashy which usually means its being given lower grades initially. I do like reading other thoughts on it and the rationale, looking forward to reading your review on the Draft (and any others). Thor does a nice job explaining his particular thoughts.
[-] The following 1 user Likes StickierBuns's post:
  
Reply

#3
It's a better draft when you factor in Dallas Turner as part of it and Sam Howell. I think under the circumstances coming away with a likely day 1 starter that rounds out the offensive line overhaul and turns a weakness into a strength is a win. As hard as I am on Kwesi, I give him credit for learning from prior mistakes and not duplicating them. Games are won in the trenches and we were out physicalled in the games we lost with an obvious disperity. I think he could have easily gotten into the "I need to add picks" at the expense of taking a really good player and he didn't do that. He stuck and took a player who can start and make a difference from day 1. I think that's all you could really ask for out of this draft
[-] The following 3 users Like supafreak84's post:
  
Reply

#4
Seeing some Draft grades coming in, all taken with a grain of salt of course. SI.com's Gilberto Marzano gave the Viking's selections a B+, best in the NFCN. CBS Sports' Chris Trapasso gave it an A. Chad Reuter at NFL.com gave it a B. In 
@MelKiperESPN 2025 NFL Draft grades, he gave the @Vikings a B-.

Some that saw it differently was PFF.com, which gave it a C-....and Nate Davis at USA Today a C.
Reply

#5
Grades handed out immediately after the draft are just so stupid. Because I mean, what the hell are you grading? How you personally feel about it? How closely a draft followed consensus? 

That said, very unSEXY draft. IOL in the 1st, whom I loved, but still.  Then we get jumped for Sai'vion Jones (convince me otherwise) and took a player not many were familiar with at a position not many felt we needed. Felton looks like he's got some real juice and Speedy's in a contract year, so you can see the wisdom there. But after Jackson this was a sister kisser of a draft. Sometimes those end up being the best ones so we'll have to see. 

If Donovan Jackson starts day one and makes us recall the days of Randall McDaniel, and if Tai Felton becomes an early contributor, I think we'll like this draft a year from now.
Reply

#6
(Today, 03:24 AM)JustInTime Wrote: We saw this manifest early with the pick of OG Donovan Jackson. I saw Jackson as a late first-rounder, others saw him as an early second-rounder. But with the consensus top-three OTs, Tyler Booker and Grey Zabel, and the class’ consensus top-4 DTs all off the board before 1.24, the board had fallen poorly for the Vikings.

I don't think they would've taken Booker even if he were there. Same with Grant. 

Was talking to Matthew Coller about this. He said Jackson was a bit of a reach because Arif Hasan's well researched consensus board had him at 40. But I suspect Arif uses too many boards and who knows where they come from and how old they are. I think most recent mocks had Jackson going in the late 20s. Some as early as 18. By far the most likely destination was Houston at 25 and we now know they would've taken him if we didn't.
Reply

#7
I thought it was a good draft to be honest. IMO the best G in the class. He wouldn't have made it past 25 and I firmly believe that. Felton is a baller and a player the Vikings and KOC really wanted. We got our wish. Kobe King was a MLB that I liked a ton. He is a beast and will be all over the ball carrier. The draft went well for the limited picks we had. I am a little surprised with no RB. The real issue I had, no DT when they were there for the taking. That part baffles me. It got me thinking, are we building to strictly to go for the SB on JJs rookie deal? Almost seems that way. If that is the case, I am fine with it.

People are weird. They aren't better than anyone that works in the NFL. This isn't Madden. Sometimes things are just a waste of my time.
[-] The following 1 user Likes Canthony's post:
  
Reply

#8
With so few picks and the big gap between 24 and 97... I think we did fine. If Jackson is as good as the Vikings and draft analysts think he is and he solidifies a top 5 OL for JJ McCarthy, this was a good draft.

I wasn't expecting much without a 2nd rounder and we didn't dip into our early picks next year. I think this year is all about evaluating JJ and giving him the best chance to succeed out of the gate. Majorly upgraded OL, added a power RB, fortified the defensive line, and added another young WR to a strong room.

BOOM
[-] The following 3 users Like MAD GAINZ's post:
  
Reply

#9
(8 hours ago)MAD GAINZ Wrote: With so few picks and the big gap between 24 and 97...  I think we did fine.  If Jackson is as good as the Vikings and draft analysts think he is and he solidifies a top 5 OL for JJ McCarthy, this was a good draft.

I wasn't expecting much without a 2nd rounder and we didn't dip into our early picks next year.  I think this year is all about evaluating JJ and giving him the best chance to succeed out of the gate.  Majorly upgraded OL, added a power RB, fortified the defensive line, and added another young WR to a strong room.

BOOM

Yeah, no matter what anyone's opinion is about our free agency class, our draft, positions missed or ignored, one thing you can't argue with is the fact that the Vikings have built the best god damn line we've seen in decades. 

Even the best Vikings OLs have had weaknesses. Mid 70s was strong on the right with Ed White and Ron Yary, but weak on the left. Early 90s boasted McDaniel and Zimmerman on the left, but Todd Kalis at right guard. 2009 had McKinnie and Hutchinson on the left, but Anthony Herrera at right guard. Always a chance that Donovan Jackson is a flat out bust, but if he plays like I think he will, Vikings may have their best ever offensive line.
[-] The following 2 users Like MaroonBells's post:
  
Reply

#10
(8 hours ago)MAD GAINZ Wrote: With so few picks and the big gap between 24 and 97...  I think we did fine.  If Jackson is as good as the Vikings and draft analysts think he is and he solidifies a top 5 OL for JJ McCarthy, this was a good draft.

I wasn't expecting much without a 2nd rounder and we didn't dip into our early picks next year.  I think this year is all about evaluating JJ and giving him the best chance to succeed out of the gate.  Majorly upgraded OL, added a power RB, fortified the defensive line, and added another young WR to a strong room.

BOOM

I like Supa's take re: how Turner could be included in the final, future eval of this draft..

With so few picks and most of them late, I had little expectation beyond maybe depth. Getting a starting OG is a nice prize that absolutely solidifies things for JJM.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 Melroy van den Berg.