What comes first for KOC?

[purplefaithful]

A Lombardi?

Or

A pre-season win?

Lol!! 

I think I heard the Vikings haven't won a pre-season game since like 2019??

[Guest]

I remember last year at this time, some board members had angst about not winning any of the preseason games and were starting to shit on the regime already, lol. 13 wins later.....still shitting on the new regime!  :p

[Guest]

@StickyBun said:
I remember last year at this time, some board members had angst about not winning any of the preseason games and were starting to shit on the regime already, lol. 13 wins later.....still shitting on the new regime!  :p

Oh wow, it's the 13 win argument again....yawn

[Guest]

Have to have depth to win preseason games. We are going to have a hard time feilding a starting defense.

[Guest]

@supafreak84 said:

@StickyBun said:
I remember last year at this time, some board members had angst about not winning any of the preseason games and were starting to shit on the regime already, lol. 13 wins later.....still shitting on the new regime!  :p

Oh wow, it's the 13 win argument again....yawn

Yeah, last year sucked. 

[Guest]

@StickyBun said:

@supafreak84 said:

@StickyBun said:
I remember last year at this time, some board members had angst about not winning any of the preseason games and were starting to shit on the regime already, lol. 13 wins later.....still shitting on the new regime!  :p

Oh wow, it's the 13 win argument again....yawn

Yeah, last year sucked. 

Yes Spielman did a great job assembling that roster 

[Guest]

@supafreak84 said:

@StickyBun said:
I remember last year at this time, some board members had angst about not winning any of the preseason games and were starting to shit on the regime already, lol. 13 wins later.....still shitting on the new regime!  :p

Oh wow, it's the 13 win argument again....yawn

Yes, leave it to the Vikings to become the first team in sports history for whom wins and losses can not be used as a valid metric to evaluate the team.

[Guest]

@MaroonBells said:

@supafreak84 said:

@StickyBun said:
I remember last year at this time, some board members had angst about not winning any of the preseason games and were starting to shit on the regime already, lol. 13 wins later.....still shitting on the new regime!  :p

Oh wow, it's the 13 win argument again....yawn

Yes, leave it to the Vikings to become the first team in sports history for whom wins and losses can not be used as a worthwhile metric to evaluate the team.

Yes and most of us are using the LOSS in the game that mattered most as the worthwhile metric for evaluation. 

[Guest]

@StickyBun said:
I remember last year at this time, some board members had angst about not winning any of the preseason games and were starting to shit on the regime already, lol. 13 wins later.....still shitting on the new regime!  :p

I used to agree with those who though we should be playing our starters in the preseason, but no longer. The risk of a key injury that derails the entire season is just too high. And I think the starters get all they need in the joint practices. 

Last year is a good example. Starters didn't play at all in the preseason and the Vikings came out week one and played what was probably their most complete game of the year. 

[Guest]

@supafreak84 said:

@StickyBun said:
I remember last year at this time, some board members had angst about not winning any of the preseason games and were starting to shit on the regime already, lol. 13 wins later.....still shitting on the new regime!  :p

Oh wow, it's the 13 win argument again....yawn

Why not?  It's true and a fact...