Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Good Ol Joe and the DOJ
#1
People that don’t understand that this is almost certainly the most corrupt presidency in US history are either blissfully ignorant or have an agenda in mind….   So, they’re telling the media what they can report, the FBI who to arrest, trying to repeal second amendment rights, trying to falsely implicate a presidential opponent, and committing treason by selling out to foreign governments.  And a certain part of the populace knowingly supports these policies.  Oh, and they’re trying to force people to knowingly get jabbed with an experimental vaccine.  But, it’s not a power grab for the political and societal elite, it’s all for our own good.  Sheeple….


https://www.zerohedge.com/political/doj-trying-jail-star-witness-against-hunter-biden-eve-congressional-testimony
Reply

#2
Zerohedge. The MotherJones of alt right media. 
Reply

#3
This from a guy who voted for Lori Lightfoot.  Lol

https://johnkassnews.com/where-have-you-gone-woodward-and-bernstein/
Reply

#4
Quote: @AGRforever said:
Zerohedge. The MotherJones of alt right media. 
Anything in the article you found factually incorrect?
Reply

#5
Quote: @Waterboy said:
@AGRforever said:
Zerohedge. The MotherJones of alt right media. 
Anything in the article you found factually incorrect?

I don't read your zerohedge crap.  Its bullshit right wing propaganda that you suckle it up like its fact. They get paid for clicks.  The more bullshit they write, the more you conspiracy nuts eat it up.  Thus seeing their ads.  Thus paying the bills. 
Reply

#6
Quote: @AGRforever said:
@Waterboy said:
@AGRforever said:
Zerohedge. The MotherJones of alt right media. 
Anything in the article you found factually incorrect?

I don't read your zerohedge crap.  It’s bullshit right wing propaganda that you suckle it up like it’s fact. They get paid for clicks.  The more bullshit they write, the more you conspiracy nuts eat it up.  Thus seeing their ads.  Thus paying the bills. 
So basically, you”re admittedly uninformed to even discuss the topic?
Reply

#7
WOW, that site is a special kind of echo chamber!  Gotta be a fave with some former regulars from here...!

That "article" is such an obvious opinion piece, the editor of a high school news site would've chided the reporter.  Journalism dies and becomes partisan drone-ism in working for crap sites like that...

...which is how I also feel about "Huffpost", "Salon", "Newsmax", etc.
Reply

#8
Quote: @Zanary said:
WOW, that site is a special kind of echo chamber!  Gotta be a fave with some former regulars from here...!

That "article" is such an obvious opinion piece, the editor of a high school news site would've chided the reporter.  Journalism dies and becomes partisan drone-ism in working for crap sites like that...

...which is how I also feel about "Huffpost", "Salon", "Newsmax", etc.
Again, which part is factually incorrect in either article?  Many writers have opinions, I'm just asking about any factually incorrect statements that you see in the articles?  BTW, the article writer of the second link voted for Lori Lightfoot.  So, there's that..
Reply

#9
Quote: @Waterboy said:
@Zanary said:
WOW, that site is a special kind of echo chamber!  Gotta be a fave with some former regulars from here...!

That "article" is such an obvious opinion piece, the editor of a high school news site would've chided the reporter.  Journalism dies and becomes partisan drone-ism in working for crap sites like that...

...which is how I also feel about "Huffpost", "Salon", "Newsmax", etc.
Again, which part is factually incorrect in either article?  Many writers have opinions, I'm just asking about any factually incorrect statements that you see in the articles?  BTW, the article writer of the second link voted for Lori Lightfoot.  So, there's that..
I just find it...we'll go with "funny"...what you snarl about "sheeple" with "agendas", then post an article from an echo chamber which will be by and for very agenda'd people all herding toward one direction...like, well, ewe know....
Reply

#10
Quote: @Zanary said:
@Waterboy said:
@Zanary said:
WOW, that site is a special kind of echo chamber!  Gotta be a fave with some former regulars from here...!

That "article" is such an obvious opinion piece, the editor of a high school news site would've chided the reporter.  Journalism dies and becomes partisan drone-ism in working for crap sites like that...

...which is how I also feel about "Huffpost", "Salon", "Newsmax", etc.
Again, which part is factually incorrect in either article?  Many writers have opinions, I'm just asking about any factually incorrect statements that you see in the articles?  BTW, the article writer of the second link voted for Lori Lightfoot.  So, there's that..
I just find it...we'll go with "funny"...what you snarl about "sheeple" with "agendas", then post an article from an echo chamber which will be by and for very agenda'd people all herding toward one direction...like, well, ewe know....
Can you write this in English please?  From what I think you’re trying to convey, you’re seriously arguing that Zerohedge has been less accurate than other media outlets like MsNBC, CNN, and the broadcast media. What about the social media like Google, Facebook, and old Twitter that have proven collusion pertaining to Covid, Hunter’s laptop, and Russian Collusion lies?  Zerohedge has been far more accurate and above board than any of them. Of course, when you’re disingenuous from the start or maybe just somewhat out there, facts don’t really matter.  It’s much more about just throwing out accusatiins where it suits you. 
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 Melroy van den Berg.