Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Follow the Science
#1
We were told that to think that  the virus originating from a Chinese-Wuhan lab....was conspiracy.  Or racism. 

Tom Cotton repeats debunked conspiracy theory about coronavirus - The Washington Post

Facebook, censored such ideas.  Facebook reverses censorship of WSWS article debunking “Wuhan Lab” conspiracy theory - World Socialist Web Site


By way of an unforgivable (but very revealing) act of silence, several scientists now admit to having misled the country for more than a year by covering up their belief that the coronavirus lab leak theory is valid enough to warrant investigation.
In other words, here’s one more reason to never again trust the scientific community.
What we have here is an astonishing admission and one more reason not to believe the so-called scientific consensus about ANYTHING, most especially life-altering issues such as Global Warming or Climate Change or whatever these charlatans call it today.

Think about it…
If a herd of scientists is willing to lie through an act of omission about the lab leak, imagine the other lies they’re telling us — or are allowing to be told — when it comes to everything else.
Far-left NBC News reports:
Quote:[Alina] Chan was one of 18 scientists who published a letter in the journal Science last month calling for a more in-depth investigation into the virus’s origin that takes into account theories about both natural occurrence and laboratory spillovers. The letter helped kick-start a new round of calls to investigate the “lab leak hypothesis,” including demands from President Joe Biden and several leading scientists.

Chan said there had been trepidation among some scientists about publicly discussing the lab leak hypothesis for fear that their words could be misconstrued or used to support racist rhetoric about how the coronavirus emerged. Trump fueled accusations that the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a research lab in the city where the first Covid-19 [Chinese coronavirus] cases were reported, was connected to the outbreak, and on numerous occasions he called the pathogen the “Wuhan virus” or “kung flu.”
“At the time, it was scarier to be associated with Trump and to become a tool for racists, so people didn’t want to publicly call for an investigation into lab origins,” she said.
NOTE: Although she’s named in the NBC report, Alina Chan’s one of the very few who did not remain quiet. She’s maintained the validity of the lab leak theory from the beginning.
If you read between the lines, what happened here is obvious… A herd of quislings with scientific degrees allowed themselves to be so intimidated by the toxicity fabricated around Trump by the political, media, and academic establishment that they covered up something they believe to be true — that the lab leak theory is credible enough to warrant investigation.
So here’s what we now know… When given a choice between telling the public a vital truth or living through the social discomfort of being “associated” with someone the establishment loathes, to retain the establishment’s good opinion, moral cowards who call themselves scientists will cover up the truth
Reply

#2


JS:  "Science has eased the suffering....that has been caused....by science. The disease is the same name as the lab!” he repeatedly said, saying, “That’s f–ed up.”
Reply

#3
Government scientists makes a claim.  Other scientists refute or question that claim.  Social media censors the non-government scientists by “fact checking”using the government scientists as the authority to debunk other scientists.  Perfectly logical.
Reply

#4
Quote: @PSBLAKE said:
Government scientists makes a claim.  Other scientists refute or question that claim.  Social media censors the non-government scientists by “fact checking”using the government scientists as the authority to debunk other scientists.  Perfectly logical.have
ok synopsis....BUT.... there's supposed to be "neutral refereees".  The "Press".  They're overwhelmingly liberal.  (You know this)

When you have a "point" so proved...vs the liberal counter-point....you announce it.  

Forcing  libs to disagree with Jon Stewart is a game-changer, but will  be fun to watch them try.  






Reply

#5
The previous admin may very well have been right about what they wanted us to believe regarding where the  virus emanated from.

Even to this day we're still not completely certain. We may never have clarity if it came from lab or transmission from god knows where. 

I hope we do someday. The world needs to learn from this to try and prevent another pandemic in our lifetime. 
Reply

#6
I don't disagree its very possible COVID came from a Chinese lab. 
Reply

#7
Quote: @purplefaithful said:
The previous admin may very well have been right about what they wanted us to believe regarding where the  virus emanated from.

Even to this day we're still not completely certain. We may never have clarity if it came from lab or transmission from god knows where. 

I hope we do someday. The world needs to learn from this to try and prevent another pandemic in our lifetime. 
The "circumstantials" are becoming overwhelming....but you're right, not 100% certain yet.  
What's worrisome is that scientists admit to witholding for politics.  
Some wonder why not everyone can get onboard with taking the vaccine. These revelations ( in the OP) dont help.  
We have to stop politically weaponizing science (and law enforcement).  Both "sides". 

Reply

#8
Quote: @purplefaithful said:
The previous admin may very well have been right about what they wanted us to believe regarding where the  virus emanated from.

Even to this day we're still not completely certain. We may never have clarity if it came from lab or transmission from god knows where. 

I hope we do someday. The world needs to learn from this to try and prevent another pandemic in our lifetime. 
It's ok... you can say it,  we all know it...

Trump was right  :p
Reply

#9
What would have done differently?  
Reply

#10
Quote: @BigAl99 said:
What would have done differently?  
Nothing. That's the thing. Ok....Trump might be right. So what does that mean exactly, lol. 
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 Melroy van den Berg.