Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Burning Questions; Vikings, Packers, Lions & Bears (oh my)
#1
No team has won back-to-back NFC North titles since 2014
May 15, 2020 Bears: Can Nick Foles save the QB room?This question works in multiple ways, but it's undoubtedly the most important of the year for Chicago. No matter what general manager Ryan Pace says, the Bears didn't give up a draft pick and maneuver the salary cap so that Foles can take a back seat to Mitchell Trubisky. They want him to compete, if not wrestle the job right from their former first-round pick's hands, and the bevy of faces familiar with Foles on the coaching staff guarantee at least the first part -- the competition -- will happen.
Lions: How long can Matt Patricia survive?Sorry if you feel slighted, Lions fans, but by now you should understand: Patricia is in hot water. Detroit sticking with the coach after a 9-22-1 performance over two years might suggest Patricia coaxed some kind of lifetime commitment from the organization, but owner Martha Ford at least publicly laid down the law after 2019: She expects nothing less than the playoffs in 2020.
Packers: Does Aaron Rodgers have enough help?You can read this one of two ways: 1.) Rodgers is good enough on his own but may or may not have the elite supporting cast to make a Super Bowl run easier; 2.) Rodgers is on enough of a decline that he may need more help to go the distance. Either way, the concern is the same in Green Bay, and it's that the Packers might be squandering the final years of Rodgers in his prime.
Devin Funchess is an underrated breakout candidate with Jimmy Graham no longer around as a red-zone target, but it's still Devin Funchess we're talking about. Packers fans don't need to be reminded that Green Bay drafted exactly zero wide receivers this April, despite no one other than Funchess and Davante Adams entering 2020 with more than 10 starts in a season. So if it seems like Matt LaFleur is banking a ton on his ground game, complete with bruising rookie A.J. Dillon, and the hit-or-miss emergence of guys like tight end Jace Sternberger, well, you'd probably be accurate.
The Packers' defense is talented enough to fuel another playoff push, but with Rodgers, 36, suddenly a down-the-road trade candidate with the surprise selection of first-round QB Jordan Love, it's fair to wonder if their minds aren't already drifting beyond 2020.
Vikings: Can their rebuilt defense hold up down the stretch?All of the Vikings' offensive moves or declarations this offseason -- the re-commitment to Kirk Cousins, the trade of Stefon Diggs, the pledge of allegiance to Dalvin Cook -- signal a doubling-down of what consistently worked in 2019: A ground-and-pound and play-action attack. Even replacing Diggs with LSU's Justin Jefferson should be a win for Cousins, who can feed him over the middle and alleviate any lingering concerns about interior protection up front.
But we might be underrating how much uncertainty there is on the other side of the ball, especially considering how much a conservative, play-action offense relies on a stingy "D." Defense, of course, is coach Mike Zimmer's calling card, but this year, after a shortened offseason, he'll be operating with a new coordinator for the first time since coming to Minnesota. And that's not even mentioning the on-field personnel. Yes, Xavier Rhodes stunk it up in 2019, but losing him, Trae Waynes and Mackensie Alexander means the secondary will be in a near-total rebuild and expecting more than even one of the rookie defensive backs to make an instant impact goes against the odds. The pass rush, meanwhile, hardly has any proven presence beyond Danielle Hunter.
Maybe they can run their way to victory every week, but Zimmer could be in for a frustrating transition elsewhere.
https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/bears...into-2020/

Reply

#2
Agreed that our Defense is finally the bigger question mark compared to the offense, although I still don't think we did enough to improve the offensive line. I think we are an 8-8 team at best this year and miss the playoffs even with the extra Wild Card Team added this season. Zimmer will have to dumb down his scheme for the rookies they are counting on to contribute right away. 
Reply

#3
For Bears fan Tribisky reminds of Ponder and the Vikings. 

Vikings fans had hope but deep down knew Ponder wasn't "the guy".
Reply

#4
Quote: @Mattyman said:
For Bears fan Tribisky reminds of Ponder and the Vikings. 

Vikings fans had hope but deep down knew Ponder wasn't "the guy".
Y'all know those Bears fans are hoping Rogers finishes his career a Chicago Bear. Add him to that team and they're pretty damn potent. 

That is if Fowles doesn't pan-out...
Reply

#5
Quote: @purplefaithful said:
@Mattyman said:
For Bears fan Tribisky reminds of Ponder and the Vikings. 

Vikings fans had hope but deep down knew Ponder wasn't "the guy".
Y'all know those Bears fans are hoping Rogers finishes his career a Chicago Bear. Add him to that team and they're pretty damn potent. 

That is if Fowles doesn't pan-out...
Would Roger's ego allow him to play for less than market?  I dont think that bears team is nearly as potent if they are paying 35 million a year for a QB.
Reply

#6
Quote: @JimmyinSD said:
@purplefaithful said:
@Mattyman said:
For Bears fan Tribisky reminds of Ponder and the Vikings. 

Vikings fans had hope but deep down knew Ponder wasn't "the guy".
Y'all know those Bears fans are hoping Rogers finishes his career a Chicago Bear. Add him to that team and they're pretty damn potent. 

That is if Fowles doesn't pan-out...
Would Roger's ego allow him to play for less than market?  I dont think that bears team is nearly as potent if they are paying 35 million a year for a QB.
Well they certainly don't scare anyone without a QB. 
Reply

#7
Quote: @MaroonBells said:
@JimmyinSD said:
@purplefaithful said:
@Mattyman said:
For Bears fan Tribisky reminds of Ponder and the Vikings. 

Vikings fans had hope but deep down knew Ponder wasn't "the guy".
Y'all know those Bears fans are hoping Rogers finishes his career a Chicago Bear. Add him to that team and they're pretty damn potent. 

That is if Fowles doesn't pan-out...
Would Roger's ego allow him to play for less than market?  I dont think that bears team is nearly as potent if they are paying 35 million a year for a QB.
Well they certainly don't scare anyone without a QB. 
they dont need HOF at the QB position to be contenders,  they just need to upgrade from WTF and they will be there.
Reply

#8
If Fowles is even 1/2 way decent?

Bears are going to make some noise this year...
Reply

#9
Quote: @purplefaithful said:
If Fowles is even 1/2 way decent?

Bears are going to make some noise this year...
and Rogers will be playing with a chip on his shoulder again so he will be bringing what he can...... Zim will be coaching for his job... all I can say is poor lions.
Reply

#10
Quote: @purplefaithful said:
If Fowles is even 1/2 way decent?

Bears are going to make some noise this year...
I'm not buying the Bears, just like I didn't going into last season.  In Nagy's first year (when they went 13-3 or 12-4 or whatever they were),  I think it was a bit of smoke and mirrors.
Their defense was really good, but their offense was predicated on a lot of misdirection and designed plays to get the ball out of Trubisky's hands quickly.  

This past season, they lost that running game that helped set up everything they wanted to do in the passing game and Trubisky couldn't deliver when asked to take on more responsibility in the offense.  Add in the fact that their turnover reliant defense came back to earth the following season (always does), and it put them exactly where I thought it would.

Even if Foles plays well, the Bears seem like a fringe playoff team.  Probably fall somewhere between 7-10 wins if everything goes well for them.  I don't see them as a contender, but good enough to give the Vikings some competition in the division.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 Melroy van den Berg.