Login

Vikergirl · 04-01-2020, 07:32 PM

https://twitter.com/ESPN_Adam/status/124...95361?s=19

04-01-2020, 07:34 PM

Fake

04-01-2020, 07:34 PM

04-01-2020, 07:35 PM

Well, at least we cleared cap for Clowney and Griffen.

04-01-2020, 07:36 PM

I agree, they got me for a second too.

04-01-2020, 07:51 PM

Quote: @VikeMike52 said:
Fake

I know that is why I said not funny.

04-01-2020, 08:00 PM

Quote: @Vikergirl said:

@VikeMike52 said:
Fake
I know that is why I said not funny.

It's not funny because it just wouldn't be big news. I honestly hope we don't extend him.

04-01-2020, 08:04 PM

Quote: @MaroonBells said:

@Vikergirl said:

@VikeMike52 said:
Fake
I know that is why I said not funny.
It's not funny because it just wouldn't be big news. I honestly hope we don't extend him.

*re-block*

04-01-2020, 08:15 PM

Quote: @"BarrNone55" said:

@MaroonBells said:

@Vikergirl said:

@VikeMike52 said:
Fake
I know that is why I said not funny.
It's not funny because it just wouldn't be big news. I honestly hope we don't extend him.
*re-block*

Ha! But think about it. It just doesn't make sense to have $30M going to your SAFETY position. Sure, it's nice to have the best safety duo in the league, but it just doesn't make a lot of cap sense. If you remember, the ONLY argument I understood about the Diggs trade was a best-use-of-resources argument. Did it make sense for a running team to have the best WR tandem in the NFL? Maybe not. It's the same with this.

Now, I would definitely choose to keep Harris over Harry, but Harry's probably not worth as much. Either way, ONE of them paired with a highly drafted safety is a much more sensible way to go....then you can use that 11-14M on help elsewhere.

04-01-2020, 08:20 PM

I don't look at it as having massive dollars tied up at the safety position. I look at as having a roof over our back 4. What we are going to be spending in total for the starting back 4 isn't going to be out of line with the cap. Lots of lightly tested CBs. I want my...safety net.