Abdullah Re-signs

[PurpleCrush]

https://www.vikings.com/news/ameer-abdul...ree-agency

[Guest]

I was really hoping that we'd move on from him. He's an OK, 3rd down back, but not that great of a return man.

[Guest]

Antonio Gibson at 105. Let him return kicks and be RB 4 or WR 4...

[Guest]

I'm fine with the guy. I'm not as down on him as most are. Other than fumbling, he's shown well when he's been in there. Pretty good for RB#3. I mean: Cook, Mattison, Abdullah and Ham? I'd put that up against any 4 deep in the NFL. Any.

[Guest]

They can keep the likes of Jones and Abdullah but not Weatherly? Or Kline? Jones never, ever plays. A UDFA in his spot makes more sense. Boone is RB #3 plus Ham in a pinch. Abdullah is basically a shitty returner, which can always be found in the Draft.

[Guest]

@FSUVike Did you want to pay our #4 DE a contract in the top ten on our roster?

No, no you didn't.

[Guest]

Kline might be a stiff breeze away from permanently having little birdies circling his head.

[Guest]

@"BarrNone55" said:
@FSUVike Did you want to pay our #4 DE a contract in the top ten on our roster?

No, no you didn't.

He'd start over All Vowels, and considering how many kids on this team that will be in their 3rd, 2nd or 1st year being Top 10 is not what it sounds like. Also, you have absolutely zero Intel that the Kline move was anything other than trying to squeeze blood from a stone.

[Guest]

@"BarrNone55" said:
Kline might be a stiff breeze away from permanently having little birdies circling his head.

[Guest]

@StickyBun said:
I'm fine with the guy. I'm not as down on him as most are. Other than fumbling, he's shown well when he's been in there. Pretty good for RB#3. I mean: Cook, Mattison, Abdullah and Ham? I'd put that up against any 4 deep in the NFL. Any.

Don't forget Boone.  Abdullah is a safe depth option and while not spectacular on returns, we've had worse.