Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Deutsche Bank has Trump’s taxes — and loan applications cosigned by Russian oligarchs
#11
Quote: @SFVikeFan said:
@Purple Haze said:
All Im saying is it doesnt matter if you are a Trump supporter or not, the absolute Trump Derangement Syndrome has to stop.  If 19 Obama/Clinton Lawyers, all the Trump hating members of the FBI which had every govt resource at their disposal, all the congressional investigations cannot find evidence of collusion with Russia or anything else they are investigating then its time to move on.  You cant just keep throwing crap up against the wall and hope something sticks like this rawstory site is attempting.  
How many times was Hillary investigated over emails and Benghazi?  13??  Did she complain and cry about it?  Or did she testify under oath?  And 0 charges.

Meanwhile ....

Now it's TDS.  Despite plenty of evidence of lying, questionable conduct and people going to jail ... now we shouldn't be allowed to ask who funds the President and why he continues to support the country that attacked our elections?  Please.  Teetering on treason is not a good look.

If the shoe was on the other foot and parties were reversed, GOP would have already impeached Obama, and now knowing who backs his loans, they'd ask for a firing squad if it was Obama and say a Muslim country co-signing his loans.

Reagan and Eisenhower are rolling over in their graves.   Will Republicans finally choose America over Russia?
Watch, we've seen how this happens before. Trump supporters just keep moving the goal posts. Originally it was "no Russian meddling!" Then it became "well, if they meddled, the Trump campaign didn't know." Then it became "Trump personally had nothing to do with it." And now, the more that it becomes clear cut that he's financially compromised by Russia, it'll either be, "He's a businessman! He can do business with whoever, that doesn't mean anything!" OR "This is all a conspiracy, fake news, liberals, Clinton, blah blah blah." 

These people are in a cult. This is how cults operate. I just find it funny watching them struggle to keep doing mental gymnastics to justify this shit. It's gotta be exhausting.

Meanwhile, Obama wore a tan suit. *world ends*
Reply

#12
Reply

#13
Reply

#14
Quote: @A1Janitor said:
https://www.foxnews.com/media/msnbc-lawrence-odonnell-error-judgment-trump-russia-report

Fake news.  Apology by NBC.  
Is it really though? It very well could end up being fake news but the appology is not about the content. It's about the verification process (he had only one source).
This stuff has really become old...
On one side there are those that latch onto any and everything to discredit Trump and then on the other there are those that defend Trump at any cost no matter what length. 
Just to be clear, I can't stand him and think he has/is setting democracy, human discourse and decency back to the "dark ages".
Reply

#15
Quote: @mblack said:
Is it really though? It very well could end up being fake news but the appology is not about the content. It's about the verification process (he had only one source).
This stuff has really become old...
On one side there are those that latch onto any and everything to discredit Trump and then on the other there are those that defend Trump at any cost no matter what length. 
Just to be clear, I can't stand him and think he has/is setting democracy, human discourse and decency back to the "dark ages".
Trump’s lawyers said nobody guaranteed his loans.  Public records can prove it or not. 

After all they did to investigate him - they either can prove it or not.  Reporting unverified shit is stupid. 

Until verified, it is unsubstantiated gossip.  The ball is not in Trump’s court to prove.  Prove it or drop
it. 
Reply

#16
Quote: @A1Janitor said:
@mblack said:
Is it really though? It very well could end up being fake news but the appology is not about the content. It's about the verification process (he had only one source).
This stuff has really become old...
On one side there are those that latch onto any and everything to discredit Trump and then on the other there are those that defend Trump at any cost no matter what length. 
Just to be clear, I can't stand him and think he has/is setting democracy, human discourse and decency back to the "dark ages".
Trump’s lawyers said nobody guaranteed his loans.  Public records can prove it or not. 

After all they did to investigate him - they either can prove it or not.  Reporting unverified shit is stupid. 

Until verified, it is unsubstantiated gossip.  The ball is not in Trump’s court to prove.  Prove it or drop
it
At the bold...You are right. Now can we apply the same standard to Trump? Or he does not need to drop his lies even when many have proven countless times that he is lying?
Reply

#17
Quote: @mblack said:
@A1Janitor said:
@mblack said:
Is it really though? It very well could end up being fake news but the appology is not about the content. It's about the verification process (he had only one source).
This stuff has really become old...
On one side there are those that latch onto any and everything to discredit Trump and then on the other there are those that defend Trump at any cost no matter what length. 
Just to be clear, I can't stand him and think he has/is setting democracy, human discourse and decency back to the "dark ages".
Trump’s lawyers said nobody guaranteed his loans.  Public records can prove it or not. 

After all they did to investigate him - they either can prove it or not.  Reporting unverified shit is stupid. 

Until verified, it is unsubstantiated gossip.  The ball is not in Trump’s court to prove.  Prove it or drop
it
At the bold...You are right. Now can we apply the same standard to Trump? Or he does not need to drop his lies even when many have proven countless times that he is lying?
What lies?  Name them and show me proof. 
Reply

#18
Oh my God. Orange man bad!!!!!
Reply

#19
Quote: @A1Janitor said:
https://www.foxnews.com/media/msnbc-lawrence-odonnell-error-judgment-trump-russia-report

Fake news.  Apology by NBC.  
Funny how a legal threat will make a coward pull back. And how the hell does the media run with an single anonymous source?  Their hatred blinds them to any notion of objectivity.

Quote:These statements are false and defamatory, and extremely damaging. The
only borrowers under these loans are Trump entities, and Mr. Trump is
the only guarantor. Numerous documents for each of these loans are also
recorded, publicly available and searchable online. Thus, actual malice
can easily be proven based on your reckless disregard of the truth and
unreasonable reliance on an alleged 'source' who you will not even
identify in your story and likely is seeking to mislead you and the
public for political reasons or other ulterior motives.
Reply

#20
Quote: @A1Janitor said:
@mblack said:
@A1Janitor said:
@mblack said:
Is it really though? It very well could end up being fake news but the appology is not about the content. It's about the verification process (he had only one source).
This stuff has really become old...
On one side there are those that latch onto any and everything to discredit Trump and then on the other there are those that defend Trump at any cost no matter what length. 
Just to be clear, I can't stand him and think he has/is setting democracy, human discourse and decency back to the "dark ages".
Trump’s lawyers said nobody guaranteed his loans.  Public records can prove it or not. 

After all they did to investigate him - they either can prove it or not.  Reporting unverified shit is stupid. 

Until verified, it is unsubstantiated gossip.  The ball is not in Trump’s court to prove.  Prove it or drop
it
At the bold...You are right. Now can we apply the same standard to Trump? Or he does not need to drop his lies even when many have proven countless times that he is lying?
What lies?  Name them and show me proof. 
Seriously? Here are a few links...
1. The wall is not being built
2. Dubious Michigan man of Year award
3. China officials did not call Trump for Trade talks
4. White House clarifies that Melania Trump has not met Kim Jong Un 
5. Fact checking Trump


Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 Melroy van den Berg.