Quote: @"BarrNone55" said:
I'm willing to bet no Democrat looked at a crowd of Nazis a nd thought "there's some get fine people" among them.
and this is how we know you aren't interested in honest debate. Yet you accuse others of gaslighting. #BarrHypocrisy
Isn't this one already covered in the other hypocrisy thread?
Quote: @A1Janitor said:
@ medaille said:
I think it would be very naïve to think that this could
somehow be twisted into a Party A = Good, Party B = Bad type of rhetoric.
All around the world people are protesting their corrupt
politicians. It is not liberal or
conservative based. It’s corruption
based, and based on governments that aren’t serving their own people. In Brazil, massive democratic corruption led
to massive protests. Hong Kong was protesting
in a fight against China’s authoritarian government. Yellow Vests in France protesting their
democratic leader. Brexit is clearly
populist against a government that was putting their own needs behind the globalist
UN agenda.
Would things be different if Clinton was elected instead of
Trump? Probably not. Clinton was massively corrupt, which is one
of the key reasons she lost. It’d just
be different people pointing the fingers and different “apologists” or “sympathizers”.
Yeah. If Hillary won, there would have been this russian hoax?!?
The corrupt government isn’t Trump.
Maybe they both Trump and the government are corrupt. Afterall isn't Trump government now?
Quote: @suncoastvike said:
@ A1Janitor said:
@ medaille said:
I think it would be very naïve to think that this could
somehow be twisted into a Party A = Good, Party B = Bad type of rhetoric.
All around the world people are protesting their corrupt
politicians. It is not liberal or
conservative based. It’s corruption
based, and based on governments that aren’t serving their own people. In Brazil, massive democratic corruption led
to massive protests. Hong Kong was protesting
in a fight against China’s authoritarian government. Yellow Vests in France protesting their
democratic leader. Brexit is clearly
populist against a government that was putting their own needs behind the globalist
UN agenda.
Would things be different if Clinton was elected instead of
Trump? Probably not. Clinton was massively corrupt, which is one
of the key reasons she lost. It’d just
be different people pointing the fingers and different “apologists” or “sympathizers”.
Yeah. If Hillary won, there would have been this russian hoax?!?
The corrupt government isn’t Trump.
Maybe they both Trump and the government are corrupt. Afterall isn't Trump government now?
Kind of hard when they won’t talk about the start of the fake russian hoax, the media talks anout conspiracy theories developed by the deep state, and they handcuffed his presidency.
He doesn’t take a salary.
And he is facing Rinos and dems - all corrupt.
Quote: @A1Janitor said:
@ suncoastvike said:
@ A1Janitor said:
@ medaille said:
I think it would be very naïve to think that this could
somehow be twisted into a Party A = Good, Party B = Bad type of rhetoric.
All around the world people are protesting their corrupt
politicians. It is not liberal or
conservative based. It’s corruption
based, and based on governments that aren’t serving their own people. In Brazil, massive democratic corruption led
to massive protests. Hong Kong was protesting
in a fight against China’s authoritarian government. Yellow Vests in France protesting their
democratic leader. Brexit is clearly
populist against a government that was putting their own needs behind the globalist
UN agenda.
Would things be different if Clinton was elected instead of
Trump? Probably not. Clinton was massively corrupt, which is one
of the key reasons she lost. It’d just
be different people pointing the fingers and different “apologists” or “sympathizers”.
Yeah. If Hillary won, there would have been this russian hoax?!?
The corrupt government isn’t Trump.
Maybe they both Trump and the government are corrupt. Afterall isn't Trump government now?
Kind of hard when they won’t talk about the start of the fake russian hoax, the media talks anout conspiracy theories developed by the deep state, and they handcuffed his presidency.
He doesn’t take a salary.
And he is facing Rinos and dems - all corrupt.
Hold on a minute while I poke my eye so I can shed a tear...lol.
Don't sell me on this guy suddenly became different from what he's been since the 80's once he desided to run. Shady and untrustworthy. But hey just my opinion. Don't need the media which I stopped paying attention to anyhow to make that choice. I made it all by myself.
Quote: @suncoastvike said:
@ A1Janitor said:
@ suncoastvike said:
@ A1Janitor said:
@ medaille said:
I think it would be very naïve to think that this could
somehow be twisted into a Party A = Good, Party B = Bad type of rhetoric.
All around the world people are protesting their corrupt
politicians. It is not liberal or
conservative based. It’s corruption
based, and based on governments that aren’t serving their own people. In Brazil, massive democratic corruption led
to massive protests. Hong Kong was protesting
in a fight against China’s authoritarian government. Yellow Vests in France protesting their
democratic leader. Brexit is clearly
populist against a government that was putting their own needs behind the globalist
UN agenda.
Would things be different if Clinton was elected instead of
Trump? Probably not. Clinton was massively corrupt, which is one
of the key reasons she lost. It’d just
be different people pointing the fingers and different “apologists” or “sympathizers”.
Yeah. If Hillary won, there would have been this russian hoax?!?
The corrupt government isn’t Trump.
Maybe they both Trump and the government are corrupt. Afterall isn't Trump government now?
Kind of hard when they won’t talk about the start of the fake russian hoax, the media talks anout conspiracy theories developed by the deep state, and they handcuffed his presidency.
He doesn’t take a salary.
And he is facing Rinos and dems - all corrupt.
Hold on a minute while I poke my eye so I can shed a tear...lol.
Don't sell me on this guy suddenly became different from what he's been since the 80's once he desided to run. Shady and untrustworthy. But hey just my opinion. Don't need the media which I stopped paying attention to anyhow to make that choice. I made it all by myself.
Honestly, I don't think he is a great man. I think he is deeply flawed. But I think he is a rare case where the politician is better than the man behind. He seems to want to do a good job as president and cares about the country.
Quote: @greediron said:
@ suncoastvike said:
@ A1Janitor said:
@ suncoastvike said:
@ A1Janitor said:
@ medaille said:
I think it would be very naïve to think that this could
somehow be twisted into a Party A = Good, Party B = Bad type of rhetoric.
All around the world people are protesting their corrupt
politicians. It is not liberal or
conservative based. It’s corruption
based, and based on governments that aren’t serving their own people. In Brazil, massive democratic corruption led
to massive protests. Hong Kong was protesting
in a fight against China’s authoritarian government. Yellow Vests in France protesting their
democratic leader. Brexit is clearly
populist against a government that was putting their own needs behind the globalist
UN agenda.
Would things be different if Clinton was elected instead of
Trump? Probably not. Clinton was massively corrupt, which is one
of the key reasons she lost. It’d just
be different people pointing the fingers and different “apologists” or “sympathizers”.
Yeah. If Hillary won, there would have been this russian hoax?!?
The corrupt government isn’t Trump.
Maybe they both Trump and the government are corrupt. Afterall isn't Trump government now?
Kind of hard when they won’t talk about the start of the fake russian hoax, the media talks anout conspiracy theories developed by the deep state, and they handcuffed his presidency.
He doesn’t take a salary.
And he is facing Rinos and dems - all corrupt.
Hold on a minute while I poke my eye so I can shed a tear...lol.
Don't sell me on this guy suddenly became different from what he's been since the 80's once he desided to run. Shady and untrustworthy. But hey just my opinion. Don't need the media which I stopped paying attention to anyhow to make that choice. I made it all by myself.
Honestly, I don't think he is a great man. I think he is deeply flawed. But I think he is a rare case where the politician is better than the man behind. He seems to want to do a good job as president and cares about the country.
I hope you're right. I'm a tuff sell I'd be the 1st to admit.The truth is no President has ever done anything to change my life drastically. Ever. I just keep on keeping on. I consider myself middle class. It seems I'm continually pandered to by them all but can hardly ever notice results. Maybe that's a good thing.
Quote: @greediron said:
@ suncoastvike said:
@ A1Janitor said:
@ suncoastvike said:
@ A1Janitor said:
@ medaille said:
I think it would be very naïve to think that this could
somehow be twisted into a Party A = Good, Party B = Bad type of rhetoric.
All around the world people are protesting their corrupt
politicians. It is not liberal or
conservative based. It’s corruption
based, and based on governments that aren’t serving their own people. In Brazil, massive democratic corruption led
to massive protests. Hong Kong was protesting
in a fight against China’s authoritarian government. Yellow Vests in France protesting their
democratic leader. Brexit is clearly
populist against a government that was putting their own needs behind the globalist
UN agenda.
Would things be different if Clinton was elected instead of
Trump? Probably not. Clinton was massively corrupt, which is one
of the key reasons she lost. It’d just
be different people pointing the fingers and different “apologists” or “sympathizers”.
Yeah. If Hillary won, there would have been this russian hoax?!?
The corrupt government isn’t Trump.
Maybe they both Trump and the government are corrupt. Afterall isn't Trump government now?
Kind of hard when they won’t talk about the start of the fake russian hoax, the media talks anout conspiracy theories developed by the deep state, and they handcuffed his presidency.
He doesn’t take a salary.
And he is facing Rinos and dems - all corrupt.
Hold on a minute while I poke my eye so I can shed a tear...lol.
Don't sell me on this guy suddenly became different from what he's been since the 80's once he desided to run. Shady and untrustworthy. But hey just my opinion. Don't need the media which I stopped paying attention to anyhow to make that choice. I made it all by myself.
Honestly, I don't think he is a great man. I think he is deeply flawed. But I think he is a rare case where the politician is better than the man behind. He seems to want to do a good job as president and cares about the country.
Probably one of the most insightful things i have read.
|
