Draft Day 2 Discussion

[Guest]

Probably loose an actual potential player from the practice squad while we cover for tready one last time

[Guest]

Cajuste was taken I think....New England

[Guest]

@SFVikeFan said:
I'd like to see a summary of what all we got for all these trades 

Its in my Dolly Mattison post

[Guest]

@SFVikeFan said:
I'd like to see a summary of what all we got for all these trades 

We traded down 22 spots and got a 5, two 6s and a 7.

[Guest]

@Ralphie said:
Not a bad back for depth.  At 102 we certainly could have done worse.

Read the draft profiles I posted...I wanted Montgomery or Sanders but this guy is a good fit...

[Guest]

Round 4.     120
Round. 5.     152
round. 6.      190, 191, 193
round. 7.      217, 247, 250

[Guest]

Yeah...great.....

5' 11" RB with 4.7 40 speed. In the 3rd.

But we get six....count 'em SIX practice squad players (who may get cut) in the 6th and 7th rounds

[Guest]

As mentioned in chat, our one hope is the Spielman uses those 6s and 7s to move up for actual players in the 4th and 5th.  Vikings went from 81 to 102 for a 5th, 6th, and 7th. Whoopde freaking do.

[Guest]

A bit of a reach after a nice start to the draft (mattison). Just looks like someone you could have gotten after the draft but WDIK?

[Guest]

With the time and effort spent in draft research you would think a front office would have a definitive list of preferred players. This annual scattershot approach seems like an enormous lack of conviction.