Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
OpEd: Zimmer and DeFilippo still not on same page
#1
Are we seeing growing pains in a new relationship or a fundamental divide that creates an unsustainable situation between the head coach and a top assistant?

Mike Zimmer has criticized his offense’s play-calling twice in recent weeks. He has also praised John DeFilippo twice in that span. That math doesn’t equal net zero.
Zimmer’s frustration seems deeply rooted and based on fundamental differences in offensive philosophy.
The head coach desires a run-heavy approach, or at a minimum, a balanced attack. His offensive coordinator abandoned a productive running game Sunday at New England faster than Usain Bolt in the 100 meters.
Zimmer’s repeated criticisms represents a pattern, which hardly makes for a harmonious operation. What remains to be seen is whether this is merely growing pains in a new relationship, or a fundamental divide that creates an unsustainable situation.
The odds don’t favor a lasting partnership if Zimmer and DeFilippo don’t find common ground on philosophy — and more importantly — execution of that vision on game day.
It’s one thing to blow off steam after a tough loss. Zimmer’s disgust following Sunday’s 24-10 loss at New England felt different.
The Vikings ran the ball only 13 times compared to 44 passes. Asked if his team ran the ball enough, Zimmer was curt.
“No,” he said.
When Zimmer was asked what needs to happen to get the offense back on track, his response required minimal effort reading between the lines.
“Same thing I’ve been saying all year,” he said.
Zimmer didn’t pour gas on the fire when he met with reporters on Monday. He said DeFilippo is doing a “good job” and noted that he “tries to do” things that Zimmer finds important.
Zimmer hasn’t concealed his frustration lately though, including a critique about the offense having “too much volume” and trying too hard to “trick” defenses.
If this relationship matches old school-vs.-new school mentalities, an important question lingers: What exactly did Zimmer think he was getting when he hired DeFilippo to replace Pat Shurmur?
In Philadelphia, DeFilippo worked under Doug Pederson, a branch on Andy Reid’s coaching tree. Offensive creativity and volume are a big part of his coaching background. DeFilippo also probably looks around the league at innovative offenses propelled by rocket fuel and sees a new era of football.
Zimmer sees nonsense. His tenets remain unchanged. Run the ball, control the clock, play great defense.
Zimmer praised DeFilippo’s play-calling after the Vikings thumped the Packers last week, but that performance likely revealed more about Green Bay’s players checking out on now-fired coach Mike McCarthy than any breakthrough by DeFilippo’s offense.
Zimmer’s frustration with the play-calling Sunday was understandable. Dalvin Cook gashed the Patriots defense early, rushing for 84 yards on only nine carries, a 9.3-yard average.
The score was close so there was no need to abandon the run in order to play catch-up. But for inexplicable reasons, DeFilippo became one-dimensional.
Zimmer admitted his team possibly “panicked” after the Patriots took a 17-10 lead in the third quarter, thus taking the ball out of Cook’s hands. Not a ringing endorsement for the play-caller.
The Vikings finished seventh in rushing yards last season. They have tumbled to 30th this season. That must drive Zimmer crazy, along with a dramatic increase in turnovers.
Problem is, many times their running game resembles a car smashing into a brick wall. Cook and Latavius Murray take the handoff, get hit at or behind the line and the play results in a minimal gain.
A subpar offensive line isn’t DeFilippo’s fault. The blame for that rests squarely on the shoulders of General Manager Rick Spielman and to a lesser extent Zimmer.
Maybe DeFilippo has arrived at the conclusion that running the ball consistently simply isn’t a viable option behind that offensive line. That leaves him with only one option: Put the ball in Kirk Cousins’ hands.
The Vikings already have attempted 491 passes, third most in the NFL. They attempted 527 passes all of last season, which ranked 21st. That philosophical shift probably drives Zimmer bonkers crazy, too.
http://www.startribune.com/a-dozen-games...501836001/
Reply

#2
It's a passing league. However Mike's right there's been little balance and the gimmicky stuff always seems poorly timed and horribly executed. Flip has not called very many complete games this year. He might be in over his head still. Thought it would take time to gel. Time is something running against us now. 
Reply

#3
This year reminds me of 2016 in so many ways. Do you all remember when Shurmer took over and what that looked like? I say FINALLy address the OG issues, keep the continuity and lets win in 2019.
Reply

#4
Quote: @kmillard said:
This year reminds me of 2016 in so many ways. Do you all remember when Shurmer took over and what that looked like? I say FINALLy address the OG issues, keep the continuity and lets win in 2019.
That's really kinda what I was trying to get at. I didn't mean to come off that Flip should be fired. I think his inexperience is hurting him. Mostly I believe he worked on a game plan in the off season. Then when we started playing he realized the playbook wasn't going to work with this Oline. Pat took over in 2016 mid way. He just did what he could to get through. The next season he went in eyes wide open understanding better what he was dealing with. I do see alot of similarities to 2016 now. Flip like Pat might have to adjust to the fact this team just hasn't placed any emphasise on Oline. That problem really goes higher up the chain. One a really hope they take notice of now.
Reply

#5
Zim’s book contains pages, Flip’s has a touch pad... hmm, generation gap? 
Reply

#6
I noticed that Cousins made a lot of "kill" calls at the LOS.  Perhaps there were alot more runs called... and then Cousins opted to go with a pass option instead?  I deleted the game, so there's no way for me to go back and see how many times we passed the ball after a "kill" call.  Did anyone else notice this?
Reply

#7
Quote: @pumpf said:
I noticed that Cousins made a lot of "kill" calls at the LOS.  Perhaps there were alot more runs called... and then Cousins opted to go with a pass option instead?  I deleted the game, so there's no way for me to go back and see how many times we passed the ball after a "kill" call.  Did anyone else notice this?
I remember a couple at least. And one of them ended up as a run IIRC. 
Reply

#8
Quote: @suncoastvike said:
@kmillard said:
This year reminds me of 2016 in so many ways. Do you all remember when Shurmer took over and what that looked like? I say FINALLy address the OG issues, keep the continuity and lets win in 2019.
That's really kinda what I was trying to get at. I didn't mean to come off that Flip should be fired. I think his inexperience is hurting him. Mostly I believe he worked on a game plan in the off season. Then when we started playing he realized the playbook wasn't going to work with this Oline. Pat took over in 2016 mid way. He just did what he could to get through. The next season he went in eyes wide open understanding better what he was dealing with. I do see alot of similarities to 2016 now. Flip like Pat might have to adjust to the fact this team just hasn't placed any emphasise on Oline. That problem really goes higher up the chain. One a really hope they take notice of now.
Any OC should be prepared for O-Line injuries. I'm sure there's still some teams like Pittsburgh that never seem to get the injury bug. But in Minnesota you should expect an injury plague, not just a bug.
Reply

#9
Well Zimmer will lose his job if he doesn't get the offense fixed.   Cracking about it in pressers won't matter then.   There will be a lot more pressure on him going into year 6 after a mediocre 2018.   There will be talk that he produces or loses the job and it might be real at that point.
Reply

#10
I think the running game thing is accurate and overblown at the same time.

I think Cousins was well under 100 yards passing before we drove the field to end the half. Up to that point our passing game was as awful as our abandonment of the run game. Suddenly we threw the ball right down the field like we figured something out. And then that was it... It was like we decided that was how we needed to beat them and instead of adjusting we just kept grinding at how we ended the half.

It's easy for me to envision a 15-20 carry game last week dropping Cousins' passing totals below 150 yards the way he was trending to halftime. There definitely is no balance.

Dalvin Cook had 8 catches for 22 yards. When you call passing plays as running plays it's a whole lot of wasted effort when that is the result. 8 for 22... yuck.

We need a running game, but i'm not so sure we'd even know what to do with it...
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 Melroy van den Berg.