Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Vikings began revamping key roster spots within hours
#1
First came the emotions.
The Vikings’ wild week started with five quarters of back-and-forth football ending in a 29-29 tie in Green Bay. Players from both teams expressed confusion over how to feel after a game in which both sides had layup chances to win in regulation. Quarterback Kirk Cousins said, “I don’t know what to feel after a tie.” Receiver Adam Thielen added “Am I happy? Am I sad? Am I mad? Angry? I don’t know.”
Then came the phone calls.
Within hours of the game’s awkward finish, the Vikings front office had already placed a call to veteran free-agent receiver Aldrick Robinson. Two of their young receivers, Laquon Treadwell and Stacy Coley, had untimely blunders against the Packers. Robinson said he wasn’t watching the game, but the Vikings quickly put things in motion to attain his services and eventually release Coley.
“I was actually on a flight going somewhere else to do another workout,” Robinson said Wednesday. “Then I got off the flight, and that’s when I heard that I was coming here.”
The reverberations didn’t stop with Robinson, though.
General Manager Rick Spielman acquired three veterans in Robinson, kicker Dan Bailey and defensive tackle Tom Johnson. Two of those moves, Robinson and Bailey, were aimed at directly helping areas in which the Vikings struggled in Green Bay.
“I texted [the front office] the other night and told all those guys thank you for trying to get some more players in here,” coach Mike Zimmer said. “We felt like we needed to make some moves after that game.”
After missing three kicks in Green Bay, rookie Daniel Carlson showed up to work Monday for a normal workout and special teams meeting. He was instead told he was being waived after two NFL games. Spielman’s Monday then turned to hosting Bailey for a physical and reacquiring Johnson, whose weekend release from the Seahawks didn’t become official until that day.
Suddenly a Vikings roster that began the season as the NFC’s youngest needed three veteran reinforcements in the 34-year-old Johnson, 30-year-old Bailey and 29-year-old Robinson.
Only one of the additions is set up to be a seamless transition.
Johnson, who turned from a career journeyman to key contributor in Minnesota from 2014-2017, was greeted by familiar faces. But he still required a 90-minute tour Tuesday with Spielman around the Vikings’ spacious new Eagan practice facilities.
Change continued to hit Johnson as he went into the locker room. Friend Terence Newman is now an assistant coach. Former locker mate Brian Robison was cut Sept. 1 after 11 seasons in Minnesota.

“To not see them, yeah, it’s different,” Johnson said. “B-Rob is a big part of this locker room, always has been since I’ve been here and before I got here. So, without him around, it feels a little different.”
A whirlwind landed Johnson back in Minnesota after just one game for the Seahawks, who told him they wanted to bring him back on a cheaper deal this week. Then the Vikings swooped in to re-sign their former starter.
“This is where pretty much my career started growing up,” Johnson said. “So I think it’s a good fit, and it’s only going to get better.”
His addition is just one of the early-season tweaks to the Vikings lineup.
This wild week ends with the woeful Buffalo Bills (0-2) coming to U.S. Bank Stadium on Sunday. The Vikings (1-0-1) have a chance to recalibrate their emotions against an underwhelming opponent.

http://www.startribune.com/vikings-began...493780971/

Reply

#2
Not the same without Robison. 
Reply

#3
Quote: @Vanguard83 said:
Not the same without Robison. 
Not even close. The article talks about being one of the youngest rosters and needing veteran reinforcements. Uh we had that. Just sayin. I miss BRob.
Reply

#4
Quote: @Vanguard83 said:
Not the same without Robison. 

Yep. What we all were thinking gets said by a team mate.
Maybe I'm just too jaded after being a Vikings fan for my entire life, and maybe I just worry needlessly. It's ingrained in you as a fan of this team. I don't really know how to explain. All of the change, while mostly very exciting, also feels like it could blow up in our faces. There's no doubt that all of Rick and Zim's chips are pushed in the middle. The pressure is intense. We now have a "dream team." Dream teams haven't always worked out, though.
Our defense hasn't exactly broken but it has definitely bent. Despite the "stacked" roster there seems to be something a bit off. I have wondered if one of those things is Robison's absence. I've also had a slight nagging feeling in the back of my head that the league has figured out Zim and his defenses. I don't know...just a fleeting notion that's crossed my mind.


Reply

#5
Quote: @Vanguard83 said:
Not the same without Robison. 

Amen!!!  Dude was the veteran leadership. 
Reply

#6
I'm not buying this was a conscientious decision made to age the roster, but rather improving where they had to and could. 

This was a about a young kicker that sucked, a chance to get Johnson back as 3t depth over Parry and a kid who could stretch the field and had history with The Capt'n vs Coley. 


Reply

#7
Quote: @prairieghost said:
@Vanguard83 said:
Not the same without Robison. 

Yep. What we all were thinking gets said by a team mate.
Maybe I'm just too jaded after being a Vikings fan for my entire life, and maybe I just worry needlessly. It's ingrained in you as a fan of this team. I don't really know how to explain. All of the change, while mostly very exciting, also feels like it could blow up in our faces. There's no doubt that all of Rick and Zim's chips are pushed in the middle. The pressure is intense. We now have a "dream team." Dream teams haven't always worked out, though.
Our defense hasn't exactly broken but it has definitely bent. Despite the "stacked" roster there seems to be something a bit off. I have wondered if one of those things is Robison's absence. I've also had a slight nagging feeling in the back of my head that the league has figured out Zim and his defenses. I don't know...just a fleeting notion that's crossed my mind.


I fear that the "business decision" may have erased some of what made our lockerroom great.  So many players said there was something different, something special about the Vikings locker room last year.  Now, I don't know. 

I sure hope not.  But that is a concern of mine as well.
Reply

#8
The sentimentality of fans know no bounds. Brian Robison not being on this team doesn't have anything to do with anything other than losing what would have been a decent rotational DE. He was very much a leader of the football team, without a doubt. But the team was a missed FG away from being 2-0, not sure where this low level doom and gloom in this thread is coming from other than typical Viking's fan angst. We can be a group of sad sacks that micro-manage everything the team does. Too close to the forest to see the trees sometimes, myself included. The Vikings were on a magic carpet ride with Keenum, that can't be duplicated. Its a new year.

These latest moves where designed to rectify problems that could have continued to hurt the team going forward. Not sure why this should be anything other than applauded rather than some hand-wringing. Regardless of what the results are, the process was correct.

Read this for a different perspective: 

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000...owl-puzzle
Reply

#9
Quote: @StickyBun said:
The sentimentality of fans know no bounds. Brian Robison not being on this team doesn't have anything to do with anything other than losing what would have been a decent rotational DE. He was very much a leader of the football team, without a doubt. But the team was a missed FG away from being 2-0, not sure where this low level doom and gloom in this thread is coming from other than typical Viking's fan angst. We can be a group of sad sacks that micro-manage everything the team does. Too close to the forest to see the trees sometimes, myself included. The Vikings were on a magic carpet ride with Keenum, that can't be duplicated. Its a new year.

These latest moves where designed to rectify problems that could have continued to hurt the team going forward. Not sure why this should be anything other than applauded rather than some hand-wringing. Regardless of what the results are, the process was correct.

Read this for a different perspective: 

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000...owl-puzzle
lol, no one said not having BRob was the reason we lost.  You might want to re-read the posts to get the feel for what other fans actually think about the issue.
Reply

#10
These roster moves were made to: 1) improve the run D with T. Johnson, 2) A legit deep threat a WR, and 3) a reliable K. It had nothing to do with aging the team.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 Melroy van den Berg.