Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Vikings’ Mike Zimmer: NFL’s stricter helmet rule could ‘cost people jobs’
#1
The NFL’s new helmet rule already has created plenty of controversy. Vikings coach Mike Zimmer added to it Monday. 
Zimmer said if a suspect call is made this season and it costs a team a game, it could result in severe consequences. 
“It’s going to cost some people some jobs,” Zimmer said. “Playoffs, jobs, the whole bit, I’m guessing.” 
The NFL has instituted rule changes and new interpretations of rules in an effort to improve safety. The most controversial change has been a rule penalizing players for lowering their head and leading with their helmets. 
The Vikings have not had such a penalty called on them in two preseason games. The Jacksonville Jaguars were assessed two in their 14-10 exhibition victory over Minnesota on Saturday at the U.S. Bank Stadium. 
The first came when Jaguars linebacker A.J. Bouye was flagged for a hit on Vikings fullback C.J. Ham. Even though the penalty wasn’t called against his team, Zimmer took exception to it. 
“(Bouye) is tackling him around his legs and he had his head to the side for the most part,” Zimmer said. “I actually sent that (to the NFL office) to ask them, ‘Why was this called?’ Then you see other plays, because I go through the tape with the other coaches. I said, ‘I wonder if this is a penalty.’ … It’s just hard to figure out.” 
Zimmer was asked if perhaps officials are calling the rule more closely in the preseason than they will in the regular season. 
“No one has ever said to me, ‘Hey, don’t worry, we’re going to call less,’ or ‘We’re going to straighten this out in the regular season’ or ‘We’re going to come up with a revised rule,’ ” Zimmer said. “Sometimes, with the illegal contact (rule) a few years ago, in the preseason there were hundreds of flags and then they backed off of it a little bit. I don’t know if that’s what they’ll do.” 
Vikings safety Harrison Smith and nose tackle Linval Joseph both agreed with Zimmer that a suspect call could change the outcome of a game. 
“Without a doubt, that is going to happen,” Smith said. “If you get a big sack, that changes field position, that changes maybe getting a guy out of field-goal range, get them on third and long or something like that, or get off the field at third down. (A penalty could result in) a whole new set of downs.” 
Joseph said “any team can lose a game” with a “sack that is miscalled.” Nevertheless, Joseph said he can’t be any less aggressive because of the helmet rule. 
“If you try to adjust too much or overthink the new rules, you’ll give up a lot of big plays, too, and you’ll get exposed another way,” he said. “I’m just going to keep doing my job, and hopefully everything will be fixed by the time the (regular) season starts.” 
Zimmer said one Vikings player slowed up on a play Saturday because he perhaps was “afraid to get a penalty.” Vikings defensive end Brian Robison called the helmet rule “confusing” and said there could be a risk of a player being injured if he slows up. 
https://www.twincities.com/2018/08/20/vi...ople-jobs/
Reply

#2
Preseason flags have Vikings on uneasy ground with rules

With Hard Knocks in Cleveland, rookie quarterbacks battling for jobs across the league and numerous teams dealing with Super Bowl expectations, you would think storylines would be pouring out of the NFL left and right. Instead water-cooler football conversations have been drown out by talk about the NFL rule book.

When Minnesota Vikings linebacker Antwione Williams was flagged for roughing quarterback Cody Kessler late in the fourth quarter of Saturday’s game, the internet exploded with bewildered fans, players and analysts.

And that might not have even been the strangest flag of the day. The Vikings were more bamboozled by a penalty called on their opponent.
“The one that they [Jacksonville] had called on them, and [CJ] Ham, the guy is tackling him around his legs and he had his head to the side for the most part. I actually sent that in, to ask them, ‘Why was this called?’” head coach Mike Zimmer said.
The NFL announced before the preseason they were going to focus on players’ use of their helmet while tackling. This came from NFL Operations:
[Image: Screen-Shot-2018-08-20-at-4.30.21-PM.png]
During Monday’s press conference, the Vikings’ head coach brought up examples of areas of potential confusion about the helmet rules.
“We had a cut block the other day and the guy goes and cuts, is that a penalty?” Zimmer said. “There’s a lot of things, a lineman runs out on a screen, I brought this up when they were talking about this whole thing. A lineman runs out on a screen and he goes and cuts the linebacker or the safety, is that a penalty? Because I don’t know how you can dive like that.”
The fear from coaches and players alike is that questionable 15-yard penalties are going to alter the results of games and that they won’t know how to avoid said penalties.
http://www.1500espn.com/vikings-2/2018/0...und-rules/
Reply

#3
Goodbye, Andrew...
Reply

#4
Just go ahead & lower your shoulder, I’ll be damned if your head doesn’t come w/ it every time, hmm... what a clusterf**k of a rule!  Confused
Reply

#5
Quote: @"BarrNone55" said:
Goodbye, Andrew...
Maybe signing Iloka is insurance for when Sendejo inevitably gets ejected? Both players are physical and could have issues with this rule, though I've felt that Sendejo has been reckless at times.
Reply

#6
I think the league is going to have to make changes before the season starts. The uproar against this rule will grow as the pre-season rolls along. 
Reply

#7
Quote: @purplefaithful said:
I think the league is going to have to make changes before the season starts. The uproar against this rule will grow as the pre-season rolls along. 
I dont think they will,  if they were contemplating a change they wouldnt have released the statement yesterday saying no change.  I think they intend to roll with this bull shit until they really start seeing it hit them in the wallet.... I think a fan revolt against concessions would maybe send a message.  if everybody agreed to stop using the concessions at the stadiums it would hit the wallet.  most already have their sunk costs in the game tickets by now, but you can still control how much you spend at the games without not being there to support the players.
Reply

#8
Quote: @JimmyinSD said:
@purplefaithful said:
I think the league is going to have to make changes before the season starts. The uproar against this rule will grow as the pre-season rolls along. 
I dont think they will,  if they were contemplating a change they wouldnt have released the statement yesterday saying no change.  I think they intend to roll with this bull shit until they really start seeing it hit them in the wallet.... I think a fan revolt against concessions would maybe send a message.  if everybody agreed to stop using the concessions at the stadiums it would hit the wallet.  most already have their sunk costs in the game tickets by now, but you can still control how much you spend at the games without not being there to support the players.
I didnt see that statement, before my post. Sounds like they may be digging their heels in? The concessions will never happen, it will have to be player and fan court of opinion or declining ratings which would take years to manifest. 

League is scared to death of CTE, long-term player impairments  == lifetime health care and its cost for players. That will really hit them in the wallets. 

Hopefully rules will evolve, but like much in life it's a give and take. 
Reply

#9
Quote: @purplefaithful said:
@JimmyinSD said:
@purplefaithful said:
I think the league is going to have to make changes before the season starts. The uproar against this rule will grow as the pre-season rolls along. 
I dont think they will,  if they were contemplating a change they wouldnt have released the statement yesterday saying no change.  I think they intend to roll with this bull shit until they really start seeing it hit them in the wallet.... I think a fan revolt against concessions would maybe send a message.  if everybody agreed to stop using the concessions at the stadiums it would hit the wallet.  most already have their sunk costs in the game tickets by now, but you can still control how much you spend at the games without not being there to support the players.
I didnt see that statement, before my post. Sounds like they may be digging their heels in? The concessions will never happen, it will have to be player and fan court of opinion or declining ratings which would take years to manifest. 

League is scared to death of CTE, long-term player impairments  == lifetime health care and its cost for players. That will really hit them in the wallets. 

Hopefully rules will evolve, but like much in life it's a give and take. 
they need to come up with a  disclaimer and a waiver that players have to sign to play... it amazes me that this isnt already in place for a sport as violent as football.  (or honestly that it needs to be,  anybody that played football for more than 5 minutes knows that it cant be good for your head.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
3 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 Melroy van den Berg.