Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
SJWs approach the endgame
#1
https://www.dailywire.com/news/35252/sjw...ashe-schow

Set aside the stupidity of being upset that someone is ACTING as someone they are not when the job calls for ACTING as someone they are not.

But this exposed the root stupidity of it all.  Since the heritage they were faking outrage in defense of wasn't actually the correct heritage, they just ASSUMED it.

Quote:This is one of the biggest problems with social justice — those who
decide they get to choose what is and isn’t okay are basing their
decisions solely on looks. Judging people based on their looks and then
telling them what they can or cannot do based on those perceived looks
is, oh, what’s the word?


Reply

#2
Quote: @greediron said:
https://www.dailywire.com/news/35252/sjw...ashe-schow

Set aside the stupidity of being upset that someone is ACTING as someone they are not when the job calls for ACTING as someone they are not.

But this exposed the root stupidity of it all.  Since the heritage they were faking outrage in defense of wasn't actually the correct heritage, they just ASSUMED it.

This is one of the biggest problems with social justice — those who
decide they get to choose what is and isn’t okay are basing their
decisions solely on looks. Judging people based on their looks and then
telling them what they can or cannot do based on those perceived looks
is, oh, what’s the word?
Who's "they" in this? 
Reply

#3
Quote: @MaroonBells said:
@greediron said:
https://www.dailywire.com/news/35252/sjw...ashe-schow

Set aside the stupidity of being upset that someone is ACTING as someone they are not when the job calls for ACTING as someone they are not.

But this exposed the root stupidity of it all.  Since the heritage they were faking outrage in defense of wasn't actually the correct heritage, they just ASSUMED it.

This is one of the biggest problems with social justice — those who
decide they get to choose what is and isn’t okay are basing their
decisions solely on looks. Judging people based on their looks and then
telling them what they can or cannot do based on those perceived looks
is, oh, what’s the word?
Who's "they" in this? 
the SJWs mentioned in the headline.
Reply

#4
"They" seems to be, "those who decide...what is and isn't okay... base[d]... solely on looks."
Reply

#5
Quote: @greediron said:
@MaroonBells said:
@greediron said:
https://www.dailywire.com/news/35252/sjw...ashe-schow

Set aside the stupidity of being upset that someone is ACTING as someone they are not when the job calls for ACTING as someone they are not.

But this exposed the root stupidity of it all.  Since the heritage they were faking outrage in defense of wasn't actually the correct heritage, they just ASSUMED it.

This is one of the biggest problems with social justice — those who
decide they get to choose what is and isn’t okay are basing their
decisions solely on looks. Judging people based on their looks and then
telling them what they can or cannot do based on those perceived looks
is, oh, what’s the word?
Who's "they" in this? 
the SJWs mentioned in the headline.
What did they say? 
Reply

#6
Quote: @MaroonBells said:
@greediron said:
@MaroonBells said:
@greediron said:
https://www.dailywire.com/news/35252/sjw...ashe-schow

Set aside the stupidity of being upset that someone is ACTING as someone they are not when the job calls for ACTING as someone they are not.

But this exposed the root stupidity of it all.  Since the heritage they were faking outrage in defense of wasn't actually the correct heritage, they just ASSUMED it.

This is one of the biggest problems with social justice — those who
decide they get to choose what is and isn’t okay are basing their
decisions solely on looks. Judging people based on their looks and then
telling them what they can or cannot do based on those perceived looks
is, oh, what’s the word?
Who's "they" in this? 
the SJWs mentioned in the headline.
What did they say? 
RTFA

Reply

#7
Quote: @greediron said:
@MaroonBells said:
@greediron said:
@MaroonBells said:
@greediron said:
https://www.dailywire.com/news/35252/sjw...ashe-schow

Set aside the stupidity of being upset that someone is ACTING as someone they are not when the job calls for ACTING as someone they are not.

But this exposed the root stupidity of it all.  Since the heritage they were faking outrage in defense of wasn't actually the correct heritage, they just ASSUMED it.

This is one of the biggest problems with social justice — those who
decide they get to choose what is and isn’t okay are basing their
decisions solely on looks. Judging people based on their looks and then
telling them what they can or cannot do based on those perceived looks
is, oh, what’s the word?
Who's "they" in this? 
the SJWs mentioned in the headline.
What did they say? 
RTFA

I did. Followed every link. It doesn't say. Mostly, I just wanted you to be aware that the site you linked to is a right wing propaganda site whose only purpose is to serve up red meat to its hungry base. You actually read that garbage? 
Reply

#8
Quote: @MaroonBells said:
@greediron said:
@MaroonBells said:
@greediron said:
@MaroonBells said:
@greediron said:
https://www.dailywire.com/news/35252/sjw...ashe-schow

Set aside the stupidity of being upset that someone is ACTING as someone they are not when the job calls for ACTING as someone they are not.

But this exposed the root stupidity of it all.  Since the heritage they were faking outrage in defense of wasn't actually the correct heritage, they just ASSUMED it.

This is one of the biggest problems with social justice — those who
decide they get to choose what is and isn’t okay are basing their
decisions solely on looks. Judging people based on their looks and then
telling them what they can or cannot do based on those perceived looks
is, oh, what’s the word?
Who's "they" in this? 
the SJWs mentioned in the headline.
What did they say? 
RTFA

I did. Followed every link. It doesn't say. Mostly, I just wanted you to be aware that the site you linked to is a right wing propaganda site whose only purpose is to serve up red meat to its hungry base. You actually read that garbage? 
Finally, you offer something other than snark.  But are still being obstinate.  SJWs on twitter or wherever.  And pretty much everything to the right of the WaPo is right wing propoganda in your eyes. 

Yes I read it.  It is hilarious.  SJWs reaching the end game and exposing the flawed thinking of the left. 
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 Melroy van den Berg.