Quote: @Zanary said:
@ Bullazin said:
wow i had really missed these circle jerks, so nice of savannah to troll by, and look who takes it and runs smh
Wow...first post on the thread, and its was pure liquid s**t...followed by accusations of others' self-righteousness?
Bullazin...you are absolutely nailing the "clueless poster of the day" award, running away. No one forced you to join the discussion, or to be a turd when you did.
Zan you must not be reading what i said, regardless carry on. it could be that my settings are effed up i guess
Quote: @Bullazin said:
@ greediron said:
@ Bullazin said:
@ pumpf said:
@ Bullazin said:
this was on the main board when i logged in. if something changed in my settings i will have to look at that. savannah used to be reasonable but became a troll after the last election. something flipped his switch i guess. pumpf check your log bud, not my speck. and just so you are clear, ive never had my ass handed to me in anything. i dont believe that would be challenged by you on any subject, unless self righteousness becomes a popular activity
Listen here, Bull- YOU were the one to throw the first stone here. Whatever you might want to attribute to Savannah, he didn't do anything "troll-ish" in THIS thread. You, on the other hand...
Did you have a problem when someone posted that Harry Anderson died? I don't remember you posting anything about that. Hmmm... No?
So what are we left to think, other than Savannah is living rent-free in your kitchen?
As for the self-righteousness... let me know when I attack someone for no reason... and then try to justify it because "they used to be reasonable". Shoot, I didn't even attack you. I told you to blow it out your ear... and I surmised what it might be that caused you to become Savannah-phobic. But I didn't call you any names or attack you personally... did I? So, about that "self-righteousness" thing...
EDIT: I did question your priorities; so there is that. But, again: you have no problem with someone speaking such hateful rhetoric about the former first lady? It is possible to disagree with what she said... without compromising your other principles. I told you that I agreed with you... even as I was telling you to blow it out your ear. So- in my opinion- it IS possible. Yet you clicked on this thread... said nothing about the actual topic at hand... and just attacked Savannah. So, again: who has the "self-righteousness" problem?
it was on the main board. IDC but if anyone noticed i dont post in sensitive topics. Hardly ever been here. This thread showed up in my main feed, never had that happen beforebut you would never stop to think about these points wouldya? And he did change didnt he? I never crossed swords with him on the old boards that i recalll. so now he just shows up to post inciteful shit on the main board, which gets moved to the sensitive(read: circle jerk) board. Sounds like the definition of trolling to me. Rent free in my kitchen ? lol is that what the cool kids (read: cynical, self righteous know-it-alls ) say now?
edited April 18 in Sensitive Topics
Yes it is in sensitive topics. So please stop being all sensitive about it. Either walk away or behave
I didnt break any rules dummy, so you walk away. can you please ban me from ST i mean the circle jerk board, whatever you want to call it. No bullshit i dont want it showing up in my feed
Since you can't figure it out, yes we will gladly remove you.
Quote: @Bullazin said:
@ pumpf said:
@ Bullazin said:
this was on the main board when i logged in. if something changed in my settings i will have to look at that. savannah used to be reasonable but became a troll after the last election. something flipped his switch i guess. pumpf check your log bud, not my speck. and just so you are clear, ive never had my ass handed to me in anything. i dont believe that would be challenged by you on any subject, unless self righteousness becomes a popular activity
Listen here, Bull- YOU were the one to throw the first stone here. Whatever you might want to attribute to Savannah, he didn't do anything "troll-ish" in THIS thread. You, on the other hand...
Did you have a problem when someone posted that Harry Anderson died? I don't remember you posting anything about that. Hmmm... No?
So what are we left to think, other than Savannah is living rent-free in your kitchen?
As for the self-righteousness... let me know when I attack someone for no reason... and then try to justify it because "they used to be reasonable". Shoot, I didn't even attack you. I told you to blow it out your ear... and I surmised what it might be that caused you to become Savannah-phobic. But I didn't call you any names or attack you personally... did I? So, about that "self-righteousness" thing...
EDIT: I did question your priorities; so there is that. But, again: you have no problem with someone speaking such hateful rhetoric about the former first lady? It is possible to disagree with what she said... without compromising your other principles. I told you that I agreed with you... even as I was telling you to blow it out your ear. So- in my opinion- it IS possible. Yet you clicked on this thread... said nothing about the actual topic at hand... and just attacked Savannah. So, again: who has the "self-righteousness" problem?
it was on the main board. IDC but if anyone noticed i dont post in sensitive topics. Hardly ever been here. This thread showed up in my main feed, never had that happen beforebut you would never stop to think about these points wouldya? And he did change didnt he? I never crossed swords with him on the old boards that i recalll. so now he just shows up to post inciteful shit on the main board, which gets moved to the sensitive(read: circle jerk) board. Sounds like the definition of trolling to me. Rent free in my kitchen ? lol is that what the cool kids (read: cynical, self righteous know-it-alls ) say now?
You keep using the term "self-righteous", but I'm not sure we agree on the definition. I think it is someone who thinks that they never do anything wrong; someone who thinks they are the greatest and makes it clear by looking down on everyone else. You seem to think it means someone who disagrees with you, because I've never claimed to be good... and certainly not better than anyone else here (y'know, except for that one guy). On the other hand, there are "hypocrites"; they are those who accuse others of doing something "bad"... which, it turns out, is the very thing they (themselves) were doing.
I do not dispute the possibility that Savannah may have- in other threads- posted provocative things. But he didn't do it THIS TIME. That's why I'm defending him. And, frankly, if the tables were reversed... and, say, Hillary Clinton had died... and Caactorvike had posted her obituary here... and Savannah had attacked him for "trolling"... guess what? I would've said the same thing to him (Savannah). I might not have told him to blow it out his ear; it depends on the attitude he showed to Caactor, first.
As for the sensitive topics vs. main board "stuff"... I don't know anything about it. But the headline... and the "author" of the post... should've given you a pretty good clue as to what it was about. Yes, other non-liberals chimed in to steer things away from the OP. So you're ire should've been directed at them. That's why it seems (to me) that you just have an issue with Savannah (and why I defended him).
Bullazin is no longer able to view ST as per his request.
Quote: @greediron said:
Bullazin is no longer able to view ST as per his request.
Probably for the best.
imgot tripped up by this recently too. if you dont opr out of the sensitive topics board, they will come in as part of “recent discussions” or something. i was upset but when i realized why i got that post on my feed i apologized to Savannah—he has every right to post what he wants on the sensitive topics board.
i would like to say though i dont appreciate a mod referring to someone as “dummy”. If you cant be civil—rant on the sensitive boards yourself.
No mods have called anyone dummy. Bullazin called me a dummy and I was mightily offended, but managed to work out my issues on my own. (and a random cat).
Full disclosure: I did post something late the other night, that one might describe as provocative. (note, my original post was edited)
BUT, then upon soon after hearing the news of Babs Bush... and actually being moved by the positive BI-PARTISAN comments (in other venues) ... I came back and edited to this topic, for the sake of unity/bigger picture. Deaths, will do that (give perspective)
(I doubt but a few saw my original OP, and no one had yet commented... or I'd have left it)
**sigh**
This is what I don't like about "sensitive subjects" unless you do a,b,c to not get them.
But that's my problem, not yours.
I promised awhile back, to begone. Let me re-promise... and hope I have more discipline, this time. 
Starting........now!
https://makeagif.com/gif/kramer-starting-now-1Ih03G
Quote: @savannahskol said:
Full disclosure: I did post something late the other night, that one might describe as provocative. (note, my original post was edited)
BUT, then upon soon after hearing the news of Babs Bush... and actually being moved by the positive BI-PARTISAN comments (in other venues) ... I came back and edited to this topic, for the sake of unity/bigger picture. Deaths, will do that (give perspective)
(I doubt but a few saw my original OP, and no one had yet commented... or I'd have left it)
**sigh**
This is what I don't like about "sensitive subjects" unless you do a,b,c to not get them.
But that's my problem, not yours.
I promised awhile back, to begone. Let me re-promise... and hope I have more discipline, this time.
Starting........now!
https://makeagif.com/gif/kramer-starting-now-1Ih03G
not true, most people have to ask to be in here. When Mike set it up he grandfathered some in that he thought would for sure want access, but most posters have opted into being able to see this board.
and the raging bitch strikes again. at what point does her conduct become detrimental to the school and she is suspended or terminated. her tenure protects her to some degree but I think this dumb bitch thinks she is invincible.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/bush-h...li=BBnb7Kz
|
