Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Barbara Bush
#11
Quote: @JimmyinSD said:
@Zanary said:
@JimmyinSD said:
@Zanary said:
@JimmyinSD said:
@Zanary said:
I hope her students get discounts/refunds for being taught by a babbling hate monger.
its a california college... they likely pay more for that kind of talk.
I dunno, the school's response was quick to cite her as being against their "core values"...so that's something....
they cant fire her,   but they can take disciplinary action if her twitter is also used or promoted while performing her college duties,  which it likely is.  I saw their response,  but I dont know if I think its genuine or just PC lip service.
I think it looked like a "cut out your bulls**t" warning, because while the horrid woman in question may have tenure and a certain amount of armor in being minority/female/visible...the negative responses have been MASSIVE, and I imagine the school's phone and website/email are being showered with unhappy responses.
arent california colleges kind of used to dumb ass professors making statements that arent popular and typically enrage the rest of the country?
Sorta...but some professors actually get disciplined, some get shamed into resigning (always complaining about the hatred of others, natch), and most tend to quiet down after drawing too much ire toward their learning institution.

As much as it seems like there's another one of these idiots every day, you don't see many repeat their bluster.
Reply

#12
wow i had really missed these circle jerks, so nice of savannah to troll by, and look who takes it and runs smh
Reply

#13
Quote: @Bullazin said:
wow i had really missed these circle jerks, so nice of savannah to troll by, and look who takes it and runs smh
Blow it out your ear, Bull!  Savannah wasn't the one who trolled.  He simply posted news.  From Time magazine (not Alex Jones, Fox, etc).
Yes, the conversation did turn away from the OP... so why don't you blame the one who did that (if you actually have a problem with it)?  Otherwise you're just coming off as someone who got their ass handed to them by a rational, logical rhetorician... is still bitter about it... and is lugging around a grudge.
For the record, I don't like the behavior you described, either.  But if you're gonna attack it, at least be honest about it.
Oh, one other thing.  I see that you have no problem attacking Savannah... but you were silent about the slug who spoke such hateful things about the former first lady.  Nice priorities you got there.
Reply

#14
Quote: @Bullazin said:
wow i had really missed these circle jerks, so nice of savannah to troll by, and look who takes it and runs smh
You are free to ignore it if bothers you so.  Not sure why you would call out Savannah for his contibution.
Reply

#15
this was on the main board when i logged in.  if something changed in my settings i will have to look at that.  savannah used to be reasonable but became a troll after the last election. something flipped his switch i guess.  pumpf check your log bud, not my speck.  and just so you are clear, ive never had my ass handed to me in anything. i dont believe that would be challenged by you on any subject, unless self righteousness becomes a popular activity
Reply

#16
Quote: @Bullazin said:
this was on the main board when i logged in.  if something changed in my settings i will have to look at that.  savannah used to be reasonable but became a troll after the last election. something flipped his switch i guess.  pumpf check your log bud, not my speck.  and just so you are clear, ive never had my ass handed to me in anything. i dont believe that would be challenged by you on any subject, unless self righteousness becomes a popular activity
Listen here, Bull- YOU were the one to throw the first stone here.  Whatever you might want to attribute to Savannah, he didn't do anything "troll-ish" in THIS thread.  You, on the other hand...

Did you have a problem when someone posted that Harry Anderson died?  I don't remember you posting anything about that.  Hmmm... No?  

So what are we left to think, other than Savannah is living rent-free in your kitchen?  

As for the self-righteousness... let me know when I attack someone for no reason... and then try to justify it because "they used to be reasonable".  Shoot, I didn't even attack you.  I told you to blow it out your ear... and I surmised what it might be that caused you to become Savannah-phobic.  But I didn't call you any names or attack you personally... did I?  So, about that "self-righteousness" thing...

EDIT: I did question your priorities; so there is that.  But, again: you have no problem with someone speaking such hateful rhetoric about the former first lady?  It is possible to disagree with what she said... without compromising your other principles.  I told you that I agreed with you... even as I was telling you to blow it out your ear.  So- in my opinion- it IS possible.  Yet you clicked on this thread... said nothing about the actual topic at hand... and just attacked Savannah.  So, again: who has the "self-righteousness" problem?
Reply

#17
Quote: @pumpf said:
@Bullazin said:
this was on the main board when i logged in.  if something changed in my settings i will have to look at that.  savannah used to be reasonable but became a troll after the last election. something flipped his switch i guess.  pumpf check your log bud, not my speck.  and just so you are clear, ive never had my ass handed to me in anything. i dont believe that would be challenged by you on any subject, unless self righteousness becomes a popular activity
Listen here, Bull- YOU were the one to throw the first stone here.  Whatever you might want to attribute to Savannah, he didn't do anything "troll-ish" in THIS thread.  You, on the other hand...

Did you have a problem when someone posted that Harry Anderson died?  I don't remember you posting anything about that.  Hmmm... No?  

So what are we left to think, other than Savannah is living rent-free in your kitchen?  

As for the self-righteousness... let me know when I attack someone for no reason... and then try to justify it because "they used to be reasonable".  Shoot, I didn't even attack you.  I told you to blow it out your ear... and I surmised what it might be that caused you to become Savannah-phobic.  But I didn't call you any names or attack you personally... did I?  So, about that "self-righteousness" thing...

EDIT: I did question your priorities; so there is that.  But, again: you have no problem with someone speaking such hateful rhetoric about the former first lady?  It is possible to disagree with what she said... without compromising your other principles.  I told you that I agreed with you... even as I was telling you to blow it out your ear.  So- in my opinion- it IS possible.  Yet you clicked on this thread... said nothing about the actual topic at hand... and just attacked Savannah.  So, again: who has the "self-righteousness" problem?
it was on the main board.  IDC but if anyone noticed i dont post in sensitive topics.  Hardly ever been here.  This thread showed up in my main feed, never had that happen beforebut you would never stop to think about these points wouldya?  And he did change didnt he?  I never crossed swords with him on the old boards  that i recalll.  so now he just shows up to post inciteful shit on the main board, which gets moved to the sensitive(read: circle jerk) board.  Sounds like the definition of trolling to me.  Rent free in my kitchen ? lol is that what the cool kids (read: cynical, self righteous know-it-alls ) say now?
Reply

#18
Quote: @Bullazin said:
@pumpf said:
@Bullazin said:
this was on the main board when i logged in.  if something changed in my settings i will have to look at that.  savannah used to be reasonable but became a troll after the last election. something flipped his switch i guess.  pumpf check your log bud, not my speck.  and just so you are clear, ive never had my ass handed to me in anything. i dont believe that would be challenged by you on any subject, unless self righteousness becomes a popular activity
Listen here, Bull- YOU were the one to throw the first stone here.  Whatever you might want to attribute to Savannah, he didn't do anything "troll-ish" in THIS thread.  You, on the other hand...

Did you have a problem when someone posted that Harry Anderson died?  I don't remember you posting anything about that.  Hmmm... No?  

So what are we left to think, other than Savannah is living rent-free in your kitchen?  

As for the self-righteousness... let me know when I attack someone for no reason... and then try to justify it because "they used to be reasonable".  Shoot, I didn't even attack you.  I told you to blow it out your ear... and I surmised what it might be that caused you to become Savannah-phobic.  But I didn't call you any names or attack you personally... did I?  So, about that "self-righteousness" thing...

EDIT: I did question your priorities; so there is that.  But, again: you have no problem with someone speaking such hateful rhetoric about the former first lady?  It is possible to disagree with what she said... without compromising your other principles.  I told you that I agreed with you... even as I was telling you to blow it out your ear.  So- in my opinion- it IS possible.  Yet you clicked on this thread... said nothing about the actual topic at hand... and just attacked Savannah.  So, again: who has the "self-righteousness" problem?
it was on the main board.  IDC but if anyone noticed i dont post in sensitive topics.  Hardly ever been here.  This thread showed up in my main feed, never had that happen beforebut you would never stop to think about these points wouldya?  And he did change didnt he?  I never crossed swords with him on the old boards  that i recalll.  so now he just shows up to post inciteful shit on the main board, which gets moved to the sensitive(read: circle jerk) board.  Sounds like the definition of trolling to me.  Rent free in my kitchen ? lol is that what the cool kids (read: cynical, self righteous know-it-alls ) say now?
edited April 18 in Sensitive Topics

Yes it is in sensitive topics.  So please stop being all sensitive about it.  Either walk away or behave.
Reply

#19
Quote: @Bullazin said:
wow i had really missed these circle jerks, so nice of savannah to troll by, and look who takes it and runs smh
Wow...first post on the thread, and its was pure liquid s**t...followed by accusations of others' self-righteousness?

Bullazin...you are absolutely nailing the "clueless poster of the day" award, running away.  No one forced you to join the discussion, or to be a turd when you did.
Reply

#20
Quote: @greediron said:
@Bullazin said:
@pumpf said:
@Bullazin said:
this was on the main board when i logged in.  if something changed in my settings i will have to look at that.  savannah used to be reasonable but became a troll after the last election. something flipped his switch i guess.  pumpf check your log bud, not my speck.  and just so you are clear, ive never had my ass handed to me in anything. i dont believe that would be challenged by you on any subject, unless self righteousness becomes a popular activity
Listen here, Bull- YOU were the one to throw the first stone here.  Whatever you might want to attribute to Savannah, he didn't do anything "troll-ish" in THIS thread.  You, on the other hand...

Did you have a problem when someone posted that Harry Anderson died?  I don't remember you posting anything about that.  Hmmm... No?  

So what are we left to think, other than Savannah is living rent-free in your kitchen?  

As for the self-righteousness... let me know when I attack someone for no reason... and then try to justify it because "they used to be reasonable".  Shoot, I didn't even attack you.  I told you to blow it out your ear... and I surmised what it might be that caused you to become Savannah-phobic.  But I didn't call you any names or attack you personally... did I?  So, about that "self-righteousness" thing...

EDIT: I did question your priorities; so there is that.  But, again: you have no problem with someone speaking such hateful rhetoric about the former first lady?  It is possible to disagree with what she said... without compromising your other principles.  I told you that I agreed with you... even as I was telling you to blow it out your ear.  So- in my opinion- it IS possible.  Yet you clicked on this thread... said nothing about the actual topic at hand... and just attacked Savannah.  So, again: who has the "self-righteousness" problem?
it was on the main board.  IDC but if anyone noticed i dont post in sensitive topics.  Hardly ever been here.  This thread showed up in my main feed, never had that happen beforebut you would never stop to think about these points wouldya?  And he did change didnt he?  I never crossed swords with him on the old boards  that i recalll.  so now he just shows up to post inciteful shit on the main board, which gets moved to the sensitive(read: circle jerk) board.  Sounds like the definition of trolling to me.  Rent free in my kitchen ? lol is that what the cool kids (read: cynical, self righteous know-it-alls ) say now?
edited April 18 in Sensitive Topics

Yes it is in sensitive topics.  So please stop being all sensitive about it.  Either walk away or behave

I didnt break any rules dummy, so you walk away.  can you please ban me from ST i mean the circle jerk board, whatever you want to call it.  No bullshit i dont want it showing up in my feed
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 Melroy van den Berg.