Posts: 93
Threads: 93
Joined: May 2013
Reputation:
0
I'm sorry but both those reviewed catches r usually over turned especially the first one he never had control till his foot touched the line all year we have seen the same catch be called incomplete the Ilan catch against Carolina for one .2nd catch could gone either way but if it was the Vikings it would been ruled incomplete. The hit on cooks with a for arm to the helmet were is the flag. Then there is the Atlanta game at the end Jones should caught the ball but he was nicked to the ground before he got up to miss that ball 8 or so yards deep off the line if scrimmage clearly illegal contact before the ball was thrown .eagles should been out then before they even killed the Vikings .so why was a shot hole of a town awarded a superbowl win . He'll I don't even like the Patriots even a inch but they were hosed by the NFL just like every other team .I'm so over the nfl
Dunno, I agreed with both calls.
Back of the endzone TD, he bobbled, but actually got the second foot in. Side of the foot brought up the black pellets in the grass before the toe touched the white.
Ertz's TD was an easy call IMO, he was running, took about 3 steps and lunged over a would be tackler. He made the catch and was running before the contact with the defender.
And the hit on Cook, while nasty was his own fault. He was a runner, and turned back into a defender pursuing him.
Thought it was a pretty well officiated game. Not sure how a team (the pats) only have 1 penalty all game, and there were a few missed PIs. I thought Jefferys was interfered with on the INT? Maybe a different throw, but one he had his arm held down. Gronk pushed on on one of his big catches as well. But they were letting the game play and I like that.
Hi foot still touched the white line that means he is out the whole foot has to be in not just a part of his foot I do beleive
Quote: @Viking1987 said:
Hi foot still touched the white line that means he is out the whole foot has to be in not just a part of his foot I do beleive
doubt it. Think of CC and his toe drags on the sideline. It is just normally the toe that contacts first, but the black pellets flying showed it wasn't in this case. And with it being called a TD on the field, that was enough to keep the call.
Quote: @greediron said:
@ Viking1987 said:
Hi foot still touched the white line that means he is out the whole foot has to be in not just a part of his foot I do beleive
doubt it. Think of CC and his toe drags on the sideline. It is just normally the toe that contacts first, but the black pellets flying showed it wasn't in this case. And with it being called a TD on the field, that was enough to keep the call.
OK but look at it like this if a player is running down the side line and the edge of his foot hits the line he is called out even if the rest of his foot is in the field of play? I just seem to the think if any part off his foot hits the line your out of bounds . I can see your point on the toe taps though
First one was questionable, I thought it could have gone either way. Ertz TD was no brainer...he caught the ball ran for at least 3 steps then dove into end zone, clearly a TD. Call or rather non-call that bothered me the most was Jenkins' head to head with Cooks, I think that should have clearly been a penalty.
Quote: @1VikesFan said:
First one was questionable, I thought it could have gone either way. Ertz TD was no brainer...he caught the ball ran for at least 3 steps then dove into end zone, clearly a TD. Call or rather non-call that bothered me the most was Jenkins' head to head with Cooks, I think that should have clearly been a penalty.
i kind of agree, i dont see why a player on a comeback block has to avoid a hit like that, but defender doesnt have to when a player changes directions like Cooks did. "head on a swivel" or just "watch where you are going" comes to mind. if the league is going to protect guys, then make it consistent.
Quote: @JimmyinSD said:
@ 1VikesFan said:
First one was questionable, I thought it could have gone either way. Ertz TD was no brainer...he caught the ball ran for at least 3 steps then dove into end zone, clearly a TD. Call or rather non-call that bothered me the most was Jenkins' head to head with Cooks, I think that should have clearly been a penalty.
i kind of agree, i dont see why a player on a comeback block has to avoid a hit like that, but defender doesnt have to when a player changes directions like Cooks did. "head on a swivel" or just "watch where you are going" comes to mind. if the league is going to protect guys, then make it consistent.
On a comeback block, the blocker is setting the defender up. On this hit, the defender was pursuing a ball carrier that suddenly changed directions back towards him. Wasn't dirty, wasn't intentional, just a violent collision. Ball carriers need to be aware that turning back towards big men chasing them at full speed can be a bad idea.
Quote: @Viking1987 said:
@ greediron said:
@ Viking1987 said:
Hi foot still touched the white line that means he is out the whole foot has to be in not just a part of his foot I do beleive
doubt it. Think of CC and his toe drags on the sideline. It is just normally the toe that contacts first, but the black pellets flying showed it wasn't in this case. And with it being called a TD on the field, that was enough to keep the call.
OK but look at it like this if a player is running down the side line and the edge of his foot hits the line he is called out even if the rest of his foot is in the field of play? I just seem to the think if any part off his foot hits the line your out of bounds . I can see your point on the toe taps though
it is about what hits first. if the toe drags inbounds first and then out of bounds, what is the call?
Quote: @greediron said:I
@ Viking1987 said:
@ greediron said:
@ Viking1987 said:
Hi foot still touched the white line that means he is out the whole foot has to be in not just a part of his foot I do beleive
doubt it. Think of CC and his toe drags on the sideline. It is just normally the toe that contacts first, but the black pellets flying showed it wasn't in this case. And with it being called a TD on the field, that was enough to keep the call.
OK but look at it like this if a player is running down the side line and the edge of his foot hits the line he is called out even if the rest of his foot is in the field of play? I just seem to the think if any part off his foot hits the line your out of bounds . I can see your point on the toe taps though
it is about what hits first. if the toe drags inbounds first and then out of bounds, what is the call?
That's a very good point let me think on that
|
