Login

comet52 · Yesterday, 01:35 PM

The first part of this is Coller having a discussion with Ben Goessling on the qb situation and trying to dissect comments from the Vikings at the Combine. I thought it was quite interesting.

StickierBuns · Yesterday, 02:03 PM

(Yesterday, 01:35 PM)comet52 Wrote: The first part of this is Coller having a discussion with Ben Goessling on the qb situation and trying to dissect comments from the Vikings at the Combine. I thought it was quite interesting.

I think all the bases are covered now officially online, lol.....gotta love the offseason.

JR44 · Yesterday, 02:43 PM

(Yesterday, 01:35 PM)comet52 Wrote: The first part of this is Coller having a discussion with Ben Goessling on the qb situation and trying to dissect comments from the Vikings at the Combine. I thought it was quite interesting.

I think this is the most accurate take aligns with what we have seen on the field and comments that KOC has made. I think Goessling is going to be privy to information we do not have.

StickierBuns · Yesterday, 02:53 PM

(Yesterday, 02:43 PM)JR44 Wrote: I think this is the most accurate take aligns with what we have seen on the field and comments that KOC has made. I think Goessling is going to be privy to information we do not have.

Ben G. is the least connected guy out there. You may as well believe Kevin Seifert has sources. And Matt Coller is hilariously removed from anything. If you believe anyone, and that's a stretch because I think they almost all make up shit at some point, it would be Tom Pelissero.

FLVike · Yesterday, 07:17 PM

(Yesterday, 12:08 PM)pattersaur Wrote: We haven't won one in 75 years but now it's SB or bust this season? Cmon. I agree it's a big year for KO but I think as long as the train stays somewhat on the tracks, the most likely outcome is he's our coach again in 2027.

We were in the Superbowl 50 years ago, where were you?

Daniel McRandall · Yesterday, 07:45 PM

(Yesterday, 07:17 PM)FLVike Wrote: We were in the Superbowl 50 years ago, where were you?

Yes, we were "IN" the Superbowl for our last time in 1977, but he is correct in that we have not "WON" one. Where he is wrong by saying that it has been 75 years, is that the Vikings have only been around since 1961 so there's that... Somehow, we are always one of the most competitive teams that has never won one. There must be a curse or something over them but at least I don't think they can claim it is the Kardashian Curse like my Phoenix Suns can, (Thanks Booker!) Sad

FLVike · Yesterday, 08:02 PM

(Yesterday, 07:45 PM)Daniel McRandall Wrote: Yes, we were "IN" the Superbowl for our last time in 1977, but he is correct in that we have not "WON" one. Where he is wrong by saying that it has been 75 years, is that the Vikings have only been around since 1961 so there's that... Somehow, we are always one of the most competitive teams that has never won one. There must be a curse or something over them but at least I don't think they can claim it is the Kardashian Curse like my Phoenix Suns can, (Thanks Booker!)

My original post said nothing about winning the Superbowl. When i said Superbowl or bust that meant getting to the Superbowl, just like California or bust means getting to California. My point was that, IMO, if KOC doesn't get to the Superbowl then he will be gone. I NEVER said winning the Superbowl.

StickierBuns · Today, 04:28 AM

For what its worth:

@vikingzfanpage
“Justin Jefferson still believes in JJ McCarthy. I can tell you that factually. He still believes in him.”

@TomPelissero via @RichEisenShow

*JimmyinSD* · Today, 06:51 AM

(Yesterday, 01:03 PM)StickierBuns Wrote: VikingzFanPage
@vikingzfanpage
·
6m
There is “mutual interest” between the #Vikings and #Colts QB Anthony Richardson, who was just granted permission to seek a trade, per
@CameronWolfe
.
Minnesota is a team to keep an eye on.

trey wingo
@wingoz
·
6m

From 4th overall to likely traded before his 4th season….

If you can get him for a day 3 26 pick and maybe a conditional pick another year, then I would be good with this one. He wont be ready to really compete until mid season at the earliest, which is how long JJM should be given to show hes the man or not. If JJM shows good, AR stays in the bench, If Richardson can show any promise in the event that JJM fails you have a young guy that takes the pressure off having to hit on a qb in 27 as you could pivot to him being your QBOTF, while the new kid simmers in the back burner.

The only way I see us getting a top tier QB in 27 though is to jist give JJM the whole season and for him to be a total bust, which IMO isn't likely. Bringing in a competent back up will just make it to hard to get into position to pick a blue chip prospect so then we are back to getting 4th or 5th guy off the board or burning a ton pf picks to move up and not addressing our other positions.

JR44 · 8 hours ago

(Yesterday, 01:03 PM)StickierBuns Wrote: VikingzFanPage
@vikingzfanpage
·
6m
There is “mutual interest” between the #Vikings and #Colts QB Anthony Richardson, who was just granted permission to seek a trade, per
@CameronWolfe

This makes sense in that it was heavily reported that the Vikes tried very hard to move up to draft him, the question would be was it Kwesi or KOC who really wanted him.

It doesn't make sense from where our QB room currently is, he would come in with many of the same issues as JJM has had in terms of accuracy and durability. While JJM was a 57% completion rate, Richardson has been 50% in 17 games, that is just crazy. No thank you!

If we were going to gamble on a younger guy with upside, my choice by far would be Will Levis.