Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Birdies releasing Kirko...
#11
(7 hours ago)MaroonBells Wrote: There is no problem. He's definitely someone who should be in the running, and likely near the top. People hate this or that idea "because he hasn't won a Super Bowl" or "we already tried that" or "he's too old" or "he doesn't fit our offense" or "he doesn't fit our culture." 

To that I say, all QBs in your 20s who've won a Super Bowl, haven't played for us before, and who fit our offense and culture, please take one step forward.

If he could have taken a step forward he wouldn't have gotten hit so much and the OL wouldn't have  looked as bad.  Between kirks total lack of mobility to extend plays,  and KOC'S play designs,  its a disaster plan.  Think about how many hits Wentz took,  kirk is less mobile..
Why isn't Chuck Foreman in the Hall of Fame?
[-] The following 2 users Like JimmyinSD's post:
  
Reply

#12
(5 hours ago)JimmyinSD Wrote: If he could have taken a step forward he wouldn't have gotten hit so much and the OL wouldn't have  looked as bad.  Between kirks total lack of mobility to extend plays,  and KOC'S play designs,  its a disaster plan.  Think about how many hits Wentz took,  kirk is less mobile..

He's also a much, MUCH better quarterback...or at least he was 2 years ago. And therein lies my concern with him. He was OK in Atlanta, but not up to his standards. Is he washed? Or would he once again look fantastic in this offense? Dunno, but it's a give and take. There is no perfect option.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 Melroy van den Berg.