Posts: 1,451
Threads: 188
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation:
1,089
(12-10-2025, 06:43 PM)purplefaithful Wrote: Nope, pounding the drum for Love LOL! All RB's are not created equal 
Supa, you need to chime in here. You're a Golden Domer.
As an aside, is there a better name for a corner from LSU than Mansoor Delane???
Crank-up the tunes Jimmy!
Love is an absolute stud and makes the difficult look routine. My worry is that OConnell wouldn't even know how to use him, or just flat out refuses to use him because he wants to throw the ball all over the field. As much as it pains me to say, we'd probably get more bang for our buck out of a boundary corner. If you had a coach who wasn't allergic to the run or really utilized the running game...different story
The following 1 user Likes supafreak84's post:1 user Likes supafreak84's post
Posts: 831
Threads: 29
Joined: Mar 2014
Reputation:
609
(12-10-2025, 07:07 PM)supafreak84 Wrote: Love is an absolute stud and makes the difficult look routine. My worry is that OConnell wouldn't even know how to use him, or just flat out refuses to use him because he wants to throw the ball all over the field. As much as it pains me to say, we'd probably get more bang for our buck out of a boundary corner. If you had a coach who wasn't allergic to the run or really utilized the running game...different story
Alternately, maybe if we had a flashy runner, he'd learn to love the run
The following 2 users Like medaille's post:2 users Like medaille's post

Posts: 901
Threads: 211
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
523
(12-10-2025, 07:07 PM)supafreak84 Wrote: Love is an absolute stud and makes the difficult look routine. My worry is that OConnell wouldn't even know how to use him, or just flat out refuses to use him because he wants to throw the ball all over the field. As much as it pains me to say, we'd probably get more bang for our buck out of a boundary corner. If you had a coach who wasn't allergic to the run or really utilized the running game...different story
To make JJM work, we’re going to have to adapt. So you either draft RBs who can function with him or ditch JJM.
The following 1 user Likes AGRforever's post:1 user Likes AGRforever's post
Posts: 831
Threads: 29
Joined: Mar 2014
Reputation:
609
Also, if we have to look at "should we invest in our offense getting better or our defense getting better", it kind of feels like our offense is still holding our defense back. What position on offense could we draft and be a viable upgrade? WR ... set. OL ... maybe center, but pretty set. We're kind of just looking at TE and RB, both less premium positions in the draft.
I'm more amenable to a game changing back than perhaps at any time in recent history. Probably smarter to upgrade the DBs, but I generally trust Flores to do more with less.
The following 3 users Like medaille's post:3 users Like medaille's post
 
Posts: 1,451
Threads: 188
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation:
1,089
(12-10-2025, 08:18 PM)medaille Wrote: Alternately, maybe if we had a flashy runner, he'd learn to love the run
We've had some good runners since he's been the coach. Dalvin Cook, Aaron Jones, Cam Akers all three times (kidding). I think Jordan Mason has been criminally underused this year. Doesn't matter who he's had in the backfield, he just refuses to commit to the run or running a balanced play sheet. Again, since he's been the head coach the Vikings rank 31st in rushing attempts and that really says it all. He'd run Love 8-10 times a game and that to me isn't worth a top pick.
The following 2 users Like supafreak84's post:2 users Like supafreak84's post

Posts: 2,193
Threads: 286
Joined: May 2013
Reputation:
1,478
12-10-2025, 08:49 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-10-2025, 08:54 PM by JimmyinSD.)
(12-10-2025, 06:43 PM)purplefaithful Wrote: Nope, pounding the drum for Love LOL! All RB's are not created equal 
Supa, you need to chime in here. You're a Golden Domer.
As an aside, is there a better name for a corner from LSU than Mansoor Delane???
Crank-up the tunes Jimmy!
I too love drafting Irish, but I dont care who the RB played for, I dont want him in the first round.
Why isn't Chuck Foreman in the Hall of Fame?
The following 1 user Likes JimmyinSD's post:1 user Likes JimmyinSD's post
Posts: 932
Threads: 241
Joined: May 2013
Reputation:
565
(12-10-2025, 08:18 PM)medaille Wrote: Alternately, maybe if we had a flashy runner, he'd learn to love the run
With a healthy o-line and the best Love in the division, it could work.
Posts: 894
Threads: 47
Joined: Jul 2017
Reputation:
556
Yesterday, 08:58 AM
(This post was last modified: Yesterday, 08:58 AM by pattersaur.)
It’s been a decade plus since Rhodes were Closed around here. If there’s a Stingley or Gardner type on the board (is there?) the Vikings should and imo will run to the podium.
Edit- Keep Wilson
Posts: 1,451
Threads: 188
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation:
1,089
Yesterday, 10:50 AM
(This post was last modified: Yesterday, 10:51 AM by supafreak84.)
https://youtu.be/-2ShRgkwvDg?si=p1-72BZzdSnIo2X4
Thor did a pretty decent breakdown yesterday on some draft prospects that could be in play for the Vikings. Sounds like there's a probability by seasons end we'll be drafting in that 9 to 12 range according to their statistical probabilities. Just my thoughts on a couple guys he talks about;
Downs- I like him although he does play safety and taking one in the top 15 would be difficult for me to do personally. Also, he's short, and the measurables on him will be something to monitor.
Love- As I mentioned in the other thread, electric player, I just don't trust KOC to ever really commit to the run or use him properly so might be a wasted pick
Delane- I still see this as the most likely pick. Top corner on a lot of draft boards and a boundary corner is a big need for the Vikings
Sadiq- on the freak list for this draft, he's probably the top guy. A lot will depend on what happens with Hockenson, but with as much as McCarthy likes to utilize TE's dating all the way back to college, I could see Sadiq being a worthwhile pick even if Hockenson is retained
Posts: 8,111
Threads: 3,955
Joined: May 2013
Reputation:
3,357
Yesterday, 11:07 AM
(This post was last modified: Yesterday, 11:07 AM by purplefaithful.)
(Yesterday, 10:50 AM)supafreak84 Wrote: https://youtu.be/-2ShRgkwvDg?si=p1-72BZzdSnIo2X4
Thor did a pretty decent breakdown yesterday on some draft prospects that could be in play for the Vikings. Sounds like there's a probability by seasons end we'll be drafting in that 9 to 12 range according to their statistical probabilities. Just my thoughts on a couple guys he talks about;
Downs- I like him although he does play safety and taking one in the top 15 would be difficult for me to do personally. Also, he's short, and the measurables on him will be something to monitor.
Love- As I mentioned in the other thread, electric player, I just don't trust KOC to ever really commit to the run or use him properly so might be a wasted pick
Delane- I still see this as the most likely pick. Top corner on a lot of draft boards and a boundary corner is a big need for the Vikings
Sadiq- on the freak list for this draft, he's probably the top guy. A lot will depend on what happens with Hockenson, but with as much as McCarthy likes to utilize TE's dating all the way back to college, I could see Sadiq being a worthwhile pick even if Hockenson is retained
Luv the Sadiq pick for JJM - not sure I love it at 11 though? Which is where I think we'll be.
Lots of needs across the board on D, I could very well see that being the pick and would support it - much as I would love to be rooting for Love the next 6 seasons or so.
The following 1 user Likes purplefaithful's post:1 user Likes purplefaithful's post
|