7 hours ago
Browns game
|
7 hours ago
(8 hours ago)badgervike Wrote: Is anybody going to talk about it? On that touchdown play to Addison at the end, Skule (playing LT) was way offside. I kept looking for the flag during the celebration. Maybe Karma for the Will the Thrill kick hitting the wire. Should have been 2nd and 15 instead of a TD. Evidently Skule's new secret to keeping up with the defensive pressure is to get a head start. If it was anything it was a false start, but refs have been letting those split-second-early moves slide. Skule had done that a few times prior to that play. There's a tackle in Kansas City who does this habitually. I think his argument is that he's leaving on the count and the center is just a split second slow in snapping the ball. If it's close like that they tend to let it go.
7 hours ago
(7 hours ago)MaroonBells Wrote: If it was anything it was a false start, but refs have been letting those split-second-early moves slide. Skule had done that a few times prior to that play. There's a tackle in Kansas City who does this habitually. I think his argument is that he's leaving on the count and the center is just a split second slow in snapping the ball. If it's close like that they tend to let it go. Obviously what I meant. The coffee hasn't kicked in after a busy weekend.
7 hours ago
(7 hours ago)MaroonBells Wrote: If it was anything it was a false start, but refs have been letting those split-second-early moves slide. Skule had done that a few times prior to that play. There's a tackle in Kansas City who does this habitually. I think his argument is that he's leaving on the count and the center is just a split second slow in snapping the ball. If it's close like that they tend to let it go. Yeah, they’ve been letting tackles go slightly early for a few years now. I think the general rule is if the back foot doesn’t land before the snap, they’re more or less not getting called for it. Not a “rule” I’m in favor of, but if the league is allowing it across the board, then we shouldn’t be holding ourselves to a higher standard that makes our lives more difficult.
7 hours ago
(7 hours ago)medaille Wrote: Yeah, they’ve been letting tackles go slightly early for a few years now. I think the general rule is if the back foot doesn’t land before the snap, they’re more or less not getting called for it. Not a “rule” I’m in favor of, but if the league is allowing it across the board, then we shouldn’t be holding ourselves to a higher standard that makes our lives more difficult. interesting. I didn't know about that rule, but have seen that repeatedly from other teams and wondered why it wasn't called. Now I know.
6 hours ago
(This post was last modified: 6 hours ago by badgervike.)
(7 hours ago)medaille Wrote: Yeah, they’ve been letting tackles go slightly early for a few years now. I think the general rule is if the back foot doesn’t land before the snap, they’re more or less not getting called for it. Not a “rule” I’m in favor of, but if the league is allowing it across the board, then we shouldn’t be holding ourselves to a higher standard that makes our lives more difficult. Maybe they're trying to counter the league emphasis on the Tackles being on the line of scrimmage? They used to ignore if the Tackles lined up slightly off the line of scrimmage
6 hours ago
(8 hours ago)pattersaur Wrote: I think I agree with all of this. Dillon Gabriel was not a major threat passing the ball and that allowed our defense to play pretty well, despite Judkins running strong and getting yardage all day.I knew that Gabriel did not have the physical stature that your typical NFL QB has, which is why his stock dropped during the draft. Oregon keeps putting QBs in the NFL. But that brief image on TV after the game with 6'5" Wentz talking down to 5'11" Gabriel spoke volumes to me. |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |