Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Pack is for real, But
#11
(11 hours ago)greediron Wrote: I watched both games.  Their D is better than it was last year.  Parson's will do that for a D. But I see he is already whining about not getting enough playing time.

Their offense has been ok.  TE Clark was left wide open by the commanders.  He ran free repeatedly, not sure what that was about.  They schemed some good openings, but I didn't see anything special by their WRs or Love.  Most of his hits were easy throws and he hasn't been hit or hurried in the first 2 weeks.  Their o-line is a weakness, but neither team seemed to bring any pressure.  Leave alone and comfortable, LaFleur is going to get people open.  But bring some heat and Love's accuracy suffers.

Their O line is a stregth but Thursday night two starters were missing. Once their WRs pick up their game (Golden etc.) Look out. I have watched both of their games and when you take the purple glasses off, they look pretty impressive compared to what I have seen around the league so far.
Reply

#12
(11 hours ago)kmillard Wrote: Their O line is a stregth but Thursday night two starters were missing. Once their WRs pick up their game (Golden etc.) Look out. I have watched both of their games and when you take the purple glasses off, they look pretty impressive compared to what I have seen around the league so far.

I have watched both games.  I wasn't impressed with their offense.  Like I detailed above.  The commanders were sluggish and played soft on D, letting guys like Clark run wide open.  They brought no pressure to test those backups on the o-line.  

Maybe your pessimism is tainting your view.
Reply

#13
(11 hours ago)greediron Wrote: I have watched both games.  I wasn't impressed with their offense.  Like I detailed above.  The commanders were sluggish and played soft on D, letting guys like Clark run wide open.  They brought no pressure to test those backups on the o-line.  

Maybe your pessimism is tainting your view.

Nah, I think its your glasses. Kraft is the TE BTW.
Reply

#14
They have a solid team. Defense is greatly improved and Love has been playing really well. Scary now that he have multiple WR that can stretch the field, a very good TE and that Savion Willians is not bad either
[-] The following 1 user Likes mblack's post:
  
Reply

#15
(11 hours ago)kmillard Wrote: Nah, I think its your glasses. Kraft is the TE BTW.

You are correct about one thing, it is Kraft.  My mistake.
Reply

#16
(5 hours ago)greediron Wrote: You are correct about one thing, it is Kraft.  My mistake.

It's all good. Only football after all.
Reply

#17
The Vikings offense hasn't struggled against 6'3 250 OLBs like Parsons or Gary

It's been the Kenny Clark's and Hakeem Nick's defensive lineman that would cause problems. The 6'4 325+ lb defensive lineman that the Vikings had no answer for


Parsons and Gary are very good players, watching them square off versus O'Neill and darrisaw will be worth the price of admission.

This is Clarks 9th year he has 35 in his career, 7 of which were against the Vikings.

watching Clark versus the Vikings new interior offensive line, was gonna be a fair litmus test on how much the oline has improved this year.

addition of Parsons by the subtraction of Clark doesn't scan for me.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 Melroy van den Berg.