Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Charlie Kirk Shot
#21
(Yesterday, 02:00 PM)badgervike Wrote: VG..I respectfully disagree.  You obviously haven't spent much time listening to him...but you were comfortable saying that he spread a lot of hate...now watered down to "I don't agree with him".  We need to get beyond calling people that disagree with you Nazis, Fascists, Purveyors of Hate, etc.  Can't we just simply disagree?

Both are true. He spread hate and I don't agree with him. I also don't advocate violence. I want to see the person that took his life face consequences for his actions. We clearly disagree.
Reply

#22
(Yesterday, 02:24 PM)Vikergirl Wrote: Both are true. He spread hate and I don't agree with him. I also don't advocate violence. I want to see the person that took his life face consequences for his actions. We clearly disagree.

I think you clearly aren't informed enough to agree or disagree in reality.

Internet detective work. Let's see if it's accurate. The hateful lyrics of his/her song alone are enough that they deserve their name to be out there. There's a lot of facebook comparisons going on as well. The ammo and weapon were by all accounts littered with antifa / trans slogans. It's kind of evident where this is headed, I think.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/09...-may-have/
Reply

#23
(Yesterday, 02:24 PM)Vikergirl Wrote: Both are true. He spread hate and I don't agree with him. I also don't advocate violence. I want to see the person that took his life face consequences for his actions. We clearly disagree.

Ahh....the ol' victim blaming.  Former Viking, Nate Burleson, did the same today:

"CBS Mornings" co-host Nate Burleson asked former Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy Thursday whether he felt Republicans need to "reflect" on their rhetoric after the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
Reply

#24
(Yesterday, 04:17 PM)badgervike Wrote: Ahh....the ol' victim blaming.  Former Viking, Nate Burleson, did the same today:

"CBS Mornings" co-host Nate Burleson asked former Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy Thursday whether he felt Republicans need to "reflect" on their rhetoric after the assassination of Charlie Kirk.

What? There is no victim blaming whatsoever. I see you like deflection. Yes absolutely reflection could be a good thing all around. I am sick and tired of gun violence but until both sides talk and take action, nothing will change. On a positive note, Sophie Forchas (Annunciation) has been upgraded from critical to serious condition.
Reply

#25
(Yesterday, 05:44 PM)Vikergirl Wrote: What? There is no victim blaming whatsoever. I see you like deflection. Yes absolutely reflection could be a good thing all around. I am sick and tired of gun violence but until both sides talk and take action, nothing will change. On a positive note, Sophie Forchas (Annunciation) has been upgraded from critical to serious condition.

Why bother engaging in the thread at all if you’re not informed enough to even back any of your points?  Tell us how he preached hate.  I sincerely doubt you’ve really ever even listened to him and probably need time to conduct a crash course to find anything to support your point.  You should be embarrassed by that. This guy didn’t see hate in Charlie’s message. My question for you is, why do you? Or better yet, do you have even one example to share?
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/09...ns-blasts/
Reply

#26
At the risk of offending some, I’ll add a video of the hateful crowd.

https://wset.com/news/local/liberty-univ...ember-2025
Reply

#27
More from the people spewing “hate”. I’m proud to be on their side.

Reply

#28
(Yesterday, 02:24 PM)Vikergirl Wrote: Both are true. He spread hate and I don't agree with him. I also don't advocate violence. I want to see the person that took his life face consequences for his actions. We clearly disagree.

No.  No he didn't.  This is simply not true.  Ive seen countless hours of his footage and his message has as been close to tolerance as any public figure has made in a long time.  Nobody with an open mind, and any rational thought process, could find a message of hate in his speaking.

He preached respect, even in disagreement and almost always showed respect to those that he engaged with.

As much as I hear of people from both sides calling for a figure that could shut down the rhetoric and attempt to bridge gaps through respectful discourse,  we lost our opportunity,  he was murdered yesterday.
Why isn't Chuck Foreman in the Hall of Fame?
[-] The following 2 users Like JimmyinSD's post:
  
Reply

#29
They got him. Sounds like he’s a ministers kid and that dad had the guts to turn him in. A stupid 22 yr old kid who ruined millions of lives because he was brainwashed.
Reply

#30
I keep seeing the same message from the left on Charlie, "he spread hate" these same words over and over, I would love to know how many of them have listened to more than choice snippets of his conversational debates, or even actually heard a full exchange from start to finish, or are simply repeating the programming that so many biased sources are echoing among themselves?
Why isn't Chuck Foreman in the Hall of Fame?
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
savannahskol, 2 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 Melroy van den Berg.