Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
He's right imo - and Vegas is unusually wrong
#1
The Vegas consensus is that the Vikings will win 8.5 games in 2025. I think they’ll get the .5 for beating 41-year-old Aaron Rodgers in a large pub in Dublin, but that’s just a guess.

Many Vegas sites that set the Vikings’ win total at 8.5 also predict they will fail to reach it.

The consensus of well-known NFL analysts seems to be that the Vikings are in some sort of rebuild mode because they will start J.J. McCarthy at quarterback after allowing Sam Darnold to leave.

All of which leaves the 2025 Vikings in an ideal position, emotionally.

They won 14 games last year with a refurbished quarterback. They’ve won 13 and 14 games in the two seasons in which the starting quarterback has remained healthy under head coach Kevin O’Connell.

In 2023, when everything went wrong, including quarterback Kirk Cousins and star receiver Justin Jefferson getting hurt, they still won seven games.

I believe the 2025 Vikings are better than the 2024 Vikings, that the division is weaker than it was a year ago because of the Lions’ personnel and coaching losses and that the lack of pressure being applied from outside the building puts this team in an ideal place:

They’re underrated, overlooked and improved.

I would expect the Vikings to address their cornerback and tight end depth issues as the season opener approaches. They signed Stephon Gilmore in late August last year, and that, or something similar, could happen this season.

There are three reasons so many national line-setters and analysts are downgrading the Vikings’ chances this season:

Yes, the division is tough, but the Bears have much to prove before they can be taken seriously. The Packers are good, but Jordan Love appeared to regress at least slightly last year. The Lions lost three of their best brains — offensive coordinator Ben Johnson, defensive coordinator Aaron Glenn and center Frank Ragnow.

Yes, the schedule looks difficult, but playing two road games against beatable teams at neutral sites constitutes an advantage.

Yes, McCarthy is an unknown, but I believe he will be a better and more reliable quarterback at the end of this season than Darnold was last year.

The Vikings’ supposed interest in Rodgers fooled many into thinking they weren’t high on McCarthy.

Here are the facts underlying the speculation: The Vikings never brought Rodgers in for an interview or made him an offer. The Steelers, who did both, were always going to sign him.

My prediction for the 2025 Vikings: McCarthy will play well, the defense will thrive in a third season under Brian Flores, and the Vikings will win a playoff game.


Startribune
[-] The following 4 users Like purplefaithful's post:
  
Reply

#2
The Vegas win total defies logic. It's obviously about JJ McCarthy. And that's fine. He's proven nothing. Has yet to take his first NFL snap. I get the "show me first" attitude that some people have. But it doesn't take much insight to see what other QBs have done in this offense. I think unless McCarthy is a bust on the level of, say, Josh Freeman, the Vikings are going to win most of their games. 

Is it that unusual for Vegas to wrong? What was their win total prediction for us last year? 7.5 I think. You might argue that it was impossible to predict Darnold would play well. But was it really?
Reply

#3
I keep thinking of Alex Smith, who set career passing records in 2016 and then again in 2017 (with a league leading passer rating), only to be traded to the Redskins in January of 2018. Andy Reid had a belief in Patrick Mahomes. Reid was obviously right. I'm hoping KOC's insight and judgement are right about JJM.
[-] The following 1 user Likes NorseFeathers's post:
  
Reply

#4
(7 hours ago)MaroonBells Wrote: The Vegas win total defies logic. It's obviously about JJ McCarthy. And that's fine. He's proven nothing. Has yet to take his first NFL snap. I get the "show me first" attitude that some people have. But it doesn't take much insight to see what other QBs have done in this offense. I think unless McCarthy is a bust on the level of, say, Josh Freeman, the Vikings are going to win most of their games. 

Is it that unusual for Vegas to wrong? What was their win total prediction for us last year? 7.5 I think. You might argue that it was impossible to predict Darnold would play well. But was it really?

Last year, Vegas had us at 6.5 wins initially, later updated to 7.5.  Retread QB bust as a placeholder. Coming off a 7 win season cobbled together with bubble gum and baling twine at QB.  The Passtronaut was exciting to watch in that half-baked season until he wasn't.

I could care less about the Vegas odds...I care about what I see on the field.
Reply

#5
Where does one bet against these odds? I’ve never made a sports bet.

I think they’re a 10-12 win team.
Reply

#6
This line has either moved to 9/9.5 or been juiced to -155 or higher, effectively making it 9.5. In other words, money has come in on the over. The uncertainty of how to eval JJM is the main reason it is still a significant drop from last season, along with a harder schedule.

Money on season win totals tells you what pro bettors think and they are generally better predictors of outcomes than pundits, fans, etc.
[-] The following 1 user Likes comet52's post:
  
Reply

#7
(16 minutes ago)comet52 Wrote: This line has either moved to 9/9.5 or been juiced to -155 or higher, effectively making it 9.5.  In other words, money has come in on the over.  The uncertainty of how to eval JJM is the main reason it is still a significant drop from last season, along with a harder schedule. 

Money on season win totals tells you what pro bettors think and they are generally better predictors of outcomes than pundits, fans, etc.

9.0-9.5 is still low imo, but not as egregious as b4. 

But yah, clearly shows where the $$ has been placed. 

There's still time to get in lol!
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
3 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 Melroy van den Berg.