Best front 7 in the NFL? Your Minnesota Vikings

[StickierBuns]

https://www.sharpfootballanalysis.com/an...-rankings/

1. Minnesota Vikings
The biggest mover across our entire rankings was the Minnesota front seven, which jumped 24 spots to No. 1 this year. The Vikings added both Jonathan Allen and Javon Hargrave to a defensive front that finished sixth in pressure rate and fourth in sacks last season.

Warren Sharp
@SharpFootball
·
Best front sevens in 2025:

1. Vikings
2. Broncos
3. Steelers
4. Giants
5. Texans
6. Browns
7. Jets
8. Eagles
9. Bills
10. Lions
11. Seahawks
12. Cowboys
13. Raiders
14. 49ers
15. Ravens
16. Chiefs
17. Rams
18. Colts
19. Dolphins
20. Bears
21. Chargers
22. Buccaneers
23. Patriots
24. Commanders
25. Packers
26. Bengals
27. Jaguars
28. Cardinals
29. Panthers
30. Saints
31. Titans
32. Falcons

[JR44]

I think our edge rushers are top 5 in the league, but I wouldn't rank the rest of front 7 in the top tier. Not sure how they are ranking this, do not see us anywhere close to a top 5 overall.

[MaroonBells]

I think our edge rushers are top 5 in the league, but I wouldn't rank the rest of front 7 in the top tier.  Not sure how they are ranking this, do not see us anywhere close to a top 5 overall.

So a defensive front that finished 6th in pressure rate and 4th in sacks last year, then added two Pro Bowl DTs shouldn't be "anywhere close to top 5?"

[Montana Tom]

Two observations:
1) Does the addition of Hargraves and Allen in fact give us a grade to move us to the top of the class? What is the methodology that Warren Sharp used to make these evaluations? And what are his qualifications to make that evaluation?
2) All things being equal, I like where the Packers, Lions and Bears respectively sit in this same evaluation.

[greediron]

Two observations:
1) Does the addition of Hargraves and Allen in fact give us a grade to move us to the top of the class?  What is the methodology that Warren Sharp used to make these evaluations?  And what are his qualifications to make that evaluation?
2) All things being equal, I like where the Packers, Lions and Bears respectively sit in this same evaluation.

Offseason clickbait?  Probably.  Hard to rank teams with new players honestly.  Are the Eagles really that far down the list?