Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The man’s on a mission..
#1
Mideast peace on the horizon?  It’s just incredible the difference true leadership can make 

https://www.newsmatwitter.com/newsmax-tv...d/1216478/
Reply

#2
(06-25-2025, 06:33 PM)Waterboy Wrote: Mideast peace on the horizon?  It’s just incredible the difference true leadership can make 

https://www.newsmatwitter.com/newsmax-tv...d/1216478/

You get your Daily dose of Trump fluffing out of your system?  I can never see any of your Newsmax posts but gathered from the title it was about the Abraham Accords and possible expansion.  Certainly, neutering Iran will jump start those discussions but I can't see any movement until the Gaza situation is settled.  No Middle East country is going to jump on a peace agreement with Israel...while they're occupying Gaza.
[-] The following 1 user Likes badgervike's post:
  
Reply

#3
(Yesterday, 03:24 PM)badgervike Wrote: You get your Daily dose of Trump fluffing out of your system?  I can never see any of your Newsmax posts but gathered from the title it was about the Abraham Accords and possible expansion.  Certainly, neutering Iran will jump start those discussions but I can't see any movement until the Gaza situation is settled.  No Middle East country is going to jump on a peace agreement with Israel...while they're occupying Gaza.
I believe Syria and Lebanon are already on board and there are reasons more that the Iran Israel negotiation will involve Gaza.  I guess it’s fluffing when a guy has removed a nuclear threat from a rogue regime that was developing ICBM’s and highly enriched uranium. I guess it’s also fluff when the guy is on the verge of creating peace in the Mideast. Maybe people could and should see what the guy is accomplishing?   I think him achieving or on the verge of achieving these objectives may be worthy of mention, but that’s me.
Reply

#4
(Yesterday, 03:53 PM)Waterboy Wrote: I believe Syria and Lebanon are already on board and there are reasons more that the Iran Israel negotiation will involve Gaza.  I guess it’s fluffing when a guy has removed a nuclear threat from a rogue regime that was developing ICBM’s and highly enriched uranium. I guess it’s also fluff when the guy is on the verge of creating peace in the Mideast. Maybe people could and should see what the guy is accomplishing?   I think him achieving or on the verge of achieving these objectives may be worthy of mention, but that’s me.

I still have a worry about Iran and their nuclear ambitions.  If we assume Iran's 60% processed Uranium isn't buried under a mountain of rubble, I could certainly imagine Iran trading 60% processed Uranium and oil to somebody like North Korea for 90% metalized Uranium.  Lots of moving parts...a little early to be taking victory laps.

I think a lot of countries have agreed in principle to the Abraham accords...but it all hinges on resolving Gaza first.
Reply

#5
(Yesterday, 04:06 PM)badgervike Wrote: I still have a worry about Iran and their nuclear ambitions.  If we assume Iran's 60% processed Uranium isn't buried under a mountain of rubble, I could certainly imagine Iran trading 60% processed Uranium and oil to somebody like North Korea for 90% metalized Uranium.  Lots of moving parts...a little early to be taking victory laps.

I think a lot of countries have agreed in principle to the Abraham accords...but it all hinges on resolving Gaza first.

I’m pretty sure NK could give them a loaded nuke easier than the scenario you’re describing.  If Israel felt that the issue was not contained with their intelligence, there would not be a ceasefire.
Reply

#6
(Yesterday, 04:19 PM)Waterboy Wrote: I’m pretty sure NK could give them a loaded nuke easier than the scenario you’re describing.  If Israel felt that the issue was not contained with their intelligence, there would not be a ceasefire.

then here you have proven his case,  no time for victory laps or puffing ones chest,  that bombing run has only slowed their ability to become nuclear,  honestly there are so many ways for them to get nukes,  them developing their own almost seems stupid.  I am sure there are still warehouses of former soviet nukes laying around.
Why isn't Chuck Foreman in the Hall of Fame?
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
badgervike, 1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 Melroy van den Berg.