Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Vikings sign CB Isaiah Rodgers
#11
Isaiah Rodgers
2024: Run 81; coverage 74
2023: Suspended
2022: Run 76; coverage 82
2021: Run 71; coverage 72
2020: Run 75; coverage 85

Byron Murphy
2024: Run 67; coverage 73
2023: Run 65; coverage 58
2022: Run 73; coverage 63
2021: Run 55; coverage 62
[-] The following 1 user Likes MaroonBells's post:
  
Reply

#12


(03-10-2025, 01:05 PM)MaroonBells Wrote: Isaiah Rodgers
2024: Run 81; coverage 74
2023: Suspended
2022: Run 76; coverage 82
2021: Run 71; coverage 72
2020: Run 75; coverage 85

Byron Murphy
2024: Run 67; coverage 73
2023: Run 65; coverage 58
2022: Run 73; coverage 63
2021: Run 55; coverage 62
Don’t confuse them with data.
“Hell is empty and all the devils are here”

Shakespeare 
Reply

#13
(03-10-2025, 01:05 PM)JustInTime Wrote:

Don’t confuse them with data.

...or misleading data. Murphy ranked 6th overall in snaps played last year. Rodgers 113th.
Reply

#14
“Hell is empty and all the devils are here”

Shakespeare 
Reply

#15
(03-10-2025, 01:20 PM)supafreak84 Wrote: ...or misleading data. Murphy ranked 6th overall in snaps played last year. Rodgers 113th.

Even better if you extrapolate. Rodgers was behind Slay, DeJean and Mitchell.
Reply

#16
(03-10-2025, 01:20 PM)supafreak84 Wrote: ...or misleading data. Murphy ranked 6th overall in snaps played last year. Rodgers 113th.

Smaller sample size = misleading?

Ok.
“Hell is empty and all the devils are here”

Shakespeare 
Reply

#17
(03-10-2025, 01:24 PM)MaroonBells Wrote: Even better if you extrapolate. Rodgers was behind Slay, DeJean and Mitchell.

Or worse

(03-10-2025, 01:28 PM)JustInTime Wrote: Smaller sample size = misleading?

Ok.

Yes lol. 700+ snaps less than Murphy
Reply

#18
Its a meh signing. We'll put some lipstick on it, but it is what it is.
[-] The following 1 user Likes StickierBuns's post:
  
Reply

#19
Prototypical Kwesi signing. Younger player in his physical prime, underused with upside signed to a shorter “prove it” deal.

Extend if it works out.
[-] The following 1 user Likes CFIAvike's post:
  
Reply

#20
(03-10-2025, 01:32 PM)StickierBuns Wrote: Its a meh signing. We'll put some lipstick on it, but it is what it is.

Considering our backfield is currently mostly a vacant lot, quality depth is a good start!
[-] The following 2 users Like Kentis's post:
  
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
13 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 Melroy van den Berg.