5 hours ago
(6 hours ago)StickierBuns Wrote: lol, they do? Listen, never heard that before. But I've seen plenty of people bashing it. I'm open to revision with my opinion but it doesn't appear to align with putting eyes on the games often. The people 'reviewing' is where the issue lies and that's where the skepticism resides from many.
Yes, they do. Like I said, it's not perfect, especially in small sample sizes, but over the course of several games or a season, it becomes more and more accurate. That's just the nature of data.
Be skeptical all you want, but it has value, especially for people who tend to label data "horseshit" when it doesn't sync with their preconceptions.
