Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Will The Game Get Moved ?
#11
LA fire damage could reach $57B
By Andrew Barker, Editor at LinkedIn News
With major wildfires still raging in the Los Angeles area, the disaster is already taking an economic toll. Preliminary estimates from AccuWeather say the cost of the damage could range from $52 to $57 billion, while its impact on an insurance market already under strain remains to be seen. Underwriters had already begun dropping customers in areas deemed at risk for wildfires before this week's conflagration. Regulators were pushing carriers to reopen business in the state.

And the situation was already tumultuous before these fires:
California Was Already in Home-Insurance Crisis Before Los Angeles Infernos
Industry officials warn of widespread economic damage on par with some of biggest fire disasters in recent memory
https://www.wsj.com/finance/california-home-insurance-los-angeles-palisades-fire-3cce96a9?st=nS6v8V&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink

'State legislation has artificially suppressed home-insurance premiums in California, disregarding the true risks and replacement costs. The devastating fires now raging in Southern California should finally push even the most shortsighted politicians to recognize the urgent need for reform. It's time to allow insurance companies to set rates based on actual risk rather than restrictive regulations.
Many insurers have already stopped writing policies in California, while others are dropping clients altogether. This leaves homeowners with no choice but to turn to the state's 'Fair Plan,' which is both significantly more expensive and offers far less coverage.'
Reply

#12
Admittedly I am naive on the subject of Insurance is a scam. From what I read (take it for what its worth) Insurance companies pointed out the potential problems with fire dangers in this area. They wanted to raise prices to cover the risks. The Governor denied their ability to do so. So they cancelled policies and moved on. Saw a clip on Joe Rogan pod cast where someone was describing a few years back it was a question of not if but when this would happen. A solution was presented but due to environmental policies no action was taken. Again I am no expert so I am open to listen and learn.
[-] The following 1 user Likes Still Hurtn's post:
  
Reply

#13
What's happening is very scary. I'm sure the game will get moved but you wonder how many Rams players/staffers/interns/whoever are being affected by this either directly or with their families. Extremely sad.

On the football side:

Pros- Road Game moves to neutral site.

Cons- Anyone remember '09? Refs in that Saints game sure seemed to want the post-Katrina New Orleans fans to go home happy, didn't they?
[-] The following 2 users Like pattersaur's post:
  
Reply

#14
This ^^^^

A Rams "win" would represent the same "moral victory" as post-Katrina.

That...AND....The NFL doesn't want to see Lions / Vikings part III, after last weeks shart
[-] The following 1 user Likes Vanguard83's post:
  
Reply

#15
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
4 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 Melroy van den Berg.