The attentive know the answer: MOST OF 'EM.
The story about CBS sanitizing "Heels Up Harris'" answer is widespread, I was even able to find a mainstream report on it:
ABC drops dime on CBS
I figure they gave her at least 3 chances at any question she had trouble with, for later editing. Maybe 4-5?
[url=https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/trumps-complaints-60-minutes-put-spotlight-editing-nations-114702252][/url]
Then again, with the Trumplestilskin, it's not a rare practice:
No, Badger, this is not MY quote:
“Trump is a really difficult figure to cover because he challenges news media processes every day, has for years,” The Times’ Maggie Haberman, one of Trump’s best-known chroniclers, told NPR last month. “The systems ... were not built to deal with somebody who says things that are not true as often as he does or speaks as incoherently as he often does. I think the media has actually done a good job showing people who he is, what he says, what he does.”
I looked up a few articles on this, and the funny, common thread is that it seems like some of the news outlets most accused of "picking on the Donald" actually turn his sputtering word spittle into real sentences for him; and actually make him look MORE sane than the straight footage from his rallies.
The story about CBS sanitizing "Heels Up Harris'" answer is widespread, I was even able to find a mainstream report on it:
ABC drops dime on CBS
I figure they gave her at least 3 chances at any question she had trouble with, for later editing. Maybe 4-5?
[url=https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/trumps-complaints-60-minutes-put-spotlight-editing-nations-114702252][/url]
Then again, with the Trumplestilskin, it's not a rare practice:
No, Badger, this is not MY quote:
“Trump is a really difficult figure to cover because he challenges news media processes every day, has for years,” The Times’ Maggie Haberman, one of Trump’s best-known chroniclers, told NPR last month. “The systems ... were not built to deal with somebody who says things that are not true as often as he does or speaks as incoherently as he often does. I think the media has actually done a good job showing people who he is, what he says, what he does.”
I looked up a few articles on this, and the funny, common thread is that it seems like some of the news outlets most accused of "picking on the Donald" actually turn his sputtering word spittle into real sentences for him; and actually make him look MORE sane than the straight footage from his rallies.
LET'S WREAK SOME FUGGIN' HAVOK, VIKINGS!!! SKOL!!!
![[-]](https://vikefans.com/forums/images/duende_v3_local/collapse.png)
