Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Hey, 4/0 is 4&0
#21
[Image: GYvFN-cWkAAk6Rc?format=jpg&name=small]
[-] The following 1 user Likes StickierBuns's post:
  
Reply

#22
One game at a time. One game at a time. We started out 4-0 in 2016 and failed to make the playoffs with an 8-8 record. Next up...ayahuasca boy and the Jets in London.
[-] The following 4 users Like badgervike's post:
  
Reply

#23
I actually am old enough to remember the Jim Mora "PLAYOFFS?!!!" press conference, I was watching it with a friend at the time. I have to admit, it stuck with me...and yeah, it resonates with our 4-0 standing right now.

Every bit of energy, study, preparation always has to be on the NEXT GAME...and as much as I despise the micro-tripping clown at QB for the Jets, he's dangerous as hell when things go his way.

None of these games are gimmes, any given Sunday brings what it brings. We knocked off the eventual NFC Superbowl team on the way to a cascade of injuries last season.

Get to the UK, it's all about beating the Jets.
LET'S WREAK SOME FUGGIN' HAVOK, VIKINGS!!! SKOL!!!
Reply

#24
(09-30-2024, 08:13 AM)MAD GAINZ Wrote: No, they were already up 9 (two scores) and if you get the first down, the game is OVER.  Going up 12 doesn't get you an advantage.  If we didn't get it, the Packers are pinned inside the 5 with no timeouts and have to score twice in two minutes to win.  You go for it 10/10 times in that situation.

That's what I thought at the time.  However, kicking the FG insured the Pack could not get a touchdown, recover the onside kick and beat you with a FG.  That seemed so unlikely until they went through our defense like swiss cheese and that potential actually reared its head.
Reply

#25
(09-30-2024, 12:58 PM)badgervike Wrote: One game at a time.  One game at a time.  We started out 4-0 in 2016 and failed to make the playoffs with an 8-8 record.  Next up...ayahuasca boy and the Jets in London.

Nate Poole...

Ugh, was that a Tice team?
Reply

#26
(09-30-2024, 01:17 PM)PurplePorsche Wrote: That's what I thought at the time.  However, kicking the FG insured the Pack could not get a touchdown, recover the onside kick and beat you with a FG.  That seemed so unlikely until they went through our defense like swiss cheese and that potential actually reared its head.

I just come back to the risk vs reward.  If we get the first, the Packers have no time outs and we can essentially run out the rest of the clock and win. We score a TD on that play, we're still up 2 scores. Game over.

If we don't get it, we're still up two scores (9 points) and the Packers need to drive 95 yds for a TD, recover an onside kick, AND get 20+ yds, AND make a long FG (which their kicker missed 2 FGs already) to win with no timeouts left.

I'm totally fine with the decision to go for it.

(09-30-2024, 12:39 PM)StickierBuns Wrote: https://twitter.com/EmmanuelAcho/status/...8777055323

Oooooooo, keep talking Emmanuel.  Straight up facts.

BOOM
Reply

#27
[-] The following 2 users Like StickierBuns's post:
  
Reply

#28
(09-30-2024, 12:44 PM)MaroonBells Wrote: Ha! Love it...

"Dear NFL Fans, no matter how good you think the Vikings are, they’re even better."

The Vikings, they're not play'in no games
Reply

#29
(09-30-2024, 01:44 PM)StickierBuns Wrote: https://twitter.com/TheHerd/status/1840821413307171155

He's right...

Its a QB/Head Coach league now. 

I think I've seen enough of KOC now to feel comfortable saying very glad he was our hire.
Reply

#30
(09-30-2024, 05:04 PM)purplefaithful Wrote: He's right...

Its a QB/Head Coach league now. 

I think I've seen enough of KOC now to feel comfortable saying very glad he was our hire.

Now if only you’ll admit Jefferson can catch!  Tongue
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
3 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 Melroy van den Berg.