04-22-2024, 06:28 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-22-2024, 06:31 PM by RS_Express.)
The Zach Wilson trade is another sign that the much-hyped bidding war for QB's 3-4 isn't going to happen. Reasons:
1. Of the 3 combatants, one was unarmed. Denver came in a spot behind the Vikings and without a 2nd round pick while right behind them the Raiders have 2 2nds and the Vikings starting ahead of Denver have 11 and 23. Both the Vikings and Vegas knew they could beat any Broncos offer, and the Broncos know it too.
2. "Eh, we're good". In the FA period, the Raiders added Minshew while the Vikings got Darnold. While neither is a long-term starter, both teams IMO would rather ride with them this year and build the roster rather than blow 3 1s on QB 3-4. See Kwesi's mention of a "walkaway price".
3. Division decision. If QB4 gets to #5 Chargers, the Vikings will likely have a clear field, as I believe the NYG want either a top WR or a trade down and the Chargers aren't going to deal a potential franchise QB to a division rival. The Vikings can then tell LA, "Take 11 and 23, or you can spend the next decade playing QBX 2 times a year as a Raider courtesy of NYG".
Now those 2 2nds for the Raiders are a problem for the Vikings because I can easily see Vegas tossing the Bears a 2nd for #9 or a 3rd for #10 to the Jets, but that a whole different issue than a multiple-1sts arms race into the top 4.
1. Of the 3 combatants, one was unarmed. Denver came in a spot behind the Vikings and without a 2nd round pick while right behind them the Raiders have 2 2nds and the Vikings starting ahead of Denver have 11 and 23. Both the Vikings and Vegas knew they could beat any Broncos offer, and the Broncos know it too.
2. "Eh, we're good". In the FA period, the Raiders added Minshew while the Vikings got Darnold. While neither is a long-term starter, both teams IMO would rather ride with them this year and build the roster rather than blow 3 1s on QB 3-4. See Kwesi's mention of a "walkaway price".
3. Division decision. If QB4 gets to #5 Chargers, the Vikings will likely have a clear field, as I believe the NYG want either a top WR or a trade down and the Chargers aren't going to deal a potential franchise QB to a division rival. The Vikings can then tell LA, "Take 11 and 23, or you can spend the next decade playing QBX 2 times a year as a Raider courtesy of NYG".
Now those 2 2nds for the Raiders are a problem for the Vikings because I can easily see Vegas tossing the Bears a 2nd for #9 or a 3rd for #10 to the Jets, but that a whole different issue than a multiple-1sts arms race into the top 4.