12-15-2023, 05:57 PM
Earlier this year I mentioned that I didn't think it was our blitz rate that made the defense so much better. We rushed just 3 and dropped 8 a LOT, and it seemed to be just as effective, if not moreso, than the heavy blitz packages. And maybe the reason it worked so well was because we mixed up the extremes--that Flores had no interest in "mid" blitzing. This article seems to support that, and says it much better than I did...
Minnesota's defense leads the league in blitz rate (54.4%). They are the only team that blitzes on more than 50% of opponent dropbacks. But they also rank second in the league in percentage of snaps rushing just three or fewer players. It’s not so much the consistent aggression that causes problems for opposing offenses, but the extreme variance of Minnesota’s pass rush.
When the Vikings blitz, they tend to overload. The Vikings actually rank dead last in the NFL in the percentage of blitzes that feature five rushers — i.e., sending just one extra rusher — but they lead the league in the percentage of their blitzes that feature six rushers and have the second-highest percentage of seven or more rushers.
https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-brian-flore...s-playoffs
Minnesota's defense leads the league in blitz rate (54.4%). They are the only team that blitzes on more than 50% of opponent dropbacks. But they also rank second in the league in percentage of snaps rushing just three or fewer players. It’s not so much the consistent aggression that causes problems for opposing offenses, but the extreme variance of Minnesota’s pass rush.
When the Vikings blitz, they tend to overload. The Vikings actually rank dead last in the NFL in the percentage of blitzes that feature five rushers — i.e., sending just one extra rusher — but they lead the league in the percentage of their blitzes that feature six rushers and have the second-highest percentage of seven or more rushers.
https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-brian-flore...s-playoffs