Quote: @HappyViking said:
@ JimmyinSD said:
@ Bullazin said:
@ medaille said:
Its a weird take to be qanon this qanon that, and then never mention epstein or maxwell.
A conspiracy theory is a theory without much evidence and it leads people to fill in the gaps with their imagination. The FBI sucked up a ton of evidence regarding epstein and the jons who were going to his island, and they hid it away from the public preventing us from knowing the information that is out there.
The government by hiding everything from the people creates conspiracy theorists. If you are against conspiracy theories, you should be for transparency.
If these journalists wanted to, they could put a ton of pressure on politicians to be transparent, but instead they focus on labeling people as kookie, but we're all conspiracy theorists now, and not by choice, and that label only works on the dumb.
Not an astute comparison if you ask me. As far as the FBI and other institutions hiding stuff, have you ever heard of the privacy act or the 4th amendment or the 3 ir 4 other amendments that imply privacy rights? You want law enforcement posting investigations updates on the federal register? This is not serious.
Kooks are gonna kook without education. And they fire other fence sitters up. This discussion goes back to the removed thread and a good idea was found in Rothschilds testimony i posted- he basically said fighting kook theories will have to happen in the communities.
what thread was "removed" I dont think we have ever deleted any threads on this site that I was aware of.
Bull is probably talking about the one you moved and kicked me out of. Is it your requirement for posters here to be as anti-woke as you, jimmy? I guess I better be careful or you'll "shut me up again", right?
nope, civility and avoiding topics the devolve into shit shows. you werent removed for your position on anything, you were removed because you werent able to remain civil in disagreement and that thread was headed for the ST board based on how it turned
Quote: @JimmyinSD said:
@ HappyViking said:
@ JimmyinSD said:
@ Bullazin said:
@ medaille said:
Its a weird take to be qanon this qanon that, and then never mention epstein or maxwell.
A conspiracy theory is a theory without much evidence and it leads people to fill in the gaps with their imagination. The FBI sucked up a ton of evidence regarding epstein and the jons who were going to his island, and they hid it away from the public preventing us from knowing the information that is out there.
The government by hiding everything from the people creates conspiracy theorists. If you are against conspiracy theories, you should be for transparency.
If these journalists wanted to, they could put a ton of pressure on politicians to be transparent, but instead they focus on labeling people as kookie, but we're all conspiracy theorists now, and not by choice, and that label only works on the dumb.
Not an astute comparison if you ask me. As far as the FBI and other institutions hiding stuff, have you ever heard of the privacy act or the 4th amendment or the 3 ir 4 other amendments that imply privacy rights? You want law enforcement posting investigations updates on the federal register? This is not serious.
Kooks are gonna kook without education. And they fire other fence sitters up. This discussion goes back to the removed thread and a good idea was found in Rothschilds testimony i posted- he basically said fighting kook theories will have to happen in the communities.
what thread was "removed" I dont think we have ever deleted any threads on this site that I was aware of.
Bull is probably talking about the one you moved and kicked me out of. Is it your requirement for posters here to be as anti-woke as you, jimmy? I guess I better be careful or you'll "shut me up again", right?
nope, civility and avoiding topics the devolve into shit shows. you werent removed for your position on anything, you were removed because you werent able to remain civil in disagreement and that thread was headed for the ST board based on how it turned
I've seen you give warnings to others before taking actions like that. I didn't get any warnings, but just got immediately kicked out. Then you go on and start voicing your anti-woke opinions knowing I can't respond. Very convenient for you to get heard over those you silence.
What I love about this movie is Rotten Tomatoes. The audiences all love it, but the critics find a way to ding it. One critic thought that people that voted for Trump might like it and thus a negative review. lol
Sound of Freedom - Rotten Tomatoes
Quote: @HappyViking said:
@ JimmyinSD said:
@ HappyViking said:
@ JimmyinSD said:
@ Bullazin said:
@ medaille said:
Its a weird take to be qanon this qanon that, and then never mention epstein or maxwell.
A conspiracy theory is a theory without much evidence and it leads people to fill in the gaps with their imagination. The FBI sucked up a ton of evidence regarding epstein and the jons who were going to his island, and they hid it away from the public preventing us from knowing the information that is out there.
The government by hiding everything from the people creates conspiracy theorists. If you are against conspiracy theories, you should be for transparency.
If these journalists wanted to, they could put a ton of pressure on politicians to be transparent, but instead they focus on labeling people as kookie, but we're all conspiracy theorists now, and not by choice, and that label only works on the dumb.
Not an astute comparison if you ask me. As far as the FBI and other institutions hiding stuff, have you ever heard of the privacy act or the 4th amendment or the 3 ir 4 other amendments that imply privacy rights? You want law enforcement posting investigations updates on the federal register? This is not serious.
Kooks are gonna kook without education. And they fire other fence sitters up. This discussion goes back to the removed thread and a good idea was found in Rothschilds testimony i posted- he basically said fighting kook theories will have to happen in the communities.
what thread was "removed" I dont think we have ever deleted any threads on this site that I was aware of.
Bull is probably talking about the one you moved and kicked me out of. Is it your requirement for posters here to be as anti-woke as you, jimmy? I guess I better be careful or you'll "shut me up again", right?
nope, civility and avoiding topics the devolve into shit shows. you werent removed for your position on anything, you were removed because you werent able to remain civil in disagreement and that thread was headed for the ST board based on how it turned
I've seen you give warnings to others before taking actions like that. I didn't get any warnings, but just got immediately kicked out. Then you go on and start voicing your anti-woke opinions knowing I can't respond. Very convenient for you to get heard over those you silence.
start a new thread and say what you want to say, but keep it civil. I dont silence anybody, you silenced yourself. as far as warnings, when I give them, all i get back is shit, so if I am getting shit either way, might as well just get it done right out of the gate. there are plenty of posters that I disagree with that dont get removed from threads, its because they dont violate board rules and are civil towards those they disagree with.
as far as I am concerned, it was over as soon as I removed you from that thread. Dont bring it into others threads please.
Quote: @JimmyinSD said:
@ HappyViking said:
@ JimmyinSD said:
@ HappyViking said:
@ JimmyinSD said:
@ Bullazin said:
@ medaille said:
Its a weird take to be qanon this qanon that, and then never mention epstein or maxwell.
A conspiracy theory is a theory without much evidence and it leads people to fill in the gaps with their imagination. The FBI sucked up a ton of evidence regarding epstein and the jons who were going to his island, and they hid it away from the public preventing us from knowing the information that is out there.
The government by hiding everything from the people creates conspiracy theorists. If you are against conspiracy theories, you should be for transparency.
If these journalists wanted to, they could put a ton of pressure on politicians to be transparent, but instead they focus on labeling people as kookie, but we're all conspiracy theorists now, and not by choice, and that label only works on the dumb.
Not an astute comparison if you ask me. As far as the FBI and other institutions hiding stuff, have you ever heard of the privacy act or the 4th amendment or the 3 ir 4 other amendments that imply privacy rights? You want law enforcement posting investigations updates on the federal register? This is not serious.
Kooks are gonna kook without education. And they fire other fence sitters up. This discussion goes back to the removed thread and a good idea was found in Rothschilds testimony i posted- he basically said fighting kook theories will have to happen in the communities.
what thread was "removed" I dont think we have ever deleted any threads on this site that I was aware of.
Bull is probably talking about the one you moved and kicked me out of. Is it your requirement for posters here to be as anti-woke as you, jimmy? I guess I better be careful or you'll "shut me up again", right?
nope, civility and avoiding topics the devolve into shit shows. you werent removed for your position on anything, you were removed because you werent able to remain civil in disagreement and that thread was headed for the ST board based on how it turned
I've seen you give warnings to others before taking actions like that. I didn't get any warnings, but just got immediately kicked out. Then you go on and start voicing your anti-woke opinions knowing I can't respond. Very convenient for you to get heard over those you silence.
start a new thread and say what you want to say, but keep it civil. I dont silence anybody, you silenced yourself. as far as warnings, when I give them, all i get back is shit, so if I am getting shit either way, might as well just get it done right out of the gate. there are plenty of posters that I disagree with that dont get removed from threads, its because they dont violate board rules and are civil towards those they disagree with.
as far as I am concerned, it was over as soon as I removed you from that thread. Dont bring it into others threads please.
I don't think you tried to be funny, but that's hilarious. I'm sure it didn't bother you at all when you removed me. Why would it, lol? I guess as long as you're Ok with your actions, nothing else matters.
Quote: @HappyViking said:
@ JimmyinSD said:
@ HappyViking said:
@ JimmyinSD said:
@ HappyViking said:
@ JimmyinSD said:
@ Bullazin said:
@ medaille said:
Its a weird take to be qanon this qanon that, and then never mention epstein or maxwell.
A conspiracy theory is a theory without much evidence and it leads people to fill in the gaps with their imagination. The FBI sucked up a ton of evidence regarding epstein and the jons who were going to his island, and they hid it away from the public preventing us from knowing the information that is out there.
The government by hiding everything from the people creates conspiracy theorists. If you are against conspiracy theories, you should be for transparency.
If these journalists wanted to, they could put a ton of pressure on politicians to be transparent, but instead they focus on labeling people as kookie, but we're all conspiracy theorists now, and not by choice, and that label only works on the dumb.
Not an astute comparison if you ask me. As far as the FBI and other institutions hiding stuff, have you ever heard of the privacy act or the 4th amendment or the 3 ir 4 other amendments that imply privacy rights? You want law enforcement posting investigations updates on the federal register? This is not serious.
Kooks are gonna kook without education. And they fire other fence sitters up. This discussion goes back to the removed thread and a good idea was found in Rothschilds testimony i posted- he basically said fighting kook theories will have to happen in the communities.
what thread was "removed" I dont think we have ever deleted any threads on this site that I was aware of.
Bull is probably talking about the one you moved and kicked me out of. Is it your requirement for posters here to be as anti-woke as you, jimmy? I guess I better be careful or you'll "shut me up again", right?
nope, civility and avoiding topics the devolve into shit shows. you werent removed for your position on anything, you were removed because you werent able to remain civil in disagreement and that thread was headed for the ST board based on how it turned
I've seen you give warnings to others before taking actions like that. I didn't get any warnings, but just got immediately kicked out. Then you go on and start voicing your anti-woke opinions knowing I can't respond. Very convenient for you to get heard over those you silence.
start a new thread and say what you want to say, but keep it civil. I dont silence anybody, you silenced yourself. as far as warnings, when I give them, all i get back is shit, so if I am getting shit either way, might as well just get it done right out of the gate. there are plenty of posters that I disagree with that dont get removed from threads, its because they dont violate board rules and are civil towards those they disagree with.
as far as I am concerned, it was over as soon as I removed you from that thread. Dont bring it into others threads please.
I don't think you tried to be funny, but that's hilarious. I'm sure it didn't bother you at all when you removed me. Why would it, lol? I guess as long as you're Ok with your actions, nothing else matters.
I am fine with my actions, booting you from a thread didnt bring me joy as I have no beef with you or your point of view, I disagree, but that doesnt mean you having a differing position bothers me as long as you can voice it without degrading others... and that is what you were doing and that is why you were removed. I have done the same with those I agree with as well as those I disagree with. So like I said, this is over as far as I am concerned so let it go. and I am glad I could make you laugh.
Some information about Sound of Freedom (SoF) and a little of what's been discussed.
- 2015 - Script written- Oct 2017 - First posts by QAnon- 2018 - Film completed- 2018 - SoF Producers made a distribution deal with 20th Century Fox- 2019 - Walt Disney purchased 20th Century Fox, shelved the film
- 2019/2020 - QAnon information and following grows- March 2023 - Angel studios obtain distribution rights
- July 2023 - Angel studios releases the film
Quote: @DeepFreeze05 said:
Some information about Sound of Freedom (SoF) and a little of what's been discussed.
- 2015 - Script written- Oct 2017 - First posts by QAnon- 2018 - Film completed- 2018 - SoF Producers made a distribution deal with 20th Century Fox- 2019 - Walt Disney purchased 20th Century Fox, shelved the film
- 2019/2020 - QAnon information and following grows- March 2023 - Angel studios obtain distribution rights
- July 2023 - Angel studios releases the film
This is consistent with the timeline that NPR said in their story. The movie was clearly written and produced pre-QAnon. Angel Studios disavowed QAnon and said that the film had nothing to do with it...this timeline validates that. The story itself has nothing to do with QAnon. Caviezel is the one who is using the movie promo tour as a platform to push his QAnon theories, particularly the harvesting of Adrenochrome from trafficked children.
The two (the movie and QAnon) are actually unrelated, but QAnon platforms have been heavily promoting it because of Caviezel. It was clearly said was that the producers acknowledged that they took liberties with the true story. "It's a Story based on Tim Ballard's Story" is not the same as saying "It's a true story". So there are multiple different notions here, and I don't think that it's reasonable to tie them all together.
I have a hard time with movies / situations where kids are at risk / targeted / placed in dangerous situations or threatened - yeah, it happens, I get that, but it doesnt mean I like it.
Maybe its the teacher in me, but i have ZERO TOLERANCE for those who victimize, abuse, neglect, harrass, or otherwise harm children, or put them in Harms way. There a special rung in Dantes Inferno for them.
|
