Adapted from Martin's
Targaryen history book Fire & Blood,
House of the Dragon is set 200 years before the events of
Game of Thrones. The show will focus on an infamous event in Westeros history known as the Dance of the Dragons. This is a civil war that took place between siblings Aegon II and Rhaenyra over the throne after the death of their father Viserys I. The war pit all of Westeros against itself, with other houses such as the Starks and Lannisters joining either side. Many of House Targaryen's powerful dragons perished—and soon afterward would go extinct until Daenerys Targaryen would hatch three eggs hundreds of years later. We glimpse bits and pieces from the action in
House of the Dragon's first teaser, with some classic,
GOT-style sword-fighting, jousting, dramatically running down long hallways
. Plus, we glimpse Matt Smith's prince having some thoughts on the shoreline.
How Will
House of the Dragon Be Different From
Game of Thrones?Glad you asked. Even though
House of the Dragon is a prequel with a different agenda, the creative team still wants it to feel
of the
Game of Thrones world. As Sapochnik
told The Hollywood Reporter, "I think we were very respectful of what the original show is. It wasn't broken so we're not trying to reinvent the wheel.
House of the Dragon has its own tone that will evolve and emerge over the course of the show. But first, it's very important to pay respects and homage to the original series, which was pretty groundbreaking. We're standing on the shoulders of that show and we're only here because of that show."
Despite wanting to honor their roots, the
House of the Dragon team isn't looking to make a carbon copy of
Game of Thrones. That's good news for fans, who can expect something both similar and surprising. "That said, we can't say, 'Well, when we did
Thrones, we did it this way…,'" Sapochnik continued. "If you start every sentence with that, you've lost. This is something else, and should be something else. It's a different crew, different people, different tone. Hopefully it will be seen as something else. But it will have to earn that — it won't happen overnight. Hopefully fans will enjoy it for the thing that it is. We'll be lucky if we ever come close to what the original show was, so we're just putting our heads down and getting on with it and hoping what we come up with is worthy of having a
Game of Thrones title."
Smith echoed Sapochnik's comments,
describing the challenge of approaching existing storytelling from a new angle as "throwing some paint at the wall and see what sticks." He went on to highlight how chasing the high of
Game of Thrones is a futile endeavor, saying, "We're trying to make a show that's entertaining on lots of different levels and has a similar scope and ambition to the previous show, in many respects. But obviously, you're never going to be able to re-create the success of
Game of Thrones, because that was a very particular point in time. It was its own unique entity."
https://www.esquire.com/entertainment/tv...s-prequel/