Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Can We Put QB Wins To Bed Now?
#1
Last night, Cousins could stand on the beach and not hit open water.

Mac Jones completes 2 passes.

Lamar Jackson throws four picks.

All won.

For the love of all that is good and holy, QB wins is not a stat.

I'm begging.
Reply

#2
Preach Brother. Team game
Reply

#3
Quote: @Hawkvike25 said:
Preach Brother. Team game
Absolutely. I know the media rams this shit down our collective throats, but c'mon!

Think! Just a little. Might even feel good.
Reply

#4
[Image: sf8d2ggwq7ec.png]

Reply

#5
If the QB is so immaterial in wins,  why are they so heavily scaled in the salary cap for most teams not starting a qb on a rookie contract?
Reply

#6
Quote: @JimmyinSD said:
If the QB is so immaterial in wins,  why are they so heavily scaled in the salary cap for most teams not starting a qb on a rookie contract?
Never said QB was immaterial. Just an extremely flawed stat. It's a team game. 
Reply

#7
Quote: @JimmyinSD said:
If the QB is so immaterial in wins,  why are they so heavily scaled in the salary cap for most teams not starting a qb on a rookie contract?
Nobody is saying immaterial. Its a very important position obviously. You got 12 guys on offense and 12 guys on defense, yet the QB is the sole factor for wins and losses? Its nonsensical. 

[Image: nationalcatday-cats.gif]
Reply

#8
Quote: @StickyBun said:
@JimmyinSD said:
If the QB is so immaterial in wins,  why are they so heavily scaled in the salary cap for most teams not starting a qb on a rookie contract?
Nobody is saying immaterial. Its a very important position obviously. You got 12 guys on offense and 12 guys on defense, yet the QB is the sole factor for wins and losses? Its nonsensical. 
You've been watching Canadian football again, haven't you?
Reply

#9
Quote: @JustinTime18™ said:
@StickyBun said:
@JimmyinSD said:
If the QB is so immaterial in wins,  why are they so heavily scaled in the salary cap for most teams not starting a qb on a rookie contract?
Nobody is saying immaterial. Its a very important position obviously. You got 12 guys on offense and 12 guys on defense, yet the QB is the sole factor for wins and losses? Its nonsensical. 
You've been watching Canadian football again, haven't you?
lol, that is hilarious. I'm not even editing it. Fuck it, I'm owning it.

[Image: giphy.gif]
Reply

#10
I'll toss this wrinkle out there...

Someone the caliber of Mahomes, Brady or Rogers can make a diff, a big one. I'd bet $$ Rogers is worth 3 wins a year being on the Packer roster, maybe 4.

Hopefully Wi finds out what that surround with Love looks like vs Rogers in 22. 

Problem is? There aren't many of them guys. 
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
7 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 Melroy van den Berg.